Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$53.26
▼ $1.47 (-2.7%)
Market data updated: 09/16 01:56 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$1.65B
Day Range
$52.21 - $53.68
52-Week Range
$28.04 - $60.40
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
CBL is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+69.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 132.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 5.80
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
36
Risk
44
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
55
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. has centered on its financial performance and strategic asset sales, with a focus on strong second-quarter 2026 earnings and a $50.65 million sale of York Town Center in Pennsylvania. The company also declared its third-quarter dividend, while insider share sales and broader REIT investment risks were briefly noted. No new major operational or leadership changes were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 6 of the last 13 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
31
Fundamentals
55
Technical
36
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CBL suggests **anchoring** as the dominant state, with traders fixating on the 3.0% support level despite modest positive sentiment (68/100) and neutral RSI (44). The narrative gap (9 points) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations (47) and current reality (38), potentially reinforcing reliance on past reference points. Negative momentum (-3.5% ROC) and elevated volume (1.31x avg) may also subtly trigger cautious selling or FOMO, but anchoring remains the clearest signal. The key question: Will traders break free from the 3.0% support anchor, or will it persist as a psychological barrier?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:43 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"CBL Properties Declares Third Quarter Regular Cash Dividend"
"CBL Properties Reports Strong Results for Second Quarter 2026"
"CBL Properties Closes $50.65 Million Sale of York Town Center in York, PA"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits historical methodologies into two starkly contrasting camps: the growth-oriented optimists and the risk-averse skeptics. Lynch, Mackay, Nelson, and Schwager all score above 70, viewing CBL as a compelling opportunity—whether due to undervalued growth potential (Lynch), lack of speculative bubbles (Mackay), cyclical oversold conditions (Nelson), or disciplined technical setups (Schwager). Even Veblen and Fisher, while more cautious, still see *some* alignment with value creation or solid fundamentals, though Fisher notes it lacks exceptional quality. Conversely, the lower-scoring methodologies—particularly Graham’s defensive framework, Loeb’s risk assessment, and Housel’s volatility concerns—flag CBL as a red flag, either for failing margin-of-safety principles, exposing capital to unacceptable risk, or lacking the patience-friendly stability Housel prioritizes. The divide underscores a fundamental tension: is CBL a high-conviction growth bet (backed by Lynch and Schwager) or a speculative gamble (rejected outright by Loeb and Bagehot) where the evidence for outperformance is weak (per Malkiel/Bogle) or expectations already baked in (Howard Marks).
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 78
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 68
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 54
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 36
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 36
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 25
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 24
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$51.41
Range Bottom
$60.40
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
23.5%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
36.3%
ROA
5.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.41
Cash
$42.29M
Total Debt
$2.17B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
5.80
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 12.6.2026 | $0.625 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.625 |
| 10.4.2026 | $0.175 |
| 9.4.2026 | $0.175 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.450 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.450 |
| 25.11.2025 | $0.450 |
| 24.11.2025 | $0.450 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.450 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.450 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.400 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.400 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$12.16
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$12.16
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 13 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Business Wire · 14.8.2026
Associated Press · 6.8.2026
Business Wire · 6.8.2026
Business Wire · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.7.2026
Business Wire · 21.7.2026
Zacks · 7.7.2026
Zacks · 6.7.2026
Business Wire · 1.7.2026
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CBL currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CBL's technical score is 36/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 132.1%; Net income growth: 130.6%; Return on equity (ROE): 36.3% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 5.80; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — CBL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 18 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curry Jeffery V. | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 681 | -681 | $55.10 |
| Jaenicke Benjamin W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,968 | -1,968 | $54.37 |
| Reinsmidt Kathryn A. | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 17,515 | -17,515 | $57.10 |
| Grody Howard B. | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 76,311 | -1,000 | $47.92 |
| Grody Howard B. | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 77,311 | -4,728 | $48.06 |
| Grody Howard B. | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $47.92 |
| Grody Howard B. | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 4,728 | -4,728 | $48.06 |
| Fields David Michael | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 18,522 | -3,592 | $47.97 |
| Fields David Michael | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 3,592 | -3,592 | $47.97 |
| Jaenicke Benjamin W | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 130,607 | -526 | $48.57 |
| Jaenicke Benjamin W | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 131,133 | -5,974 | $48.45 |
| Jaenicke Benjamin W | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 526 | -526 | $48.57 |
| Jaenicke Benjamin W | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 5,974 | -5,974 | $48.45 |
| CANYON CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 7,416,294 | -1,050,000 | $46.44 |
| CANYON CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 1,050,000 | -1,050,000 | $46.44 |
| Cobb Andrew Franklin | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 59,673 | -8,099 | $45.80 |
| Cobb Andrew Franklin | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 59,622 | -51 | $46.31 |
| Cobb Andrew Franklin | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 8,099 | -8,099 | $45.80 |
| Cobb Andrew Franklin | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 51 | -51 | $46.31 |
| Curry Jeffery V. | Gift | 8.4.2026 | 145,499 | -2,476 | — |
| Curry Jeffery V. | Gift | 8.4.2026 | 2,476 | -2,476 | — |
| Curry Jeffery V. | Gift | 6.4.2026 | 147,975 | -3,000 | — |
| Curry Jeffery V. | Gift | 6.4.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Cobb Andrew Franklin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.2.2026 | 67,772 | -471 | $36.13 |
| LEBOVITZ STEPHEN D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.2.2026 | 560,653 | -1,985 | $35.59 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,042,790 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,035,290 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
47.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology