Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$18.88
▼ $0.06 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/22 12:55 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$50.62M
Day Range
$18.80 - $18.90
52-Week Range
$18.00 - $21.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$18.60
Resistance
$19.53
AIRTP is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-1.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1393.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -3.4% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
74/100
Similarity
7
Historical Matches
71/100
Analog Quality
+0.0%
Median 40D Outcome
89/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
29%
+3.5% … +3.6%
🟡 Base
57%
-0.1% … +0.1%
🔴 Bearish
14%
-3.5% … -3.5%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 7 similar historical cases for this stock, 29% (95% CI 8%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.1%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 43% (16%–75%) | +0.5% | -0.4% … +2.6% | +0.0% |
| 10D | 29% (8%–64%) | -0.1% | -1.1% … +1.0% | -0.5% |
| 20D | 29% (8%–64%) | +0.1% | -0.1% … +1.8% | -0.7% |
| 40D | 14% (3%–51%) | +0.0% | -0.2% … +0.4% | -0.7% |
| 60D | 14% (3%–51%) | -1.6% | -2.3% … -0.6% | -1.0% |
Sample size: 7 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-07 | 74/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.4% | +1.4% |
| 2026-03-18 | 64/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.5% | -3.5% |
| 2026-06-24 | 63/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +0.0% | -1.6% |
| 2026-05-01 | 62/100 | Consolidation | +0.3% | -1.1% |
| 2026-06-08 | 55/100 | Consolidation | +3.7% | -1.6% |
| 2026-05-22 | 50/100 | Consolidation | +0.1% | -3.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | 39/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.3% | -0.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
58
Value
60
Momentum
53
Risk
50
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
52
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Air T Inc. Air T Funding Alpha Income Trust Preferred Securities. News trend score: 56. Reason: 1 of the last 2 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
68
Fundamentals
52
Technical
53
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that investors who focus on crowd sentiment and deep statistical discounts—such as Charles Mackay and Benjamin Graham's enterprising framework—assign very high scores (96 and 93), seeing little mania and a clear value opportunity. Growth‑oriented thinkers like Thorstein Veblen and Peter Lynch also rate the stock favorably (80 and 78), interpreting the price as lagging behind real value creation. More balanced or cyclical approaches (Graham’s classic screen, Howard Marks, Philip Fisher) give middle‑range scores (around 53‑69), reflecting mixed signals about quality, expectations, and cycle position. Conversely, trend‑following and liquidity‑sensitive methodologies (Jesse Livermore, Walter Bagehot) assign very low scores (26 and 16), indicating that the recent price trend and liquidity profile conflict with their core rules.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 93
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 93
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 78
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 69
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 39
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 38
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 21
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 16
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 5 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$18.60
Range Bottom
$19.53
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-3.4%
Net Margin
23.8%
EBITDA Margin
0.3%
ROE
97.7%
ROA
19.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$28.85
Cash
$20.33M
Total Debt
$208.20M
Current Ratio
1.67
Debt/Equity
2.61
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.500 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.500 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.500 |
| 14.11.2025 | $0.500 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.500 |
| 14.5.2025 | $0.500 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.500 |
| 14.11.2024 | $0.500 |
| 14.8.2024 | $0.500 |
| 13.5.2024 | $0.500 |
| 13.2.2024 | $0.500 |
| 13.11.2023 | $0.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$18.88
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$355.69
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
9.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.9% | $-45.65M | $-41.88M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $-49.34M | $-41.53M |
| 3 | 6.2% | $-52.41M | $-40.47M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $-54.69M | $-38.74M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-56.06M | $-36.43M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-41.53M
Terminal Value
$-883.97M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-574.52M
Enterprise Value
$-773.57M
Net Debt
$187.86M
Equity Value
$-961.43M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$29.53
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$20.33
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 2 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Air T Inc. Air T Funding Alpha Income Trust Preferred Securities (AIRTP) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AIRTP currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AIRTP's technical score is 53/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1393.7%; Net income growth: 1370.1%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -3.4% (negative); Calmar: -0.17 (3y annualized return -5.1% / max drawdown 30.4%); Free cash flow growth: -285.3%.
Yes — AIRTP has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 12 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOHLER GARY S | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 500 | +500 | — |
| THINGELSTAD JAMIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 292 | +292 | — |
| THINGELSTAD JAMIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 292 | +292 | — |
| Kennedy Tracy | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 2,000 | +2,000 | — |
| THINGELSTAD JAMIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 292 | +292 | — |
| KOHLER GARY S | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 500 | +500 | — |
| THINGELSTAD JAMIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 500 | +500 | — |
| THINGELSTAD JAMIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 290 | +290 | — |
| Kennedy Tracy | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 2,000 | +2,000 | — |
| THINGELSTAD JAMIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 292 | +292 | — |
| THINGELSTAD JAMIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 500 | +500 | — |
| THINGELSTAD JAMIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2025 | 292 | +292 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,370 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 704 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology