Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$0.99
▼ $0.02 (-2.0%)
Market data updated: 10/01 01:01 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$0.98 - $1.02
52-Week Range
$0.92 - $3.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$0.92
Resistance
$1.50
WETH is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-20.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $10.11 vs. price $0.99 (+921.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $0.99
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 0 to 36 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
42
Value
72
Momentum
13
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
66
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of WeTouch Technology Inc., a global provider of touch display solutions, has focused on its financial performance and strategic initiatives. The company reported a 9.4% year-over-year revenue increase in H1 2026, with full-year guidance projecting ~40% revenue growth (~$65M) and ~60% net income growth. Additionally, it announced a special $500K cash dividend (though payment timelines require further coordination) and a strategic partnership with Canop Robotics to expand into robotics-related touch applications. Investor attention also highlights its long-term value creation and market expansion priorities.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Wetouch Technology Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
66
Technical
13
Valuation
72
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-18%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for WETH reflects deep methodological disagreements about valuation, risk, and market psychology. Benjamin Graham’s frameworks—both defensive and enterprising—unanimously flag it as a standout opportunity, emphasizing its statistical undervaluation and liquidity resilience, while Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cyclical analysis also leans bullish, suggesting it’s near a bottom. In contrast, more skeptical voices like Jesse Livermore and Edgar Lawrence Smith dismiss it outright, with Livermore’s trend-following rule and Smith’s long-term stability criteria both rejecting it. Meanwhile, Fisher, Marks, and Lynch strike a cautious middle ground, acknowledging growth potential but questioning whether the price already reflects it or if the business justifies the risk. The efficient-market camp and Loeb’s risk-averse lens further complicate the picture, with the former doubting active selection value and the latter flagging unacceptable downside. This tension highlights whether WETH’s perceived strengths (discount, liquidity, cyclical positioning) outweigh its structural risks or market inefficiencies—or if it’s simply too ambiguous for some investors to justify.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 63
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 51
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 23
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
31.8%
Operating Margin
22.1%
Net Margin
15.9%
EBITDA Margin
22.1%
ROE
5.2%
ROA
5.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.60
Cash
$118.36M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
38.88
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $0.040 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$0.99
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$10.11
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+921.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
6.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0% | $7.49M | $6.87M |
| 2 | 5.1% | $7.87M | $6.63M |
| 3 | 4.2% | $8.21M | $6.34M |
| 4 | 3.4% | $8.49M | $6.01M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $8.70M | $5.65M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$7.07M
Terminal Value
$137.15M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$89.14M
Enterprise Value
$120.65M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$120.65M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$11.52
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.52
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 11 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 30.9.2026
Benzinga · 30.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 5.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.7.2026
Benzinga · 28.7.2026
MT Newswires · 14.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.7.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 16.6.2026
Wetouch Technology Inc. (WETH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WETH currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WETH's estimated fair value is $10.11, which is 921.4% above the current price of $0.99. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WETH's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $10.11 vs. price $0.99 (+921.4%); Free cash flow growth: 786.7%; Current ratio: 38.88.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 9.1% of price; Calmar: -0.42 (3y annualized return -35.0% / max drawdown 83.8%).
Yes — WETH has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 3 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 6 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cai Guangde | Open Market Purchase | 28.2.2022 | 7,493 | +7,493 | $3.51 |
| Cai Guangde | Open Market Purchase | 28.2.2022 | 224,787 | +224,787 | $3.51 |
| Cai Guangde | Open Market Purchase | 17.11.2021 | 4,196 | +4,196 | $3.50 |
| Cai Guangde | Open Market Sale | 17.11.2021 | 1,727,268 | -1,727,268 | — |
| Cai Guangde | Open Market Sale | 17.11.2021 | 2,799,088 | -2,799,088 | — |
| Qihong Technology (Samoa) Ltd | Open Market Sale | 17.11.2021 | 2,799,088 | -2,799,088 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
25,546 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 28,218 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
26.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 27.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology