Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$135.90
▼ $2.34 (-1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:09 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$27.01B
Day Range
$135.44 - $137.32
52-Week Range
$120.57 - $145.64
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$128.95
Resistance
$142.37
AWK is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+0.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$111.56 vs. price $135.90 (-182.1%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
83/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-0.0%
Median 40D Outcome
64/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+2.1% … +9.8%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
47%
-6.0% … -3.5%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.3%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
4 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | -0.3% | -2.9% … +2.2% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.6% | -2.7% … +5.2% | +0.5% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.3% | -4.0% … +6.5% | +0.7% |
| 40D | 33% (15%–58%) | -0.0% | -3.4% … +4.0% | +1.3% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.0% | -3.6% … +4.5% | +1.9% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-02 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +9.5% | +9.0% |
| 2018-09-27 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +3.4% | -0.7% |
| 2018-01-03 | 82/100 | Consolidation | -7.5% | -8.2% |
| 2020-09-17 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +10.5% | +5.1% |
| 2025-09-04 | 82/100 | Consolidation | -4.2% | -8.1% |
| 2018-08-01 | 81/100 | Uptrend | +1.3% | +3.9% |
| 2021-02-18 | 81/100 | Uptrend | -13.2% | -4.6% |
| 2021-06-29 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +9.6% | +14.4% |
| 2019-10-18 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -3.4% | +3.7% |
| 2020-10-30 | 80/100 | Uptrend | +1.9% | +6.2% |
| 2020-01-07 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +12.6% | -2.0% |
| 2021-09-23 | 79/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.4% | +3.0% |
| 2025-05-08 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.7% | -2.7% |
| 2024-10-04 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -4.6% | -12.7% |
| 2025-07-29 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +2.1% | +2.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLU (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
28d ago · $135.39
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $135.39
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $138.71
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $138.71
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $137.00
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $137.00
Evidence: 7 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
59
$136.98
Now
51
$135.90
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
53
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
33
Risk
48
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
60
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING AWK...
Recent media coverage of **American Water Works (AWK)** has primarily focused on its strategic acquisitions and financial stability. The company’s Missouri unit completed the $34.5 million purchase of Neosho’s water and wastewater systems, expanding its customer base and planning $35 million in upgrades. Analysts also noted AWK’s strong liquidity ($1.4 billion) and favorable debt metrics, while separate reports highlighted its dividend growth potential. No major controversies or operational disruptions were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Water Works. News trend score: 80. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
60
Technical
33
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+9%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixating on the 1.3% resistance gap, likely due to recent price action. Overconfidence in momentum (+2.3% ROC vs. +0.1% EPS growth) may reinforce this, while FOMO (27) hints at cautious excitement rather than euphoria. The narrative gap (56 vs. 42) implies traders are overestimating positive developments. The key question: will traders break the resistance or hold near it, or will momentum stall?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:00 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The transaction adds Neosho customers to Missouri American Water's service footprint and includes plans for infrastructure upgrades."
"The acquisition expands the company's operational scale in Missouri and is relevant for investors tracking regulated utilities growth initiatives."
"California American Water has begun the Lincoln Oaks Water Main Replacement Project, an $8.6 million investment to modernize critical water infrastructure."
"American Water Works ended Q2 with $1.4 billion in available liquidity and a debt-to-capital ratio still under its long-term target."
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into starkly different camps, with scores ranging from a near-unanimous 'hold' to outright rejection. Edgar Lawrence Smith’s high score suggests a long-term buy-and-hold candidate, while the majority—including Fisher, Lynch, and Graham—flag fundamental flaws like weak growth, valuation, or liquidity risks. The divide between Marks’ mixed but cautiously optimistic view and his *market cycle* variant’s late-cycle warning highlights how context (e.g., broader economic conditions) drastically alters even the same investor’s stance. Meanwhile, the lowest scores from Schwager’s disciplined traders and Nelson’s cycle analysis paint a picture of speculative overreach, contrasting sharply with the more forgiving crowd psychology signals from Mackay. The debate hinges on whether the stock’s perceived strengths (e.g., business quality) justify its risks or if it’s already priced for perfection.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 81
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 57
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 24
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
36.7%
Net Margin
21.7%
EBITDA Margin
54.1%
ROE
10.3%
ROA
3.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.69
Cash
$98.00M
Total Debt
$1.59B
Current Ratio
0.46
Debt/Equity
0.15
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.8.2026 | $0.895 |
| 12.5.2026 | $0.895 |
| 11.5.2026 | $0.895 |
| 10.2.2026 | $0.828 |
| 9.2.2026 | $0.828 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.828 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.828 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.828 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.828 |
| 13.5.2025 | $0.828 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.828 |
| 7.2.2025 | $0.765 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$135.90
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$111.56
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-182.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.8% | $-1.18B | $-1.08B |
| 2 | 8.7% | $-1.29B | $-1.08B |
| 3 | 6.7% | $-1.37B | $-1.06B |
| 4 | 4.6% | $-1.43B | $-1.02B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-1.47B | $-955.48M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-1.07B
Terminal Value
$-23.18B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-15.07B
Enterprise Value
$-20.26B
Net Debt
$1.49B
Equity Value
$-21.75B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$55.57
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$49.65
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 7 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
PR Newswire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
PR Newswire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
American Water Works (AWK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AWK currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AWK's estimated fair value is -$111.56, which is 182.1% below the current price of $135.90. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AWK's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 2.0% of price; Debt/equity: 0.15.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$111.56 vs. price $135.90 (-182.1%); Current ratio: 0.46; Calmar: -0.02 (3y annualized return -0.4% / max drawdown 20.3%).
Yes — AWK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAMPLING PATRICIA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,374 | +1,374 | — |
| Grow Lisa A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,374 | +1,374 | — |
| JOHNSON JULIA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,374 | +1,374 | — |
| MCGUIGAN STUART M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,374 | +1,374 | — |
| Havanec Laurie P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,374 | +1,374 | — |
| Marberry Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,374 | +1,374 | — |
| Edwards Jeffrey N | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,374 | +1,374 | — |
| Kurz Karl F | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 2,159 | +2,159 | — |
| Nathoo Raffiq | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,374 | +1,374 | — |
| JOHNSON JULIA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 32,052 | +1,374 | — |
| Kurz Karl F | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 22,758 | +2,159 | — |
| Edwards Jeffrey N | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 11,826 | +1,374 | — |
| Grow Lisa A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 2,242 | +1,374 | — |
| MCGUIGAN STUART M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 3,340 | +1,374 | — |
| KAMPLING PATRICIA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 9,028 | +1,374 | — |
| Havanec Laurie P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,369 | +1,374 | — |
| Marberry Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 11,395 | +1,374 | — |
| Nathoo Raffiq | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 2,536 | +1,374 | — |
| Duffy Maureen | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.2.2026 | 2,014 | +2,014 | — |
| Duffy Maureen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.2.2026 | 932 | -932 | $133.51 |
| Duffy Maureen | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.2.2026 | 1,301 | +1,301 | — |
| Norton Cheryl | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.2.2026 | 5,901 | +5,901 | — |
| Griffith John C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.2.2026 | 8,322 | +8,322 | — |
| Griffith John C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.2.2026 | 12,729 | +12,729 | — |
| Wikle Melissa K. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.2.2026 | 543 | -543 | $133.51 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,658,804 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,074,515 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
68.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 77.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology