Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$0.46
▲ $0.01 (+1.3%)
Market data updated: 10/01 12:10 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$7.08M
Day Range
$0.45 - $0.46
52-Week Range
$0.37 - $3.90
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$0.37
Resistance
$0.84
WKSP is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-86.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 89.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -116.8% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
40
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
36
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Worksport, Ltd. has primarily focused on its expansion into new sales channels and financial updates. The company announced the availability of its COR Energy System through Amazon, aiming to broaden its reach in portable power, home backup, and off-grid energy markets. Additionally, Worksport reported its Q2 2026 earnings, with discussions on operating results, growth strategies, and its path toward cash-flow positivity. No other significant company-specific details were highlighted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Worksport, Ltd.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
47
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
36
Technical
40
Valuation
55
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-51%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
47
Narrative Gap
+18
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by Loss Aversion, as the 51% three-month decline and restrained volume suggest investors are hesitant to crystallize losses. Despite euphoric news sentiment, the stock remains far below its 200-day average, reinforcing caution. The narrative gap (65 vs. 47) hints at a disconnect where optimism may not yet translate into aggressive buying. The key question: *Will the gap close if momentum shifts, or will loss aversion persist?*
Updated: 10/01/2026, 12:11 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"New Amazon sales channel expands COR's sales reach beyond Worksport's web platform, to the world's largest retail market"
"Worksport (NASDAQ:WKSP) reported second-quarter financial results... transcript from the company’s second-quarter earnings call"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 27/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Benjamin Graham’s models overwhelmingly endorsing it as a high-conviction opportunity—both for defensive and enterprising investors—due to its apparent statistical undervaluation. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch’s growth-focused approach also leans bullish, suggesting the stock’s price hasn’t yet reflected its underlying momentum. However, more cautious frameworks like Howard Marks’ mixed verdict and Philip Fisher’s lukewarm score highlight potential pitfalls: either inflated expectations or a lack of Fisher’s signature quality/growth traits. At the opposite end, volatility-sensitive thinkers like Morgan Housel and trend-followers like Jesse Livermore dismiss it outright, warning of overreach or downside risk, while mid-cycle observers like Nelson and Schwager remain neutral, unable to find decisive signals.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 94
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 71
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 44
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 290 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
27.8%
Operating Margin
-116.8%
Net Margin
-120.2%
EBITDA Margin
-105.4%
ROE
-84.6%
ROA
-63.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$3.16
Cash
$5.95M
Total Debt
$4.36M
Current Ratio
2.50
Debt/Equity
0.19
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$0.46
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$74.94
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-22.63M | $-20.76M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-27.01M | $-22.74M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-30.73M | $-23.73M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-33.23M | $-23.54M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-34.06M | $-22.13M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-18.10M
Terminal Value
$-537.04M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-349.04M
Enterprise Value
$-461.94M
Net Debt
$-1.58M
Equity Value
$-460.35M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.72
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 30.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
Associated Press · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Worksport, Ltd. (WKSP) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WKSP currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
WKSP's technical score is 40/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 89.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 45.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -116.8% (negative); Net margin: -120.2% (negative); ATR: 9.9% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for WKSP.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 24 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kartychak Jennifer Anne | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.7.2026 | 143,000 | +143,000 | — |
| Kartychak Jennifer Anne | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.7.2026 | 168,872 | +143,000 | — |
| Rossi Steven F. | Open Market Purchase | 5.6.2026 | 79,618 | +79,618 | $0.63 |
| Rossi Steven F. | Open Market Purchase | 5.6.2026 | 2,693,703 | +79,618 | $0.63 |
| Kartychak Jennifer Anne | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 6,104 | +6,104 | $1.15 |
| Kartychak Jennifer Anne | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 25,872 | +6,104 | $1.15 |
| Rossi Steven F. | Open Market Purchase | 13.4.2026 | 88,214 | +88,214 | $0.85 |
| Rossi Steven F. | Open Market Purchase | 13.4.2026 | 2,614,085 | +88,214 | $0.85 |
| Loverock Craig William | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 25,002 | +25,002 | $1.66 |
| SIEGEL NED L | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 25,002 | +25,002 | $1.66 |
| Rossi Lorenzo | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 15,000 | +15,000 | $1.66 |
| Caragol William J | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 25,002 | +25,002 | $1.66 |
| Rossi Steven F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 240,000 | +240,000 | $1.66 |
| SIEGEL NED L | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 61,752 | +25,002 | $1.66 |
| Loverock Craig William | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 61,752 | +25,002 | $1.66 |
| Rossi Lorenzo | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 65,000 | +15,000 | $1.66 |
| Caragol William J | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 101,752 | +25,002 | $1.66 |
| Rossi Steven F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 850,000 | +240,000 | $1.66 |
| Rossi Steven F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.7.2025 | 215,000 | +215,000 | — |
| SIEGEL NED L | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.7.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Rossi Lorenzo | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.7.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Caragol William J | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.7.2025 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| Loverock Craig William | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.7.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Rossi Steven F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.4.2025 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
365,506 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,038,600 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
39.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology