Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$77.21
▼ $1.69 (-2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/29 01:15 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$1.18B
Day Range
$76.70 - $78.76
52-Week Range
$64.67 - $137.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$67.18
Resistance
$89.33
WLDN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-19.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $102.27 vs. price $77.21 (+32.5%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
25d ago · $87.07
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
25d ago · $87.07
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 2, 2026
Then
75
$87.34
Now
57
$77.21
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
63
Value
62
Momentum
13
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Willdan Group, Inc. has centered on its financial performance and strategic growth. The company reported strong Q2 earnings, exceeding expectations and signaling market expansion plans. Analysts, including Wedbush’s Steven Wahrhaftig, reiterated an *Outperform* rating with a $130 price target, praising its acquisition of KCS Corporation, an engineering consultancy, to bolster substation and power delivery capabilities. Additionally, an insider sold shares worth over $5 million, while the stock briefly gained traction in after-market sessions alongside other industrials.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Willdan Group, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
16
Fundamentals
64
Technical
13
Valuation
62
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
WLDN’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, as traders appear fixated on the 2.4% gap below resistance despite modest momentum and positive sentiment. The narrative-reality gap (14 points) hints at overestimation of bullish catalysts, while loss aversion lingers from the 9.8% prior drop. FOMO and euphoria coexist but are muted by valuation disconnects. The key question: will traders break resistance or retreat if momentum stalls?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Willdan's KCS acquisition seen accelerating substation backlog conversion"
"Wedbush reiterates Willdan Group with an Outperform and maintains $130 price target"
"Willdan Reports Q2 Beat Across the Board, Looks to Enter New Markets"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about its potential. Peter Lynch’s near-perfect score and 'growth candidate' label suggest he sees untapped upside in the stock’s price lagging behind its earnings growth, while Edgar Lawrence Smith and Thorstein Veblen also lean bullish, though slightly more cautiously, emphasizing long-term value alignment and organic growth. Conversely, Benjamin Graham’s low scores and 'defensive failure' verdict highlight the stock’s lack of traditional safety margins, a red flag for value investors prioritizing margin of safety. Meanwhile, the efficient-market camp and Nelson’s cycle analysis flag overvaluation or speculative risk, while Livermore’s neutral stance and Schwager’s indecision underscore the absence of clear technical or trend-based conviction. The debate hinges on whether the stock’s growth justifies its valuation (Lynch, Smith) or if it’s overpriced (Graham, Nelson) or simply unprovably beatable (efficient-market theorists).
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 94
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 68
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 64
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 56
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 45
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 23
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
37.5%
Operating Margin
6.5%
Net Margin
7.7%
EBITDA Margin
9.2%
ROE
17.2%
ROA
9.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.63
Cash
$65.92M
Total Debt
$48.46M
Current Ratio
1.56
Debt/Equity
0.16
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$77.21
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$102.27
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+32.5%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
16.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.7% | $82.54M | $75.72M |
| 2 | 13.2% | $93.42M | $78.63M |
| 3 | 9.6% | $102.41M | $79.08M |
| 4 | 6.1% | $108.62M | $76.95M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $111.33M | $72.36M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$70.70M
Terminal Value
$1.76B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.14B
Enterprise Value
$1.52B
Net Debt
$-17.46M
Equity Value
$1.54B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$20.23
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$5.96
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
MT Newswires · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Business Wire · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 22.9.2026
MT Newswires · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
Business Wire · 17.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
MarketBeat · 7.8.2026
MT Newswires · 7.8.2026
MT Newswires · 7.8.2026
Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WLDN currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WLDN's estimated fair value is $102.27, which is 32.5% above the current price of $77.21. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WLDN's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $102.27 vs. price $77.21 (+32.5%); Revenue growth (last year): 20.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 120.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for WLDN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.9.2026 | 0 | -22,635 | — |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.9.2026 | 119,322 | +22,635 | $16.27 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.9.2026 | 101,592 | +4,905 | $16.27 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 97,587 | -4,005 | $79.01 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 96,687 | -900 | $80.91 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.9.2026 | 22,635 | -4,905 | — |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 96,687 | -3,439 | $88.19 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.9.2026 | 27,540 | -3,439 | — |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.9.2026 | 100,126 | +3,439 | $16.27 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.9.2026 | 3,439 | -3,439 | — |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.9.2026 | 3,439 | +3,439 | $16.27 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 3,439 | -3,439 | $88.19 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 30,979 | -58,727 | — |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 155,444 | +58,757 | $16.27 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 96,687 | -58,757 | $88.14 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 58,757 | -58,757 | $88.14 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 58,757 | +58,757 | $16.27 |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 58,727 | -58,727 | — |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,241 | +1,241 | — |
| Downes Cynthia | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,241 | +1,241 | — |
| McGinn Dennis V | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,241 | +1,241 | — |
| REDER WANDA KAY | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,241 | +1,241 | — |
| Cohen Steven A | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,241 | +1,241 | — |
| Shahidehpour Mohammad | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,241 | +1,241 | — |
| Brisbin Thomas Donald | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 96,687 | +1,241 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,010,919 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 2,116,268 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology