Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$192.65
▼ $1.22 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/21 07:25 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$42.38B
Day Range
$191.65 - $196.00
52-Week Range
$110.36 - $249.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$127.11
Resistance
$227.49
WDAY is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-17.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 32.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.6% of price
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
59
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
52
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING WDAY...
Recent media coverage of Workday, Inc. highlights its strong Q2 financial performance, driven by a 13% subscription growth and accelerating AI adoption, which has fueled a 49.7% stock rally over three months. Analysts focus on whether AI-driven growth can sustain momentum toward fiscal 2028, amid mixed valuation concerns and competitive pressures. The company’s higher-margin outlook and cash flow strength remain key discussion points.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Workday, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
29
Fundamentals
52
Technical
59
Valuation
45
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+66%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme sentiment (100/100) and detached valuation (+33.2% above 200-day avg) suggest **Euphoria** dominates, despite weak momentum (-5.6% ROC). This disconnect—where price ignores fundamentals and DCF—implies investors may be ignoring downside risks. The narrative gap (6-point divergence) hints at overoptimism, as reality lags perception. The key question: *Will sentiment sustain despite valuation and momentum misalignment?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:46 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Workday's Q2 beat, accelerating AI adoption and a higher-margin outlook shift attention to whether AI can drive fiscal 2028 growth."
"Workday reported fiscal second-quarter revenue of $2.65 billion, up nearly 13% year over year and above expectations."
"Workday pairs 13% subscription growth... with a mixed valuation and ongoing competition and execution risks."
"Workday's 49.7% three-month rally is backed by stronger Q2 results, AI contract growth and margin gains."
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 62/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for WDAY reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score and favorable cycle position contrast sharply with Benjamin Graham’s near-total rejection, as Graham’s defensive criteria prioritize deep undervaluation and margin of safety—qualities WDAY lacks—while Nelson’s cyclical approach sees it as oversold and ripe for a rebound. Meanwhile, Fisher, Smith, and Veblen cluster around mid-range scores, suggesting the stock has *some* merit but falls short of their standards for long-term quality or sustainable growth. The crowd-driven excitement flagged by Mackay and the lack of clear trend for Livermore highlight a stock that may appeal to momentum traders but lacks the structural advantages sought by value investors like Graham or the contrarian edge preferred by Loeb. Even the efficient-market camp sees little edge, reinforcing that WDAY’s appeal is niche rather than broad.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 61
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 60
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 57
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 53
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 51
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 50
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 36
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 29
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 16
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
7.5%
Net Margin
7.3%
EBITDA Margin
7.5%
ROE
8.9%
ROA
3.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.61
Cash
$1.50B
Total Debt
$2.99B
Current Ratio
1.32
Debt/Equity
0.38
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$192.65
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$211.50
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+9.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
15.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.4% | $3.20B | $2.94B |
| 2 | 12.2% | $3.60B | $3.03B |
| 3 | 9.0% | $3.92B | $3.02B |
| 4 | 5.7% | $4.14B | $2.93B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $4.25B | $2.76B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$2.78B
Terminal Value
$66.94B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$43.51B
Enterprise Value
$58.19B
Net Debt
$1.49B
Equity Value
$56.71B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$29.11
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.61
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
CNBC · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Barrons.com · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Workday, Inc. (WDAY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WDAY currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WDAY's estimated fair value is $211.50, which is 9.8% above the current price of $192.65. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WDAY's technical score is 59/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 32.8%; Free cash flow growth: 26.7%; Net income growth: 31.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.6% of price; Calmar: -0.11 (3y annualized return -7.3% / max drawdown 63.4%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for WDAY.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 18 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 23,875 | -23,875 | $193.57 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Conversion of Derivative Security | 15.9.2026 | 96,545 | +96,545 | — |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 3,868 | -3,868 | $194.39 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Conversion of Derivative Security | 15.9.2026 | 96,545 | -96,545 | — |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 25,163 | -25,163 | $190.71 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 26,152 | -26,152 | $192.73 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 17,487 | -17,487 | $191.63 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 27,883 | -27,883 | $184.33 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Conversion of Derivative Security | 10.9.2026 | 100,780 | +100,780 | — |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 22,388 | -22,388 | $187.05 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 23,551 | -23,551 | $184.98 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Conversion of Derivative Security | 10.9.2026 | 100,780 | -100,780 | — |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 2,493 | -2,493 | $187.75 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 24,465 | -24,465 | $186.26 |
| Rowe Zane | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.9.2026 | 2,808 | -2,808 | $195.79 |
| Kazmaier Gerrit S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.9.2026 | 3,369 | -3,369 | $195.79 |
| Enslin Robert | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.9.2026 | 2,228 | -2,228 | $195.79 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 600 | -600 | $204.05 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 6,241 | -6,241 | $196.73 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 600 | -600 | $201.75 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 7,631 | -7,631 | $199.91 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 13,666 | -13,666 | $195.81 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 31,605 | -31,605 | $198.11 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 30,048 | -30,048 | $198.87 |
| DUFFIELD DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 224 | -224 | $200.59 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
17,041,430 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 25,349,192 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology