Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$69.65
▼ $0.34 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/21 03:05 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$25.86B
Day Range
$69.27 - $70.08
52-Week Range
$62.87 - $78.96
Beta
—
Next Earnings
19.10.2026
Support
$67.36
Resistance
$77.45
WRB is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
-4.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/22 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.9% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
6d ago · $70.87
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 18 to 44 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
72
Risk
58
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
53
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING WRB...
Recent media coverage on **W. R. Berkley Corporation** is limited, with no direct headlines or analyses specifically about the company in the provided sources. The available articles focus instead on broader insurance sector trends—such as underwriting discipline, commercial growth, and bond market opportunities—without mentioning W. R. Berkley directly. No notable events or recurring themes about the company itself are present in these headlines.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about W. R. Berkley Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
53
Technical
72
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (score 49) reflects traders’ fixation on the 2.6% support level, likely due to its proximity. The narrative gap (15) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations (53) and subdued reality (38), possibly reinforcing anchoring. Low FOMO/Euphoria scores (10) despite positive sentiment suggest cautious optimism rather than blind enthusiasm. The key question: will traders break free from the support anchor, or will the gap widen further?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:49 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"W.R. Berkley's underwriting discipline and specialty expertise could help sustain strong margins as insurance pricing softens"
"W.R. Berkley demonstrates robust financials with $45.67B in assets, $452.3M net income, and consistent EPS growth"
"yields on Baby Bonds are near their highest levels in more than 15 years, offering rates comparable to junk bonds but with higher credit quality"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some investors seeing strong potential while others dismiss it outright. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd-behavior analysis (82) and Morgan Housel’s patient-compounder framework (74)—suggest it avoids speculative frenzy and could suit long-term holders, while Edgar Lawrence Smith (70) and Gerald Loeb (66) also view it as a stable, buy-and-hold candidate. However, more cautious or value-focused strategies like Benjamin Graham’s (39) and Peter Lynch’s (9) outright reject it, arguing it fails core defensive or growth-at-a-reasonable-price criteria. Meanwhile, market-efficiency proponents (38) and Fisher’s quality-growth model (33) see little edge over passive investing or traditional blue-chip traits, leaving it in a middle ground where only the most flexible or opportunistic investors might find merit.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 70
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 70
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 39
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 9
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
12.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
18.3%
ROA
4.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.48
Cash
$2.54B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 23.6.2026 | $0.600 |
| 22.6.2026 | $0.600 |
| 23.2.2026 | $0.090 |
| 22.2.2026 | $0.090 |
| 15.12.2025 | $1.090 |
| 14.12.2025 | $1.090 |
| 22.9.2025 | $0.090 |
| 21.9.2025 | $0.090 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.590 |
| 22.6.2025 | $0.590 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.080 |
| 2.3.2025 | $0.080 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$24.26
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Barchart · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
MT Newswires · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WRB currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
WRB's technical score is 72/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.9% of price; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend; Return on assets (ROA): 4.0% — weak.
Yes — WRB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BERKLEY WILLIAM R JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 4,139 | -4,139 | $72.29 |
| SHIEL JAMES G | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 14,086 | +14,086 | — |
| BERKLEY WILLIAM R JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 98,593 | +98,593 | — |
| Welt Philip S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 592 | -592 | $72.29 |
| Baio Richard Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 14,086 | +14,086 | — |
| Baio Richard Mark | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 650 | -650 | $72.29 |
| SHIEL JAMES G | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 650 | -650 | $72.29 |
| Welt Philip S | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 14,086 | +14,086 | — |
| SHIEL JAMES G | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 811,283 | +14,086 | — |
| SHIEL JAMES G | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 810,633 | -650 | $72.29 |
| BERKLEY WILLIAM R JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 4,654,453 | +98,593 | — |
| BERKLEY WILLIAM R JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 4,650,314 | -4,139 | $72.29 |
| Baio Richard Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 228,261 | +14,086 | — |
| Baio Richard Mark | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 227,611 | -650 | $72.29 |
| Welt Philip S | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 214,625 | +14,086 | — |
| Welt Philip S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 214,033 | -592 | $72.29 |
| Farrell Mary C | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
| BERKLEY WILLIAM R | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
| Augostini Christopher L | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
| Talisman Jonathan | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
| Mosley Daniel Lynn | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
| Rusbuldt Robert Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
| Mattson Marie Angela | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
| BLAYLOCK RONALD E | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
| BERKLEY WILLIAM R JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,090 | +3,090 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,177,596 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,608,018 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology