Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$14.81
▼ $0.20 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/24 08:14 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/09/2026
News analyzed: 09/24/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$14.71 - $14.95
52-Week Range
$14.39 - $36.40
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$14.39
Resistance
$19.47
BILI is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-42.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 186.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.06 (3y annualized return 3.3% / max drawdown 59.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
16
Risk
42
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
43
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Bilibili Inc. has centered on its financial strategies and operational performance. The company announced a $700 million convertible senior notes offering alongside equity placements and share repurchases, signaling efforts to optimize capital structure. Concurrently, Q2 2026 earnings highlighted record profit margins and AI-driven growth, particularly in its advertising engine, while its gaming unit faced challenges. Analysts like Nomura adjusted price targets downward to $18, reflecting cautious but mixed market sentiment.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Bilibili Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
10
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
43
Technical
16
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-10%
Market Narrative
31
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
-10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for BILI is dominated by anchoring, as the stock’s proximity to support (0.5%) suggests traders are fixating on this level, likely due to recent price action. While loss aversion (11) hints at hesitation to sell, panic selling (37) and FOMO (9) remain muted by oversold conditions and weak momentum. The narrative gap (-10) implies traders may be underestimating current fundamentals relative to price. The key question: *Will traders break above support, or will the stock consolidate near this anchor?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Bilibili’s ad engine and margins outrun its slumping game unit"
"Record margins and AI-driven growth"
"AI-driven U.S. market concentration"
"accelerating ads, rising DAUs"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between bullish and bearish camps, with some approaches lacking enough data to form a clear opinion. The highest-scoring models—Samuel Armstrong Nelson, Charles Mackay, and Howard Marks (Market Cycle)—all suggest this stock is in a favorable position, either due to oversold conditions, absence of crowd-driven mania, or an early-to-mid cycle phase. Meanwhile, Jack Schwager’s disciplined, reward/risk-focused approach also leans positive, though with slightly more caution. On the other end, the lowest scores—from Jesse Livermore, Morgan Housel, and Gerald Loeb—flag red flags like trend resistance, volatility, and excessive risk, while the efficient-market camp dismisses it as unworthy of active picking. The middle ground is dominated by methodologies that simply lack sufficient data—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Smith—leaving their verdicts inconclusive, while Veblen’s mixed signal hints at uncertainty over profitability. The contrast underscores how even similar stocks can be interpreted wildly differently depending on whether the focus is on technical cycles, crowd psychology, or fundamental uncertainty.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 99
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 86
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 86
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 83
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 68
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 57
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 57
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 57
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 55
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 45
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
36.6%
Operating Margin
4.8%
Net Margin
3.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.7%
ROA
2.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.80
Cash
$12.24B
Total Debt
$9.64B
Current Ratio
1.36
Debt/Equity
0.62
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$14.81
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$237.74
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
11.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.7% | $5.94B | $5.45B |
| 2 | 9.4% | $6.50B | $5.47B |
| 3 | 7.1% | $6.96B | $5.38B |
| 4 | 4.8% | $7.30B | $5.17B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $7.48B | $4.86B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$5.32B
Terminal Value
$117.92B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$76.64B
Enterprise Value
$102.97B
Net Debt
$-2.60B
Equity Value
$105.56B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$37.55
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$30.05
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 9 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 1.9.2026
Motley Fool · 31.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Bilibili Inc. (BILI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BILI currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
BILI's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 186.7%; Free cash flow growth: 24.9%; Net income growth: 188.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.06 (3y annualized return 3.3% / max drawdown 59.9%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BILI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 3 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li Ni | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 4,000,000 | +4,000,000 | — |
| Fan Xin | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 400,000 | +400,000 | — |
| Chen Rui | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 4,000,000 | +4,000,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
24,614,081 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 21,997,095 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology