Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$232.79
▼ $1.71 (-0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/17 06:09 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$164.33B
Day Range
$231.58 - $236.30
52-Week Range
$163.75 - $255.20
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
WELL is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+41.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 35.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $45.34 vs. price $232.79 (-80.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
55
Value
33
Momentum
39
Risk
64
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
57
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING WELL...
Recent media coverage of Welltower has primarily focused on its stock performance and investor interest amid the aging baby boomer demographic. Analysts highlight Welltower’s strong year-to-date returns (26.33%) and positive momentum, though it’s noted as "fully valued" at a 4% premium to fair value. The company is frequently mentioned alongside other senior living-focused REITs as a beneficiary of rising demand due to the baby boomer generation turning 80, with limited new construction in senior housing. Some sources also briefly reference its inclusion in "buy zone" discussions among stocks to watch.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Welltower. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
34
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
57
Technical
39
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
74
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+34
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant **overconfidence** bias, amplified by euphoric valuation (423% above DCF) and momentum decoupling from fundamentals. The extreme narrative gap (77 vs. 40) implies investors are overestimating growth potential, while anchoring near support (4.7%) may limit near-term pullbacks. FOMO and euphoria act as secondary drivers, but the lack of panic or herding suggests confidence remains unshaken. The key question: *Will fundamentals justify this valuation gap, or will overconfidence lead to a correction?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:46 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The leading edge of 70 million baby boomers just started turning 80, and new senior housing construction sits at record lows."
"Welltower has eased slightly in the very short term, with the 90-day share price return of 14.13% and year-to-date share price return of 26.33%."
"Three REITs are positioned to capture that collision [of aging boomers and housing demand]."
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for WELL reflects deep methodological divides between value, growth, and cyclical investors. Edgar Lawrence Smith’s near-perfect score and 'buy-and-hold' verdict aligns with his long-term, quality-focused approach, while Benjamin Graham’s near-zero scores—even for his more lenient *Enterprising Investor*—highlight how far WELL strays from his strict margin-of-safety criteria. Meanwhile, Fisher, Housel, and Nelson see strong fundamentals or cyclical tailwinds, but Walter Bagehot’s lack of balance-sheet data and Marks’ late-cycle caution underscore how speculative or crowded the stock appears to others. The middle ground—where Lynch, Schwager, and even Marks (non-cycle) see mixed signals—suggests WELL may be a growth story with inflated expectations, appealing to some but not to those prioritizing defensive or contrarian principles.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 78
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 78
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 77
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 67
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 54
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 47
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 41
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 37
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$224.97
Range Bottom
$255.20
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
40.1%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
8.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
2.3%
ROA
1.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.41
Cash
$5.03B
Total Debt
$19.20B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.46
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 12.8.2026 | $0.850 |
| 13.5.2026 | $0.740 |
| 12.5.2026 | $0.740 |
| 25.2.2026 | $0.740 |
| 24.2.2026 | $0.740 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.740 |
| 9.11.2025 | $0.740 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.740 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.740 |
| 14.5.2025 | $0.670 |
| 13.5.2025 | $0.670 |
| 25.2.2025 | $0.670 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$232.79
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$45.34
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-80.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
23.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.1% | $2.25B | $2.07B |
| 2 | 17.9% | $2.66B | $2.24B |
| 3 | 12.8% | $3.00B | $2.32B |
| 4 | 7.6% | $3.23B | $2.29B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $3.31B | $2.15B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.83B
Terminal Value
$52.18B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$33.91B
Enterprise Value
$44.97B
Net Debt
$14.16B
Equity Value
$30.81B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$62.00
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$60.15
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Barchart · 7.9.2026
Welltower (WELL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WELL currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WELL's estimated fair value is $45.34, which is 80.5% below the current price of $232.79. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WELL's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 35.6%; Free cash flow growth: 30.9%; Calmar: 3.11 (3y annualized return 40.4% / max drawdown 13.0%).
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $45.34 vs. price $232.79 (-80.5%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -11.5%; Net income growth: -1.1%.
Yes — WELL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 8 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gundlach Andrew | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $242.06 |
| Gundlach Andrew | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $242.06 |
| Gundlach Andrew | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 27,500 | +2,500 | $242.06 |
| Gundlach Andrew | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 30,000 | +2,500 | $242.06 |
| Gundlach Andrew | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $239.47 |
| Gundlach Andrew | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $239.47 |
| Gundlach Andrew | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 25,000 | +2,500 | $239.47 |
| Gundlach Andrew | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 22,500 | +2,500 | $239.47 |
| LOPEZ DENNIS G | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 18,598 | +73 | $237.40 |
| LOPEZ DENNIS G | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 73 | +73 | $237.40 |
| Mitra Shankh | Gift | 26.6.2026 | 3,852 | -3,852 | — |
| Mitra Shankh | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.5.2026 | 17 | +17 | $173.32 |
| Mitra Shankh | Gift | 27.5.2026 | 162 | -162 | — |
| Mitra Shankh | Gift | 27.5.2026 | 76,477 | -162 | — |
| LOPEZ DENNIS G | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 63 | +63 | $216.01 |
| LOPEZ DENNIS G | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 18,525 | +63 | $216.01 |
| BACON KENNETH J | Conversion of Derivative Security | 1.5.2026 | 2,627 | +2,627 | — |
| BACON KENNETH J | Conversion of Derivative Security | 1.5.2026 | 2,627 | -2,627 | — |
| BACON KENNETH J | Conversion of Derivative Security | 1.5.2026 | 14,306 | +2,627 | — |
| BACON KENNETH J | Conversion of Derivative Security | 1.5.2026 | 3,591 | -2,627 | — |
| BACON KENNETH J | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 1,056 | +1,056 | — |
| BACON KENNETH J | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 1,056 | +1,056 | — |
| SULLIVAN KATHRYN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 1,056 | +1,056 | — |
| Spisso Johnese | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 1,056 | +1,056 | — |
| DeSalvo Karen B | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 1,056 | +1,056 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
18,431,638 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 17,696,568 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology