Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$86.12
▼ $0.77 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:58 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$260.43B
Day Range
$85.97 - $86.74
52-Week Range
$72.78 - $97.76
Beta
—
Next Earnings
13.10.2026
Support
$83.48
Resistance
$91.99
WFC is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+3.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/21 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $89.19
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 4 to 31 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
57
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
38
Risk
50
Sentiment
20
Fundamental
51
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING WFC...
Recent media coverage of Wells Fargo has primarily focused on its stock valuation and investor appeal, with analysts suggesting its shares may be undervalued despite a strong 137.3% return over the past three years. The bank’s preferred shares are also highlighted as attractive during periods of interest rate volatility. Additionally, Wells Fargo was noted for its recent dividend payment, which stood out among other major companies. No other substantive operational or financial developments were prominently covered.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Wells Fargo. News trend score: 20. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 6 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
51
Technical
38
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
31
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-19
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring (92) suggests traders are fixated on the near-resistance level, likely due to its proximity. Herding (52) hints at relative underperformance compared to peers, while FOMO (39) and euphoria (15) indicate cautious optimism from momentum and sentiment. Overconfidence (11) may stem from price outperforming fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders break the resistance anchor or hold near it?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wells Fargo stock has delivered a strong 137.3% return over the past 3 years, yet several valuation checks still suggest the shares may trade below an internally estimated intrinsic value."
"Wells Fargo preferred shares remain attractive for investors."
"shareholders of Wells Fargo Just Paid Shareholders. Here’s What They Got."
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 28/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for WFC reveal a stark divide between those who see *some* merit in the stock and those who would avoid it outright. Lynch, Smith, and Graham (value-focused) all lean toward cautious optimism, suggesting the stock has growth potential but may already be priced for it—reflecting a middle-ground assessment where fundamentals are decent but not transformative. In contrast, the more disciplined or market-skeptical frameworks—like Schwager’s quantitative rigor, Marks’ late-cycle caution, or Nelson’s overbought cycle warning—flatly dismiss it, scoring it near the bottom. Even Fisher and Bagehot, who typically demand deep qualitative or structural insights, lack sufficient conviction, while Mackay’s crowd psychology flag and Veblen’s profit ambiguity further muddy the waters. The efficient-market camp (Malkiel/Bogle) and Housel’s behavioral lens also downplay it, framing it as neither a clear outperformance candidate nor a must-own. The split underscores whether one prioritizes *relative* attractiveness (Lynch, Smith) or *absolute* risk/valuation discipline (Schwager, Marks-cycle), with no single methodology overwhelmingly endorsing the stock.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 83
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 64
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 60
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 48
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 37
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 33
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 28
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$83.48
Range Bottom
$91.99
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
11.8%
ROA
1.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.34
Cash
$172.59B
Total Debt
$193.03B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.07
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.8.2026 | $0.500 |
| 8.5.2026 | $0.450 |
| 7.5.2026 | $0.450 |
| 6.2.2026 | $0.450 |
| 5.2.2026 | $0.450 |
| 7.11.2025 | $0.450 |
| 6.11.2025 | $0.450 |
| 8.8.2025 | $0.450 |
| 7.8.2025 | $0.450 |
| 9.5.2025 | $0.400 |
| 8.5.2025 | $0.400 |
| 7.2.2025 | $0.400 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$55.86
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$48.16
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 3 neutral, 11 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Wells Fargo (WFC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WFC currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
WFC's technical score is 38/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average; +2.8% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 16.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — WFC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowers Derek A. | Gift | 15.7.2026 | 67,966 | +67,966 | — |
| Flowers Derek A. | Gift | 15.7.2026 | 67,966 | -67,966 | — |
| Flowers Derek A. | Gift | 15.7.2026 | 0 | -67,966 | — |
| Flowers Derek A. | Gift | 15.7.2026 | 341,740 | +67,966 | — |
| Hewett Wayne M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 421.806 | +421.806 | $85.94 |
| SARGENT RONALD | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 494.531 | +494.531 | $85.94 |
| BLACK STEVEN D | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 1,076.332 | +1,076.332 | $85.94 |
| SARGENT RONALD | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 71,135 | +495 | $85.94 |
| BLACK STEVEN D | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 58,079 | +1,076 | $85.94 |
| Hewett Wayne M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 42,014 | +422 | $85.94 |
| Rosenberg Jason M. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.6.2026 | 17,217.804 | +17,217.804 | — |
| Rosenberg Jason M. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.6.2026 | 8,079.493 | -8,079.493 | $83.73 |
| Rosenberg Jason M. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.6.2026 | 17,217.804 | -17,217.804 | — |
| WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN | Other Transaction | 10.6.2026 | 750 | -750 | — |
| CRAVER THEODORE F JR | Gift | 14.5.2026 | 89 | -89 | — |
| CRAVER THEODORE F JR | Gift | 14.5.2026 | 89 | +89 | — |
| CRAVER THEODORE F JR | Gift | 14.5.2026 | 0 | -89 | — |
| CRAVER THEODORE F JR | Gift | 14.5.2026 | 27,201 | +89 | — |
| SARGENT RONALD | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 3,436 | +3,436 | $81.50 |
| Vautrinot Suzanne M | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 3,436 | +3,436 | $81.50 |
| GARCIA FABIAN T | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 3,436 | +3,436 | $81.50 |
| Morken CeCelia | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 3,436 | +3,436 | $81.50 |
| DAVIS RICHARD K | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 3,436 | +3,436 | $81.50 |
| Norwood Felicia F | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 3,436 | +3,436 | $81.50 |
| Morris Maria R | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 3,436 | +3,436 | $81.50 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
33,929,528 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 28,452,806 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology