Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$13.79
▲ $0.15 (+1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/17 10:01 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$417.14M
Day Range
$13.56 - $13.85
52-Week Range
$10.52 - $15.22
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
+3.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$6.90 vs. price $13.79 (-150.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
46
Risk
54
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
39
Institutional
88
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Boston Omaha Corporation has centered on financial updates and strategic developments. The company reported its **Q2 2026 earnings**, highlighting financial performance while also announcing a **$23 million USDA grant** for fiber expansion through a subsidiary. Additionally, it disclosed a **stock placement increase** for Sky Harbour, updated its **investor conference schedule**, and filed construction reports. Insider buying activity and the **2026 annual stockholders' meeting date** were also noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Boston Omaha Corporation. News trend score: 62. Reason: 2 of the last 10 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
7
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
34
Fundamentals
39
Technical
46
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
48
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning with peers rather than independent analysis, as BOC’s relative underperformance (-0.3% vs. sector) may signal a lagging trend. Overconfidence (23) hints at traders overvaluing momentum despite weakening fundamentals (-9.0% EPS growth). The narrative gap (7) implies a disconnect between optimistic expectations and underlying reality. The key question: *Is this herding a lagging indicator or a precursor to further divergence?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:41 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Insider spends US$127k buying more shares"
"Announces Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results"
"Boston Omaha Unit Receives $23 Million USDA Funding for Fiber Expansion"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 35/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between deep-value and growth-oriented frameworks. Benjamin Graham’s methodologies—both defensive and enterprising—score it highly (88–90), praising its statistical discount and liquidity, while Charles Mackay’s absence of crowd mania (87) and Walter Bagehot’s resilience to credit stress (80) further validate its structural stability. In contrast, growth-focused investors like Peter Lynch (38) and Philip Fisher (35) dismiss it outright, as the stock lacks the earnings momentum or quality traits they prioritize. Meanwhile, market-efficiency skeptics like Malkiel/Bogle (54) and Livermore/Schwager (50) see no clear edge over passive strategies, while cycle-sensitive thinkers like Marks (56) and Nelson (65) split between middling positioning and a cautiously favorable trend. The divide underscores whether the stock’s fundamentals align with patient, margin-of-safety investing or whether it’s a niche case for only the most disciplined value-oriented approaches.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 90
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 87
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 84
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 69
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 67
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 55
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 38
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
65.8%
Operating Margin
-3.4%
Net Margin
-10.9%
EBITDA Margin
-3.4%
ROE
-2.4%
ROA
-1.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.40
Cash
$28.62M
Total Debt
$48.77M
Current Ratio
1.98
Debt/Equity
0.09
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$13.79
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$6.90
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-150.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
12.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.2% | $-11.27M | $-10.34M |
| 2 | 9.8% | $-12.37M | $-10.41M |
| 3 | 7.4% | $-13.28M | $-10.25M |
| 4 | 4.9% | $-13.93M | $-9.87M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-14.28M | $-9.28M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-10.04M
Terminal Value
$-225.17M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-146.35M
Enterprise Value
$-196.49M
Net Debt
$20.15M
Equity Value
$-216.64M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$16.43
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.99
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 2 positive, 8 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 10 articles.
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 21.8.2026
Associated Press · 13.8.2026
Business Wire · 13.8.2026
Business Wire · 30.6.2026
MT Newswires · 16.6.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.6.2026
Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BOC currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BOC's estimated fair value is -$6.90, which is 150.0% below the current price of $13.79. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BOC's technical score is 46/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.09; Current ratio: 1.98.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$6.90 vs. price $13.79 (-150.0%); Operating margin: -3.4% (negative); Net margin: -10.9% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BOC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 15 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOSTON OMAHA Corp | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 360,000 | -360,000 | $10.00 |
| Kenan Frank H. II | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 6,033 | +6,033 | $12.89 |
| Kenan Frank H. II | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 315,991 | +6,033 | $12.89 |
| Kenan Frank H. II | Open Market Purchase | 29.5.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $12.93 |
| Kenan Frank H. II | Open Market Purchase | 29.5.2026 | 309,958 | +10,000 | $12.93 |
| Kenan Frank H. II | Open Market Purchase | 28.5.2026 | 34,719 | +34,719 | $13.37 |
| Kenan Frank H. II | Open Market Purchase | 28.5.2026 | 299,958 | +34,719 | $13.37 |
| Royal Jeffrey C | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $12.72 |
| Royal Jeffrey C | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $12.82 |
| Royal Jeffrey C | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2026 | 69,644 | +10,000 | $12.72 |
| Royal Jeffrey C | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2026 | 31,046 | +10,000 | $12.82 |
| Royal Jeffrey C | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 11,046 | +11,046 | $12.82 |
| Royal Jeffrey C | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 21,046 | +11,046 | $12.82 |
| Royal Jeffrey C | Open Market Purchase | 22.5.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $12.40 |
| Royal Jeffrey C | Open Market Purchase | 22.5.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $12.40 |
| BOSTON OMAHA Corp | Open Market Sale | 6.4.2026 | 331,500 | -331,500 | $9.05 |
| Weisenburger Joshua Paul | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.2.2026 | 742 | -742 | $12.31 |
| Weisenburger Joshua Paul | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.2.2026 | 4,061 | +4,061 | $12.31 |
| Weisenburger Joshua Paul | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.2.2026 | 30,242 | +4,061 | $12.31 |
| Weisenburger Joshua Paul | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.2.2026 | 29,500 | -742 | $12.31 |
| Burt Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 14,738 | +14,738 | $13.62 |
| Burt Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 21,632 | +14,738 | $13.62 |
| Burt Thomas | Open Market Purchase | 11.12.2025 | 21,632 | +14,738 | $13.62 |
| Kenan Frank H. II | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.12.2025 | 8,000 | +8,000 | $12.92 |
| Kenan Frank H. II | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.12.2025 | 16,743 | +16,743 | $12.94 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,753,239 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,664,459 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 71.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology