Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$56.90
▲ $0.57 (+1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/30 07:40 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$1.95B
Day Range
$56.10 - $57.48
52-Week Range
$22.45 - $60.48
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$50.40
Resistance
$60.48
+49.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $101.51 vs. price $56.90 (+78.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.05 (3y annualized return -3.4% / max drawdown 62.6%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
63
Value
57
Momentum
56
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
55
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Ziff Davis, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
55
Technical
56
Valuation
57
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+9%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 64/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 21/100
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 64
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 57
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 56
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 55
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 48
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 47
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 44
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 32
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 26
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 23
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 289 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
85.8%
Operating Margin
12.6%
Net Margin
3.3%
EBITDA Margin
28.4%
ROE
2.7%
ROA
1.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.16
Cash
$607.01M
Total Debt
$866.50M
Current Ratio
1.27
Debt/Equity
0.49
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$56.90
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$101.51
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+78.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5% | $292.05M | $267.94M |
| 2 | 1.7% | $297.06M | $250.03M |
| 3 | 2.0% | $302.93M | $233.92M |
| 4 | 2.2% | $309.71M | $219.41M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $317.46M | $206.32M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$287.87M
Terminal Value
$5.01B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.25B
Enterprise Value
$4.43B
Net Debt
$259.49M
Equity Value
$4.17B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$42.67
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$4.82
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
StockStory · 31.8.2026
Motley Fool · 20.8.2026
Trefis · 19.8.2026
Business Wire · 18.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
MT Newswires · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ZD currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ZD's estimated fair value is $101.51, which is 78.4% above the current price of $56.90. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ZD's technical score is 56/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $101.51 vs. price $56.90 (+78.4%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.49.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.05 (3y annualized return -3.4% / max drawdown 62.6%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -19.0%; Net income growth: -24.9%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ZD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 20 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRETZMER W BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 20,000 | -2,513 | $55.31 |
| KRETZMER W BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 2,513 | -2,513 | $55.31 |
| TANSLEY LORI A. | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 767 | -1,400 | $54.76 |
| TANSLEY LORI A. | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 1,400 | -1,400 | $54.76 |
| ROSSEN JEREMY | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 10,643 | -3,819 | $54.93 |
| ROSSEN JEREMY | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 3,819 | -3,819 | $54.93 |
| RICHTER BRET | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 18,000 | -18,000 | $46.88 |
| RICHTER BRET | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 29,244 | -18,000 | $46.88 |
| McDonald Kirk P | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 100 | -100 | $46.66 |
| McDonald Kirk P | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 975 | -975 | $46.65 |
| McDonald Kirk P | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 13,568 | -975 | $46.65 |
| McDonald Kirk P | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 13,468 | -100 | $46.66 |
| ROSSEN JEREMY | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | $47.00 |
| ROSSEN JEREMY | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 14,462 | -8,000 | $47.00 |
| Barsten Jana | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 3,347 | -3,347 | $45.00 |
| Barsten Jana | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 12,513 | -3,347 | $45.00 |
| KRETZMER W BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 1,968 | -1,968 | $44.51 |
| KRETZMER W BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 22,513 | -1,968 | $44.51 |
| ROSSEN JEREMY | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 4,347 | -4,347 | $45.75 |
| ROSSEN JEREMY | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 22,462 | -4,347 | $45.75 |
| Ray Neville R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.5.2026 | 7,903 | +7,903 | $43.31 |
| Harris Teresa A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.5.2026 | 7,903 | +7,903 | $43.31 |
| KRETZMER W BRIAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.5.2026 | 7,903 | +7,903 | $43.31 |
| Barsten Jana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.5.2026 | 7,903 | +7,903 | $43.31 |
| FAY SARAH ANN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.5.2026 | 7,903 | +7,903 | $43.31 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,541,576 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,314,992 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
82.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 83.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology