Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$1.86
▲ $0.13 (+7.5%)
Market data updated: 09/23 12:15 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$670.78M
Day Range
$1.79 - $1.86
52-Week Range
$1.18 - $4.55
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Support
$1.18
Resistance
$1.88
-41.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -80.9% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $1.73
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 19 to 59 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
58
Value
55
Momentum
72
Risk
40
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
30
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Bit Digital, Inc. has primarily focused on its strategic pivot away from crypto-related operations toward AI cloud and colocation infrastructure, particularly through its majority stake in WhiteFiber (WYFI). Analysts have noted the company trades at a significant discount to its net asset value, highlighting its 70% stake in WhiteFiber as a key asset. Despite reporting a $107.2 million Q2 loss, Bit Digital’s stock has risen, contrasting with broader selloffs in crypto-linked firms. The narrative emphasizes its potential long-term growth in AI-driven infrastructure rather than traditional crypto exposure.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Bit Digital, Inc. - Ordinary Share. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
56
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
30
Technical
72
Valuation
55
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-15%
Market Narrative
84
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+49
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant FOMO-driven rally, supported by strong momentum, elevated volume, and extreme positive sentiment. The narrative gap and overconfidence imply traders are prioritizing short-term price action over fundamentals, while herding behavior aligns with the stock’s relative outperformance. The key open question is whether this momentum can sustain itself given the disconnect between price gains and weak revenue trends. The lack of anchoring or loss aversion signals no immediate defensive positioning, but the narrative gap may heighten vulnerability to a correction if sentiment shifts.
Updated: 09/05/2026, 05:39 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Bit Digital (BTBT) upgraded to Buy as it pivots from crypto to AI cloud/colocation via WhiteFiber."
"Bit Digital trades at a steep discount to its net asset value, with its 70% WYFI stake alone exceeding its market cap."
"Bit Digital stock climbed after a $107.2 million quarterly loss, breaking from the selloff hitting rival crypto treasury firms."
"Cloud services revenue surged 42% sequentially as WhiteFiber signed $500M in new contracts."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for BTBT reflects deep contrasts in how these methodologies prioritize risk, valuation, and market context. Benjamin Graham and Walter Bagehot’s near-unanimous high scores highlight their focus on defensive metrics—strong liquidity and statistical discounts—suggesting a resilient balance sheet and undervaluation that aligns with their core principles. Meanwhile, the sharp drop-off to mid-range scores from Howard Marks and Gerald Loeb signals concerns about overvaluation or speculative risk, while the lowest scores from Jack Schwager and Morgan Housel underscore a consensus that the stock lacks the structural setup or patience-friendly stability either would demand. Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen’s rejection points to a lack of growth momentum or quality, contrasting sharply with Graham’s enterprising investor’s enthusiasm for its statistical edge. The debate ultimately hinges on whether BTBT’s liquidity and valuation justify its speculative traits—or if its volatility and speculative hype make it a high-risk gamble.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 94
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 65
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 40
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 28
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 27
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 26
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 21
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 7
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-80.9%
Net Margin
-70.7%
EBITDA Margin
-48.4%
ROE
-11.1%
ROA
-6.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.31
Cash
$118.36M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
6.39
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.86
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$56.88
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-718.57M | $-659.23M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-857.79M | $-721.98M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-975.73M | $-753.45M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-1.06B | $-747.40M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-1.08B | $-702.83M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-574.85M
Terminal Value
$-17.05B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-11.08B
Enterprise Value
$-14.67B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-14.67B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.81
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.68
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Stocktwits · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Associated Press · 21.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.8.2026
Bit Digital, Inc. - Ordinary Share (BTBT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BTBT currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
BTBT's technical score is 72/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 6.39; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -80.9% (negative); Net margin: -70.7% (negative); ATR: 7.3% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BTBT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huang Erke | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 535,000 | +535,000 | $1.43 |
| Tabar Samir | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 535,000 | -535,000 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 535,000 | +535,000 | $1.43 |
| Huang Erke | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 535,000 | -535,000 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 200,000 | +200,000 | $2.00 |
| Huang Erke | Other Transaction | 18.8.2026 | 200,000 | -200,000 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Other Transaction | 18.8.2026 | 200,000 | -200,000 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2026 | 200,000 | +200,000 | $2.00 |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 135,000 | +135,000 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 135,000 | +135,000 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 400,000 | +400,000 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 400,000 | +400,000 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 535,000 | +135,000 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 400,000 | +400,000 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 535,000 | +135,000 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 400,000 | +400,000 | — |
| Zhu Justin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.4.2026 | 40,165 | -40,165 | — |
| Zhu Justin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.4.2026 | 102,375 | -40,165 | — |
| Zhu Justin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.3.2026 | 94,340 | +94,340 | — |
| Huang Erke | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.3.2026 | 750,000 | +750,000 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 150,000 | +150,000 | — |
| Zhu Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 94,340 | +94,340 | — |
| Tabar Samir | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.3.2026 | 150,000 | +150,000 | — |
| Huang Erke | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 750,000 | +750,000 | — |
| Huang Erke | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.3.2026 | 2,130,000 | +750,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
67,817,506 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 63,392,510 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology