Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$28.22
▼ $0.17 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/16 01:50 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$526.60M
Day Range
$28.22 - $28.56
52-Week Range
$15.25 - $36.26
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
CLMB is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-15.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 40.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
56
Risk
56
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
47
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. highlights its strategic expansion and financial performance. The company reported a **17% surge in gross billings** in Q2 2026, driven by vendor diversification, while also securing a **distribution agreement with Harmonic Security** to bolster AI adoption. Analysts noted strong revenue growth amid rising costs, though profitability faced pressure. The company’s focus on **scaling high-touch distribution globally** and its under-the-radar status in tech distribution were also emphasized.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Climb Global Solutions, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
22
Fundamentals
47
Technical
56
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+24%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a detached euphoria—driven by strong valuation metrics (+19.5% above 200-day average) and positive sentiment (92/100)—despite weak momentum (-1.6% ROC). This disconnect between price action and fundamentals may reflect overoptimism about long-term potential, ignoring near-term underperformance. The key open question is whether this euphoria persists or corrects as momentum fails to sustain valuation. Narrative-reality gap (17) hints at potential misalignment between investor expectations and market reality.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:36 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Climb Signs Distribution Agreement with Harmonic Security to Help Secure Mid-Market & Enterprise AI Adoption"
"Gross billings surged 17% as vendor diversification accelerates"
"Scaling High-Touch Distribution to Expand Global Footprint"
"strong revenue, weaker profits from higher SG&A"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for CLMB reflects deep contrasts in how these methodologies prioritize signals. At the top, value-focused investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Benjamin Graham see it as a long-term hold or defensive buy, drawn to its fundamentals and stability, while Peter Lynch’s growth lens highlights untapped upside. Meanwhile, Fisher and Nelson’s more nuanced approaches—one seeking exceptional quality, the other waiting for clear momentum—both downgrade it, suggesting it lacks the standout traits or decisive cycle positioning they favor. On the opposite end, trend-following traders like Livermore and Schwager reject it outright, dismissing it as either counter-trend or lacking a clear setup, while cycle-sensitive investors like Marks warn of late-stage risks. Even moderate voices like Housel and Bogle caution against overconfidence, framing it as holdable but not effortless or index-beating, underscoring how the same stock can be either a 'buy and hold' or a 'pass' depending on whether the focus is on fundamentals, growth, or market timing.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 83
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 80
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 65
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 63
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 62
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 52
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 50
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 46
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 42
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 37
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 16
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
16.1%
Operating Margin
4.5%
Net Margin
3.3%
EBITDA Margin
5.7%
ROE
18.3%
ROA
4.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.64
Cash
$36.56M
Total Debt
$191.00K
Current Ratio
1.11
Debt/Equity
0.00
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.11.2025 | $0.043 |
| 9.11.2025 | $0.043 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.043 |
| 10.8.2025 | $0.043 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.043 |
| 11.5.2025 | $0.043 |
| 17.3.2025 | $0.043 |
| 16.3.2025 | $0.043 |
| 8.11.2024 | $0.043 |
| 7.11.2024 | $0.043 |
| 16.8.2024 | $0.043 |
| 15.8.2024 | $0.043 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$25.77
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.50
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 8.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.8.2026
Yahoo · 9.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
Yahoo · 8.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
MarketBeat · 30.7.2026
Moby · 30.7.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
Associated Press · 29.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 29.7.2026
ChartMill · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 16.7.2026
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CLMB currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CLMB's technical score is 56/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 40.1%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.00.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend; ROC 12 days: -0.3%.
Yes — CLMB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bass Charles Edward | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 746 | -746 | $26.78 |
| Foster Dale Richard | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 1,015 | -1,015 | $26.78 |
| Popovich Timothy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 222 | -222 | $26.78 |
| SULLIVAN MATTHEW M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 646 | -646 | $26.78 |
| Foster Dale Richard | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 342,452 | -1,015 | $26.78 |
| Bass Charles Edward | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 126,974 | -746 | $26.78 |
| SULLIVAN MATTHEW M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 87,818 | -646 | $26.78 |
| Popovich Timothy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 57,891 | -222 | $26.78 |
| BELL PETER W | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 5,855 | +5,855 | — |
| BELL PETER W | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 5,855 | +5,855 | — |
| BRYANT ANDREW S | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 7,665 | +7,665 | — |
| GIOVACCHINI PAUL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 7,665 | +7,665 | — |
| MCCARTHY JOHN R | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 7,665 | +7,665 | — |
| BRYANT ANDREW S | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 36,529 | +7,665 | — |
| MCCARTHY JOHN R | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 93,541 | +7,665 | — |
| GIOVACCHINI PAUL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 22,657 | +7,665 | — |
| Bass Charles Edward | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.5.2026 | 645 | -645 | $18.76 |
| SULLIVAN MATTHEW M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.5.2026 | 558 | -558 | $18.76 |
| Popovich Timothy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.5.2026 | 725 | -725 | $18.76 |
| Foster Dale Richard | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.5.2026 | 883 | -883 | $18.76 |
| Foster Dale Richard | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.5.2026 | 343,467 | -883 | $18.76 |
| Bass Charles Edward | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.5.2026 | 127,720 | -645 | $18.76 |
| SULLIVAN MATTHEW M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.5.2026 | 88,464 | -558 | $18.76 |
| Popovich Timothy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.5.2026 | 58,113 | -725 | $18.76 |
| MCCARTHY JOHN R | Open Market Purchase | 4.5.2026 | 4,000 | +4,000 | $18.83 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,457,529 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,320,630 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology