Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$1.76
▲ $0.10 (+6.0%)
Market data updated: 10/01 01:25 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/11/2026
News analyzed: 10/01/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$1.57 - $1.82
52-Week Range
—
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$1.02
Resistance
$2.15
YYGH is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-99.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
MACD
MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$0.86 vs. price $1.76 (-149.1%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
37
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
18
Institutional
67
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of YY Group Holding Limited—now operating under the rebranded name YYForce—has centered on its strategic pivot toward AI-driven automation and human-robot integration. Key developments include the launch of Facadevision AI, an automated exterior maintenance system using drones, and the appointment of Andrew Davison as Chief Strategic Officer to accelerate growth. The company also announced a Nasdaq ticker change to "YFOR" as part of its transformation into a tech-focused entity. No other substantive details beyond these moves were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about YY Group Holding Limited. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
18
Technical
37
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-64%
Market Narrative
77
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
👥 What the crowd believes
"YY Group Enters New Era as YYForce, Expanding AI, Automation and Human-Robot Workforce Strategy; Nasdaq Ticker Changes to 'YFOR'"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a stark divide among methodologies, with some models seeing potential in its market positioning while others flag fundamental or structural red flags. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) both rate it favorably—Nelson sees it as oversold and near a cycle bottom, while Marks views it as early-to-mid cycle, suggesting room for upside. However, Charles Mackay’s lower score warns of crowd-driven excitement, hinting at speculative bubbles, while Benjamin Graham and his variants dismiss it as lacking the deep value or clear margin of safety they demand. Meanwhile, Fisher’s zero score and Housel’s volatility warning underscore a lack of enduring quality or patient-investor appeal, while Livermore and Bagehot’s low scores highlight liquidity and trend risks that would deter aggressive or contrarian traders. The contrast between cyclical bullishness and deep-value skepticism reveals a stock that may appeal to momentum-driven or macro-oriented investors but fails to meet the rigorous standards of fundamentalists or patient long-term holders.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 85
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 68
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 56
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 53
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 47
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 25
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 23
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 18
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 15
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
13.8%
Operating Margin
-37.9%
Net Margin
-37.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-208.0%
ROA
-62.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.14
Cash
$836.91K
Total Debt
$144.37K
Current Ratio
0.90
Debt/Equity
0.73
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.76
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$0.86
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-149.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $-1.76M | $-1.62M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $-1.91M | $-1.60M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $-2.03M | $-1.56M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $-2.11M | $-1.50M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-2.17M | $-1.41M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-1.60M
Terminal Value
$-34.18M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-22.21M
Enterprise Value
$-29.91M
Net Debt
$-692.54K
Equity Value
$-29.21M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.04
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.02
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 4 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 8.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
ChartMill · 31.8.2026
PR Newswire · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 26.8.2026
ChartMill · 26.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
ChartMill · 26.8.2026
ChartMill · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
ChartMill · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
YY Group Holding Limited (YYGH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
YYGH currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, YYGH's estimated fair value is -$0.86, which is 149.1% below the current price of $1.76. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
YYGH's technical score is 37/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; ROC 12 days: 11.3%; CMF 20 days: 0.30.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$0.86 vs. price $1.76 (-149.1%); Operating margin: -37.9% (negative); Net margin: -37.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for YYGH.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 8 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 12 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 18.6.2026 | 4,953,317 | +2,176,347 | $0.08 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 18.6.2026 | 2,176,347 | +2,176,347 | $0.08 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 17.6.2026 | 2,776,970 | +555,884 | $0.13 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 17.6.2026 | 555,884 | +555,884 | $0.13 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 16.6.2026 | 2,221,086 | +1,937,244 | $0.14 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 16.6.2026 | 1,937,244 | +1,937,244 | $0.14 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 314,389 | -1,523,686 | $0.12 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 1,523,686 | -1,523,686 | $0.12 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 1,838,075 | -225,191 | $0.13 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 225,191 | -225,191 | $0.13 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2026 | 2,063,266 | +2,159,052 | $0.15 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2026 | 2,159,052 | +2,159,052 | $0.15 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
480,640 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 214,381 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology