Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$11.52
▼ $0.25 (-2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/18 08:06 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$11.29 - $11.63
52-Week Range
$6.47 - $12.93
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$8.97
Resistance
$12.93
+37.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $41.50 vs. price $11.52 (+260.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
42
Value
67
Momentum
42
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
51
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of AMC Global Media Inc. (AMCX) has primarily focused on its strong stock performance, with a notable 54.3% surge in share price over six months, reaching around $12.63. Analysts highlight AMCX as a potential breakout stock with promising earnings growth, though some caution investors about its business model amid discussions of stocks under $50. Comparisons to sector peers and mixed investment advice—both bullish and bearish—have also been featured.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AMC Global Media Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
51
Technical
42
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
44
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AMCX’s psychology is dominated by **Euphoria**, where investors appear detached from valuation (71% below DCF) while fixating on relative strength (22% above 200-day average). The **Confirmation Bias** (narrative gap +12) suggests selective attention to marginal positives (e.g., +0.1pp margin) while ignoring stagnant revenue. Weak momentum (-3.4% ROC) and neutral volume (0.90x) imply no urgency, but the lack of panic or herding hints at complacency. The key question: *Is the narrative gap closing, or will investors double down despite fundamental divergence?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:43 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AMCX emerges as potential breakout stock, backed by strong expected earnings growth"
"AMC Networks has been on fire lately... stock price has rocketed 54.3%"
"AMCX and Carter's (CRI) have performed compared to their sector so far this year"
"Stocks in the $10-50 range... AMCX offers a sweet spot between affordability and stability"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between value-focused and speculative methodologies. Benjamin Graham’s Enterprising Investor model scores it as a near-perfect ‘deep statistical discount,’ suggesting it meets aggressive value criteria, while his Defensive approach still finds it attractive—though less so. In contrast, growth-oriented thinkers like Peter Lynch and Thorstein Veblen see mixed signals, with Lynch noting the price already reflects much of its potential while Veblen questions whether growth translates to profit. Meanwhile, the market efficiency camp (Malkiel/Bogle) and cycle-sensitive investors (Marks, Nelson) flag it as overpriced or late-stage, warning against chasing momentum. At the other extreme, Fisher and Smith dismiss it outright for lacking the stability or quality they demand, while Housel’s volatility warning underscores a disconnect between patient, long-term thinking and the stock’s risk profile.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 96
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 77
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 65
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 35
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 24
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 13
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
50.6%
Operating Margin
11.4%
Net Margin
3.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
9.1%
ROA
2.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.01
Cash
$502.38M
Total Debt
$1.75B
Current Ratio
1.67
Debt/Equity
1.80
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$11.52
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$41.50
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+260.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $258.75M | $237.38M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $250.66M | $210.98M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $247.53M | $191.14M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $249.08M | $176.45M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $255.30M | $165.93M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$272.37M
Terminal Value
$4.03B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.62B
Enterprise Value
$3.60B
Net Debt
$1.25B
Equity Value
$2.35B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$23.00
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$45.43
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
StockStory · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
StockStory · 15.8.2026
AMC Global Media Inc. (AMCX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMCX currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMCX's estimated fair value is $41.50, which is 260.3% above the current price of $11.52. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMCX's technical score is 42/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $41.50 vs. price $11.52 (+260.3%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 132.5%; Net income growth: 139.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.3% of price; Calmar: -0.00 (3y annualized return -0.1% / max drawdown 73.1%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AMCX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lokhandwala Hozefa | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 19,511 | +19,511 | — |
| DOLAN JAMES LAWRENCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Cox Christopher James | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Perelman Debra Golding | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Blank Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Sweeney Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| DOLAN THOMAS CHARLES | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| TESE VINCENT | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| VOGEL CARL E | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Dolan Aidan J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| DOLAN JAMES LAWRENCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| TESE VINCENT | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| VOGEL CARL E | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| DOLAN-SWEENEY DEBORAH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Blank Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Perelman Debra Golding | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Cox Christopher James | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| DOLAN THOMAS CHARLES | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Dolan Aidan J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 10,926 | +10,926 | — |
| Romanello Salvatore | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.3.2026 | 50,378 | +50,378 | — |
| McDermott Dan | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.3.2026 | 100,756 | +100,756 | — |
| Kelleher Kimberly | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.3.2026 | 88,161 | +88,161 | — |
| Sherin Michael J. III | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.3.2026 | 21,411 | +21,411 | — |
| Dolan Kristin A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.3.2026 | 503,778 | +503,778 | — |
| DOLAN JAMES LAWRENCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.3.2026 | 503,778 | +503,778 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,925,142 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,852,585 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology