Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$0.24
▲ $0.01 (+3.2%)
Market data updated: 09/17 10:42 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$4.85M
Day Range
$0.23 - $0.24
52-Week Range
$0.17 - $7.20
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
AGRZ is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
-92.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 25.6% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $0.18 vs. price $0.24 (-24.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
50
Quality
42
Value
43
Momentum
35
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Agroz Inc. has primarily focused on two key developments: the company’s recent receipt of a **Nasdaq Staff Determination Letter** in August 2026, prompting it to propose a **1-for-10 reverse share split** and implement a compliance plan to address regulatory concerns; and its **series of international awards and industry recognitions** in September 2026, reinforcing its position as a leader in **agricultural technology and controlled environment agriculture (CEA)**. No other substantive details about Agroz’s operations or financials were highlighted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Agroz Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
47
Psychology
94
Fundamentals
64
Technical
35
Valuation
43
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-32%
Market Narrative
83
Fundamental Reality
47
Narrative Gap
+36
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** (73) reflects a market behavior where investors cling to positions despite prolonged declines (-20.2% in 3 months) and subdued trading activity (0.08x average volume). Overconfidence (52) and Euphoria (24) appear paradoxical given the stock’s deep discount (-36.2% vs. 200-day average) and weak momentum, suggesting selective optimism about valuation. The narrative gap (12) hints at a disconnect between investor expectations (59) and market reality (47), possibly fueling contradictory behaviors like holding despite losses. The key question is whether the low volume and subdued volatility signal hesitation or exhaustion in loss-averse positioning.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:06 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Company has initiated a coordinated compliance plan to address the matters identified in the Letter. The Company is finalizing the submission of the necessary corporate-action"
"Agroz Inc. ... announced a series of prestigious international awards and industry recognitions received over the past few months, further strengthening its position as a leading global AgriTech innovator."
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AGRZ reflects a clash between cyclical optimism and fundamental caution. At the top end, Nelson’s cycle analysis and Marks’ market-cycle approach both see it as undervalued relative to its position in the broader market, with Nelson even calling it ‘closer to oversold than overbought.’ Meanwhile, Graham’s Enterprising Investor framework and Mackay’s crowd psychology lens also find merit, suggesting a statistical bargain or lack of speculative frenzy. However, the middle tier—including Schwager’s disciplined risk/reward assessment—still leans positive, while Veblen and Marks (broader) introduce caution, questioning whether growth will translate into sustainable profits or if expectations are already inflated. On the other end, the consensus shifts sharply negative: Graham’s defensive criteria, Efficient Market proponents, and volatility-focused thinkers like Housel and Livermore dismiss it outright, with Livermore’s trend-following rule and Smith’s stability demands outright rejecting it. The contrast underscores how cyclical momentum and statistical discounts can coexist with deep skepticism over fundamentals, liquidity, and long-term viability.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 79
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 75
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 55
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 35
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 30
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 22
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 18
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 1
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 242 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
36.3%
Operating Margin
16.2%
Net Margin
8.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
25.6%
ROA
6.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.04
Cash
$87.37K
Total Debt
$8.90K
Current Ratio
1.29
Debt/Equity
1.18
Not enough data to compute signals.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$0.24
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$0.18
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-24.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $207.65K | $190.50K |
| 2 | 8.1% | $224.52K | $188.97K |
| 3 | 6.3% | $238.55K | $184.21K |
| 4 | 4.4% | $248.99K | $176.39K |
| 5 | 2.5% | $255.21K | $165.87K |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$188.77K
Terminal Value
$4.02M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.62M
Enterprise Value
$3.52M
Net Debt
$-78.47K
Equity Value
$3.60M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 11 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 9.9.2026
Associated Press · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
PR Newswire · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
PR Newswire · 21.8.2026
Agroz Inc. (AGRZ) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AGRZ currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AGRZ's estimated fair value is $0.18, which is 24.3% below the current price of $0.24. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AGRZ's technical score is 35/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 25.6% — strong; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; P/E: 7.2.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $0.18 vs. price $0.24 (-24.3%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 18.8% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AGRZ.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 2 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chaudhry Muhammad Arshad | Other Transaction | 3.12.2025 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $100,000.00 |
| Chaudhry Muhammad Arshad | Other Transaction | 3.12.2025 | 60,000 | -40,000 | $100,000.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
270,107 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 632,907 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
33.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology