Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$14.95
▲ $0.13 (+0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:12 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$2.50B
Day Range
$14.81 - $15.07
52-Week Range
$14.06 - $28.46
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.11.2026
AEO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-25.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $19.30 vs. price $14.95 (+29.1%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
4d ago · $15.02
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 7 to 41 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
63
Value
67
Momentum
19
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
56
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) has centered on its upcoming Q2 earnings report, with analysts anticipating strong performance, particularly from its Aerie skincare and beauty subsidiary. Investors are evaluating whether the stock is undervalued, while broader discussions highlight profitability and competitive pressures in the retail sector. No major operational or financial crises have been reported, but market scrutiny remains on long-term growth amid industry challenges.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
37
Fundamentals
56
Technical
19
Valuation
67
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
-17%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AEO’s market behavior suggests **FOMO** is the dominant psychological force, driven by strong momentum and positive sentiment. The disconnect between price gains (+7.2% ROC) and stagnant fundamentals (-0.4% EPS growth) hints at overconfidence, but not yet euphoria. The narrative gap (7-point divergence) implies traders may be overestimating recent performance. Key uncertainty remains: whether momentum will sustain or if traders will reassess fundamentals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:07 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""American Eagle Outfitters Set for Solid Q2 as Aerie Strength Builds""
""American Eagle (AEO) doesn’t possess the right combination... for a likely earnings beat""
""Get a deeper insight into the potential performance... examining the estimates for some of its key metrics""
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some models seeing strong potential while others flag significant red flags. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology assessment and Howard Marks’ risk-pricing framework—both suggest relative calm and reasonable valuation, implying no obvious speculative frenzy or overvaluation. Meanwhile, value-focused investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Benjamin Graham lean bullish, with Smith calling it a ‘buy and hold for a decade’ candidate, though Graham’s stricter tests leave it in mixed territory. On the opposite end, trend-following traders like Jesse Livermore and cycle analysts like Nelson and Schwager dismiss it outright, citing negative momentum and overbought conditions, while Fisher and Veblen dismiss it for lacking the quality or purposeful growth they demanded. Even the efficient-market camp sees little justification for active picking here, highlighting how the stock’s appeal hinges entirely on subjective, non-quantitative filters.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 72
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 48
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 45
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 45
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 36
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 26
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 8 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
36.5%
Operating Margin
4.1%
Net Margin
3.5%
EBITDA Margin
8.1%
ROE
11.3%
ROA
4.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.12
Cash
$238.92M
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
1.51
Debt/Equity
0.00
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.7.2026 | $0.125 |
| 9.7.2026 | $0.125 |
| 10.4.2026 | $0.125 |
| 9.4.2026 | $0.125 |
| 9.1.2026 | $0.125 |
| 8.1.2026 | $0.125 |
| 10.10.2025 | $0.125 |
| 9.10.2025 | $0.125 |
| 11.7.2025 | $0.125 |
| 10.7.2025 | $0.125 |
| 11.4.2025 | $0.125 |
| 10.4.2025 | $0.125 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$14.95
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$19.30
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+29.1%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6% | $202.44M | $185.72M |
| 2 | 3.3% | $209.18M | $176.06M |
| 3 | 3.1% | $215.57M | $166.46M |
| 4 | 2.8% | $221.55M | $156.95M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $227.09M | $147.59M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$195.39M
Terminal Value
$3.58B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.33B
Enterprise Value
$3.16B
Net Debt
$-238.92M
Equity Value
$3.40B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.61
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.12
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
MarketBeat · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Money Digest · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AEO currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AEO's estimated fair value is $19.30, which is 29.1% above the current price of $14.95. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AEO's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $19.30 vs. price $14.95 (+29.1%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.00.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.5% of price; Calmar: 0.01 (3y annualized return 0.8% / max drawdown 64.5%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -35.1%.
Yes — AEO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thanawala Ravi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 105,485 | +105,485 | — |
| Thanawala Ravi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 83,940 | +83,940 | — |
| Thanawala Ravi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 27,980 | +27,980 | — |
| Thanawala Ravi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 27,980 | +27,980 | — |
| Thanawala Ravi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 83,940 | +83,940 | — |
| Thanawala Ravi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 105,485 | +105,485 | — |
| PAGE JANICE E | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 27 | +27 | — |
| Foyle Jennifer M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 967 | +967 | — |
| MCMILLAN CARY D | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 1,344 | +1,344 | — |
| SCHOTTENSTEIN JAY L | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 1,889 | +1,889 | — |
| Sable David M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 349 | +349 | — |
| Mathias Michael A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 369 | +369 | — |
| Spiegel Noel Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 1,290 | +1,290 | — |
| Henke Beth M | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 168 | +168 | — |
| HENRETTA DEBORAH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 669 | +669 | — |
| Baldwin Marisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 203 | +203 | — |
| Keefer James H JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 143 | +143 | — |
| Baldwin Marisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 918 | +203 | — |
| MCMILLAN CARY D | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 184,173 | +1,344 | — |
| Henke Beth M | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 661 | +168 | — |
| PAGE JANICE E | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 3,713 | +27 | — |
| Foyle Jennifer M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 4,633 | +967 | — |
| Keefer James H JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 677 | +143 | — |
| Spiegel Noel Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 176,764 | +1,290 | — |
| Sable David M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 47,782 | +349 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
18,084,927 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 18,193,760 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
39.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology