Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$70.90
▼ $1.05 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/17 12:41 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$86.72B
Day Range
$69.85 - $71.98
52-Week Range
$56.19 - $80.08
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
WMB is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+22.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $13.14 vs. price $70.90 (-81.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
26
Risk
50
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
59
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING WMB...
Recent media coverage of Williams Companies has centered on its $5.5 billion acquisition of Momentum Midstream, finalized in early September 2026, which significantly expands its natural gas infrastructure in the Haynesville Basin. The deal aims to bolster Williams’ position in a key U.S. gas supply region while supporting growing demand in the Gulf Coast for LNG and power. Analysts highlight the company’s strong stock performance—up 21.86% year-to-date and 33.75% over the past year—while also discussing its dividend reliability amid broader midstream sector scrutiny.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Williams Companies. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
59
Technical
26
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
WMB’s psychology suggests a dominant herd mentality, amplified by peer outperformance and euphoric valuation (+472% above DCF). Overconfidence and anchoring further imply traders may chase gains near resistance while ignoring fundamental gaps. The narrative gap (78 vs. 41) hints at detached optimism, but the key question remains: will momentum sustain or collapse under valuation extremes? The absence of panic or loss aversion signals reinforces complacency despite the disconnect between price and fundamentals.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:28 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"WMB's $5.5 billion Momentum Midstream deal expands its Haynesville network, strengthening links to Gulf Coast LNG, power and industrial demand."
"Williams Companies has seen firm momentum build over 2026, with a year-to-date share price return of 21.86%."
"The deal significantly increases Williams Companies' footprint in one of the fastest growing U.S. natural gas supply basins."
"High midstream yields look tempting until a payout cut wipes out a year of income."
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for WMB reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors prioritize risk, valuation, and market context. Edgar Lawrence Smith’s high score suggests he’d see this as a long-term, value-driven opportunity, while Thorstein Veblen’s alignment with real economic growth aligns with a more fundamental, value-creation lens—both leaning bullish. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher and Jesse Livermore’s lukewarm scores highlight their stricter standards for quality and trend clarity, respectively, leaving them skeptical of the stock’s attractiveness. The lower scores from Graham, Bagehot, and the Enterprising Investor framework underscore a consensus that the stock’s valuation or liquidity risks are too pronounced for defensive or statistically disciplined investors, while Howard Marks’ late-cycle caution and Morgan Housel’s volatility concerns point to macroeconomic or behavioral red flags. The contrast between Smith’s 'buy-and-hold' enthusiasm and the near-unanimous skepticism of the more risk-averse methodologies underscores how valuation, growth expectations, and market timing shape wildly different conclusions.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 88
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 81
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 69
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 62
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 41
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 21
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$68.52
Range Bottom
$76.86
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
35.1%
Net Margin
21.9%
EBITDA Margin
54.8%
ROE
20.4%
ROA
4.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.14
Cash
$63.00M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.53
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.525 |
| 12.6.2026 | $0.525 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.525 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.525 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.525 |
| 12.12.2025 | $0.500 |
| 11.12.2025 | $0.500 |
| 12.9.2025 | $0.500 |
| 11.9.2025 | $0.500 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$70.90
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$13.14
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-81.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.2% | $1.04B | $951.35M |
| 2 | 3.0% | $1.07B | $899.08M |
| 3 | 2.8% | $1.10B | $848.27M |
| 4 | 2.7% | $1.13B | $799.01M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.16B | $751.37M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.00B
Terminal Value
$18.23B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$11.85B
Enterprise Value
$16.10B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$16.10B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$10.45
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.07
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
CNW Group · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Williams Companies (WMB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WMB currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WMB's estimated fair value is $13.14, which is 81.5% below the current price of $70.90. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WMB's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Calmar: 2.14 (3y annualized return 27.7% / max drawdown 12.9%); Return on equity (ROE): 20.4% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $13.14 vs. price $70.90 (-81.5%); Current ratio: 0.53; Free cash flow growth: -58.1%.
Yes — WMB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $75.56 |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Gift | 14.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | — |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 10,200 | -10,200 | $74.88 |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Gift | 14.8.2026 | 1,900 | -1,900 | — |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 2,800 | -2,800 | $74.84 |
| Wingo Robert R. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 8,226 | -8,226 | $71.76 |
| Wingo Robert R. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 48,343 | -8,226 | $71.76 |
| Helms Lloyd W Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 2,785 | +2,785 | $71.81 |
| Turner Robb E | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 2,785 | +2,785 | $71.81 |
| Turner Robb E | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 8,785 | +2,785 | $71.81 |
| Helms Lloyd W Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 2,785 | +2,785 | $71.81 |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $70.65 |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 281,159 | -2,000 | $70.65 |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $74.16 |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 283,159 | -2,000 | $74.16 |
| Porter John Dean | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.6.2026 | 1,899 | +1,899 | $24.98 |
| Porter John Dean | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.6.2026 | 1,899 | -1,899 | $24.98 |
| Porter John Dean | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.6.2026 | 1,176 | -1,176 | $77.62 |
| Porter John Dean | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.6.2026 | 198,466 | +1,899 | $24.98 |
| Porter John Dean | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.6.2026 | 197,290 | -1,176 | $77.62 |
| Porter John Dean | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.6.2026 | 0 | -1,899 | $24.98 |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $71.30 |
| Wilson Terrance Lane | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 285,159 | -2,000 | $71.30 |
| BERGSTROM STEPHEN W | Gift | 19.5.2026 | 16,400 | -16,400 | — |
| BERGSTROM STEPHEN W | Gift | 19.5.2026 | 198,605 | -16,400 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
26,153,338 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 26,476,801 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
36.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 35.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology