Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Miscellaneous · ·
$1.96
▲ $0.12 (+6.5%)
Market data updated: 09/18 06:13 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$9.73M
Day Range
$1.88 - $2.04
52-Week Range
$1.83 - $52.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
-96.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Gross margin
Gross margin: 100.0% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$2.20 vs. price $1.96 (-212.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
36
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
38
Quality
No data available
Value
38
Momentum
15
Risk
26
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
30
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. has centered exclusively on its **13th U.S. patent (No. 12,725,176)**, granted on September 3, 2026, for technology enabling real-time conversion of in-store shopper behavior into personalized, priced offers delivered directly to their phones. The patent—filed as early as 2013—aligns with the growing $71.09 billion retail media advertising market, though no other substantive developments or financial updates were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
30
Technical
15
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-51%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant panic-driven liquidation phase, amplified by extreme downside momentum and volatility spikes. The narrative gap near equilibrium (-1) implies sentiment may not fully reflect fundamentals, but the 92/100 news score hints at lingering positive framing. Loss aversion (50) coexists, indicating hesitation to exit despite steep losses. The key question: Will the 2.5x volume sustain, or will it collapse as panic subsides?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 12:03 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"U.S. Patent No. 12,725,176 covering how a shopper's behavior inside a physical store becomes a priced, personalized offer delivered to that shopper's phone"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between cyclical optimism and fundamental caution. At the top of the spectrum, **Nelson** and **Schwager** see a strong technical setup—Nelson flags it as oversold, while Schwager highlights a disciplined reward/risk profile, suggesting a near-term bullish bias. **Marks (Cycle)** and **Mackay** also lean positive, with Marks calling it early-to-mid cycle and Mackay spotting no crowd-driven mania, implying a more measured but still constructive view. However, **Marks (Valuation)**, **Veblen**, and **Livermore** introduce friction: Marks warns of overpriced expectations, Veblen detects growth-chasing behavior, and Livermore’s trend-following rule outright rejects the stock. The bottom half—from **Malkiel/Bogle** down—dismisses it outright, with passive investors (Malkiel/Bogle) and risk-averse strategists (Loeb, Bagehot) seeing it as either inefficient or outright dangerous, while the Graham/Fisher/Lynch methodologies lack sufficient data to even engage. The divide underscores whether this stock’s appeal lies in technical momentum (backed by Nelson/Schwager) or whether its risks—overvaluation, trend resistance, or liquidity concerns—outweigh its potential.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 28
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 18
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 13
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 0
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
100.0%
Operating Margin
-73468.6%
Net Margin
-112373.7%
EBITDA Margin
-73468.6%
ROE
16.4%
ROA
-983.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.29
Cash
—
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.09
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.96
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$2.20
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-212.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $-3.54M | $-3.25M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $-3.83M | $-3.22M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $-4.07M | $-3.14M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $-4.24M | $-3.01M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-4.35M | $-2.83M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-3.22M
Terminal Value
$-68.61M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-44.59M
Enterprise Value
$-60.04M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-60.04M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$1.79
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$1.79
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 36/100, rated "Weak" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMOD currently scores 36/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMOD's estimated fair value is -$2.20, which is 212.2% below the current price of $1.96. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMOD's technical score is 15/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Gross margin: 100.0% — strong; CMF 20 days: 0.26.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$2.20 vs. price $1.96 (-212.2%); Operating margin: -73468.6% (negative); Net margin: -112373.7% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AMOD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 12 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chumas Christopher Phillip | Gift | 30.10.2025 | 215,000 | +215,000 | — |
| Alessi William Rosario Jr | Gift | 30.10.2025 | 430,000 | -430,000 | — |
| Chumas Christopher Phillip | Gift | 30.10.2025 | 215,000 | +215,000 | — |
| Alessi William Rosario Jr | Gift | 30.10.2025 | 3,870,000 | -430,000 | — |
| Chumas Christopher Phillip | Gift | 30.10.2025 | 215,000 | +215,000 | — |
| Chumas Christopher Phillip | Gift | 30.10.2025 | 430,000 | +215,000 | — |
| Insight Acquisition Sponsor LLC | Other Transaction | 18.10.2021 | 900,000 | -900,000 | — |
| Gary Jeff | Other Transaction | 18.10.2021 | 900,000 | -900,000 | — |
| Singer Michael Evan | Other Transaction | 18.10.2021 | 900,000 | -900,000 | — |
| Gary Jeff | Open Market Sale | 7.9.2021 | 1,350,000 | -1,350,000 | $0.00 |
| Insight Acquisition Sponsor LLC | Open Market Sale | 7.9.2021 | 1,350,000 | -1,350,000 | $0.00 |
| Singer Michael Evan | Open Market Sale | 7.9.2021 | 1,350,000 | -1,350,000 | $0.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
39,544 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 38,995 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology