Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$48.41
▲ $1.27 (+2.7%)
Market data updated: 10/01 01:01 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$48.11 - $49.32
52-Week Range
$27.25 - $49.32
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$37.00
Resistance
$49.32
WEYS is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
+60.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): -4.9%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $48.41
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 11 to 51 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
88
Risk
56
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
63
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Weyco Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: WEYS) has primarily focused on its second-quarter 2026 earnings performance, highlighting a year-over-year revenue surge driven by growth in its Florsheim shoe brand and tariff refunds, which significantly improved margins to around 70%. Insider activity was also notable, with executives—including VPs Katherine Destinon, Brian Flannery, and Kevin Schiff—exercising or selling stock options worth tens of thousands of dollars, reflecting internal confidence or strategic moves. Analysts briefly mentioned the company alongside tech giants like Meta and CrowdStrike, though its valuation (over 15x EV/NOPAT) drew scrutiny for potential overvaluation relative to underlying business progress.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Weyco Group, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 18 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
45
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
62
Fundamentals
63
Technical
88
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+23
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
WEYS’s psychology is dominated by Euphoria, driven by a 21.9% premium to its 200-day average and positive sentiment (86/100), despite trading 7% below DCF fair value. The Confirmation Bias (narrative gap +10) suggests investors may be selectively ignoring flat fundamentals, while Herding (+2.7% vs. peers) indicates relative outperformance is attracting attention. The absence of panic or loss aversion signals implies no urgent liquidation pressure, though weak momentum (-0.9% ROC) hints at caution. The key question: *Will the narrative gap widen further, or will fundamentals begin to weigh on sentiment?*
Updated: 09/06/2026, 01:39 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Tariff Refunds Boost Margins to 70%"
"Weyco's Q2 Earnings Soar Y/Y on Florsheim Growth"
"Brian Flannery exercised options resulting in $46K gain"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for WEYS reflects deep methodological disagreements between risk-focused and trend-sensitive investors. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights the company’s liquidity resilience, suggesting it could weather financial stress—a hallmark of his banking-centric approach. In contrast, trend-followers like Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager reject it outright, with Livermore’s score of 65 signaling no clear directional momentum and Schwager’s 35 flagging a lack of disciplined setup. Meanwhile, value-oriented investors like Benjamin Graham (51) and Howard Marks (50) see mixed potential, questioning whether the stock’s valuation justifies its risk, while Fisher (25) and Lynch (20) dismiss it for lacking the growth or quality they prioritize. At the other extreme, behavioral economists like Mackay (41) and Veblen (26) warn of speculative bubbles or irrational exuberance, while cycle-aware thinkers like Marks (26) and Nelson (4) see it as overbought or late-stage, contrasting sharply with Bagehot’s liquidity-driven optimism.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 65
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 59
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 51
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 41
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 35
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 33
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 26
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 25
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 21
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 4
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
43.2%
Operating Margin
10.6%
Net Margin
8.4%
EBITDA Margin
11.6%
ROE
9.6%
ROA
7.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.44
Cash
$96.01M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
4.22
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.8.2026 | $0.280 |
| 19.5.2026 | $0.280 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.280 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.270 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.270 |
| 17.11.2025 | $2.270 |
| 16.11.2025 | $2.270 |
| 18.8.2025 | $0.270 |
| 17.8.2025 | $0.270 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.270 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.270 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.260 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$48.41
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$49.04
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+1.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $33.73M | $30.94M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $32.67M | $27.50M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $32.27M | $24.91M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $32.47M | $23.00M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $33.28M | $21.63M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$35.50M
Terminal Value
$524.78M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$341.07M
Enterprise Value
$469.06M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$469.06M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$25.05
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.75
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 18 articles.
Benzinga · 29.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Zacks · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 5.8.2026
MarketBeat · 5.8.2026
Moby · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Associated Press · 4.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 8.6.2026
Zacks · 19.5.2026
Zacks · 18.5.2026
Weyco Group, Inc. (WEYS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WEYS currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WEYS's estimated fair value is $49.04, which is 1.3% above the current price of $48.41. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WEYS's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 4.22; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): -4.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -23.7%; Free cash flow growth: -2.3%.
Yes — WEYS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Judy | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 15,341 | -1,555 | $44.00 |
| Combs Dustin | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 3,786 | -308 | $44.36 |
| Combs Dustin | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 4,094 | -290 | $44.17 |
| Combs Dustin | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 290 | -290 | $44.17 |
| Chang Tina M | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 17,833 | -3,000 | $45.07 |
| Chang Tina M | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $45.07 |
| Combs Dustin | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 4,384 | -1,096 | $44.64 |
| Combs Dustin | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,096 | -1,096 | $44.64 |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W | Z | 26.8.2026 | 2,445 | -310 | — |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W | Z | 26.8.2026 | 935,349 | +310 | — |
| STRATTON FREDERICK P JR | Z | 26.8.2026 | 2,445 | -310 | — |
| STRATTON FREDERICK P JR | Z | 26.8.2026 | 105,827 | +310 | — |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W | Z | 26.8.2026 | 310 | +310 | — |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W | Z | 26.8.2026 | 310 | -310 | — |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W | Z | 25.8.2026 | 935,039 | +2,390 | — |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W | Z | 25.8.2026 | 2,755 | -2,390 | — |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 5,145 | +1,265 | — |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 810,794 | +2,080 | — |
| STRATTON FREDERICK P JR | Z | 25.8.2026 | 2,755 | -2,390 | — |
| Anderson Judy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 16,896 | -437 | $45.58 |
| Anderson Judy | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 17,333 | +1,360 | — |
| FLORSHEIM THOMAS W JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 809,948 | -846 | $45.58 |
| Nettles Cory L | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.8.2026 | 16,529 | +1,265 | — |
| FLORSHEIM JOHN W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 25.8.2026 | 432,251 | -801 | $45.58 |
| STRATTON FREDERICK P JR | Z | 25.8.2026 | 105,517 | +2,390 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
146,972 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 120,643 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
68.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 70.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology