Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$30.25
▼ $0.41 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:41 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$30.24 - $31.13
52-Week Range
$29.03 - $81.53
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$29.35
Resistance
$38.45
ZG is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-65.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 118.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $17.23 vs. price $30.25 (-43.0%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (65/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
33
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
13
Risk
40
Sentiment
8
Fundamental
40
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Zillow Group, Inc. has centered on its housing market trends, stock performance, and platform expansions. The company’s August report highlights how elevated interest rates are cooling home sales, while rental demand shows growth in out-of-town searches, particularly in Buffalo, Chicago, and Houston. Zillow also introduced an expanded rent-reporting program to aid renters in building credit, reinforcing its role in bridging rental and homeownership markets. Stock performance remains a focus, with Zillow’s shares rising post-earnings despite broader consumer stock struggles.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Zillow Group, Inc.. News trend score: 8. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 4 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
39
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
40
Technical
13
Valuation
33
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-7%
Market Narrative
28
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
-8
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant overconfidence (45) stems from a disconnect between ZG’s valuation (+92% above DCF) and its lagging price momentum, suggesting investors may overestimate future growth despite weak recent performance. The narrative gap (12) hints at a misalignment between optimistic expectations and fundamentals. Herding (25) reflects selective underperformance, while muted panic (20) and FOMO (2) indicate no broad panic or urgency. The key question: *Is the overvaluation justified by future catalysts, or will fundamentals correct the misplaced confidence?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:43 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Zillow's August Market Report shows elevated rates dampen home sales"
"Over the past six months, it seems like demand trends may be working against [consumer discretionary] businesses"
"Zillow's rent-reporting program... expanding its housing platform from rental search to homeownership goals"
"A surge in out-of-town rental searches points to Buffalo, Chicago and Houston as markets to watch"
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with some models seeing it as a cyclical opportunity and others flagging it as risky or overvalued. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay both rate it highly—Nelson sees it as oversold in its cycle, while Mackay detects no crowd mania, suggesting a contrarian or value-driven appeal. Conversely, the more conservative voices like Jesse Livermore and Morgan Housel reject it outright, with Livermore calling it a negative trend play and Housel dismissing it as volatile enough to deter patient investors. Meanwhile, the middle ground—represented by Howard Marks (cycle) and Walter Bagehot—acknowledges potential but with caveats, while Grahamite and Fisherian approaches outright dismiss it for lacking statistical cheapness or quality. The divergence stems from whether the stock’s cyclical positioning, liquidity, or growth signals justify the risk, or if it’s already priced for expectations that may not hold.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 85
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 84
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 73
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 43
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 43
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 42
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 34
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 23
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 10
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
74.1%
Operating Margin
-1.3%
Net Margin
0.9%
EBITDA Margin
8.9%
ROE
0.5%
ROA
0.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.09
Cash
$768.00M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
3.13
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$30.25
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$17.23
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-43.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
9.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.9% | $258.36M | $237.02M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $279.23M | $235.02M |
| 3 | 6.2% | $296.60M | $229.03M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $309.53M | $219.28M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $317.26M | $206.20M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$235.00M
Terminal Value
$5.00B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.25B
Enterprise Value
$4.38B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$4.38B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$19.22
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.01
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 5 neutral, 11 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 33/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ZG currently scores 33/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ZG's estimated fair value is $17.23, which is 43.0% below the current price of $30.25. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ZG's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 118.8%; Net income growth: 120.5%; Current ratio: 3.13.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $17.23 vs. price $30.25 (-43.0%); Operating margin: -1.3% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ZG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 23 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLACHFORD ERIK C | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 792 | -792 | $35.71 |
| Cormier Thielke Claire | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 1,187 | -1,187 | $35.71 |
| Knight Cassandra | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 70,852 | +70,852 | — |
| Knight Cassandra | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 212,553 | +212,553 | — |
| Wacksman Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 9,339 | -9,339 | $34.18 |
| Hofmann Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,661 | -5,661 | $34.18 |
| Spaulding Dan | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 3,169 | -3,169 | $35.37 |
| Samuelson Errol G | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 3,154 | -3,154 | $34.24 |
| Wacksman Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 5,786 | -5,786 | $34.24 |
| Beitel David A. | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 1,798 | -1,798 | $34.24 |
| Rock Jennifer | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 990 | -990 | $34.24 |
| Hofmann Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 3,510 | -3,510 | $34.24 |
| Spaulding Dan | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 1,966 | -1,966 | $34.24 |
| Cormier Thielke Claire | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 1,187 | -1,187 | $33.09 |
| BLACHFORD ERIK C | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 791 | -791 | $34.80 |
| BLACHFORD ERIK C | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 34,952 | -791 | $34.80 |
| Wacksman Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 9,072 | -9,072 | $36.54 |
| Wacksman Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 153,699 | -9,072 | $36.54 |
| Spaulding Dan | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 3,078 | -3,078 | $37.40 |
| Hofmann Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 5,501 | -5,501 | $37.40 |
| Hofmann Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 68,315 | -5,501 | $37.40 |
| Spaulding Dan | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 49,696 | -3,078 | $37.40 |
| Owens Bradley D. | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 65,245 | -3,364 | $37.23 |
| Beitel David A. | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 150 | -150 | $38.74 |
| Choo Jun | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 1,083 | -1,083 | $37.84 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,907,574 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,942,291 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology