Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Materials · ·
$244.30
▼ $4.90 (-2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:39 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$31.70B
Day Range
$242.50 - $250.72
52-Week Range
$242.50 - $331.09
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
VMC is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
-16.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 40.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $104.72 vs. price $244.30 (-57.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (70/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
10
Risk
48
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
68
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING VMC...
Recent media coverage of Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) highlights its strong long-term stock performance, with a 14.13% annualized return over 15 years and a 58.4% gain over five years. Analysts debate whether the stock is overvalued, citing valuation metrics like discounted cash flow and market multiples. Additionally, DA Davidson initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and a $330 price target, while an insider sold shares worth over $3.8 million. Earnings reports and dividend activity also drew attention.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Vulcan Materials Company. News trend score: 80. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
85
Fundamentals
68
Technical
10
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-19%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+16
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme anchoring (91) reflects a near-term focus on VMC’s tight support proximity, overriding other biases. Overconfidence (45) and euphoria (35) persist despite valuation and momentum contradictions, hinting at a disconnect between price and fundamentals. The narrative gap (30) widens reality vs. expectations, raising the question of whether traders remain anchored to outdated price anchors or if fundamentals will eventually force a re-evaluation. The key tension lies between the market’s stubbornness near support and the potential for a reality check from valuation or earnings.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:02 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$100 invested in Vulcan Materials 15 years ago would be worth significantly more today, outperforming the market by 1.02% annually (14.13% average return)"
"Vulcan Materials trades at a premium to fair value based on cash flows and market multiples, with intrinsic value estimates suggesting overvaluation"
"DA Davidson initiates coverage of Vulcan Materials with a Buy rating and a price target of $330"
"Vulcan (VMC) reported earnings 30 days ago; analysts now examine future estimates for potential stock movement"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides the historical methodologies sharply, with some models seeing strong potential while others flag significant red flags. The highest-scoring approaches—Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle analysis (93) and Walter Bagehot’s liquidity focus (86)—suggest the stock is either oversold or resilient enough to weather financial stress, implying a tactical or defensive opportunity. Meanwhile, long-term buy-and-hold advocates like Edgar Lawrence Smith (72) and Morgan Housel (68) view it as a quiet, compounding play, though even they acknowledge it’s not a standout. On the other end, the most bearish signals—Jesse Livermore’s outright negative trend (17) and Benjamin Graham’s defensive failure (26)—warn against it entirely, while efficient-market skeptics like Bogle (47) and Lynch (45) dismiss it as overpriced or unexceptional. The divergence stems from whether the methodology prioritizes short-term positioning (Nelson, Bagehot), patient accumulation (Smith, Housel), or strict valuation/trend discipline (Graham, Livermore).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 86
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 69
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 64
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 63
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 61
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 48
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 26
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
27.4%
Operating Margin
20.4%
Net Margin
13.6%
EBITDA Margin
29.8%
ROE
12.6%
ROA
6.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$8.16
Cash
$183.30M
Total Debt
$4.36B
Current Ratio
2.69
Debt/Equity
0.51
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 13.8.2026 | $0.520 |
| 22.5.2026 | $0.520 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.520 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.520 |
| 8.3.2026 | $0.520 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.490 |
| 9.11.2025 | $0.490 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.490 |
| 13.8.2025 | $0.490 |
| 23.5.2025 | $0.490 |
| 22.5.2025 | $0.490 |
| 10.3.2025 | $0.490 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$244.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$104.72
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-57.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9% | $1.17B | $1.07B |
| 2 | 2.8% | $1.20B | $1.01B |
| 3 | 2.7% | $1.23B | $952.77M |
| 4 | 2.6% | $1.27B | $896.87M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.30B | $843.38M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.14B
Terminal Value
$20.46B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$13.30B
Enterprise Value
$18.08B
Net Debt
$4.18B
Equity Value
$13.90B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$64.24
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$24.53
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 3 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Barchart · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
The Fly · 9.9.2026
The Fly · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VMC currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, VMC's estimated fair value is $104.72, which is 57.1% below the current price of $244.30. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
VMC's technical score is 10/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 40.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 2.69.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $104.72 vs. price $244.30 (-57.1%); Calmar: 0.19 (3y annualized return 4.9% / max drawdown 26.1%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — VMC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hill J Thomas | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 66,513 | -5,696 | $275.49 |
| Hill J Thomas | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 62,209 | -542 | $277.09 |
| Hill J Thomas | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 62,751 | -3,762 | $276.51 |
| Hill J Thomas | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 58,209 | -4,000 | $276.70 |
| Hill J Thomas | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 3,762 | -3,762 | $276.51 |
| Hill J Thomas | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 542 | -542 | $277.09 |
| Hill J Thomas | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 4,000 | -4,000 | $276.70 |
| Hill J Thomas | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 5,696 | -5,696 | $275.49 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 22,400 | -22,400 | — |
| Hill J Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.8.2026 | 17,176 | -17,176 | $287.79 |
| Hill J Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.8.2026 | 17,962 | -17,962 | $287.79 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 21,670 | -21,670 | — |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 27,000 | -27,000 | — |
| Hill J Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.8.2026 | 17,287 | -17,287 | $287.79 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 26,100 | -26,100 | — |
| Hill J Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.8.2026 | 18,882 | -18,882 | $287.79 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 24,800 | +24,800 | $164.38 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 27,000 | +27,000 | $133.95 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 24,800 | -24,800 | — |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 22,400 | +22,400 | $185.31 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 26,100 | +26,100 | $113.16 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 21,670 | +21,670 | $180.52 |
| Hill J Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.8.2026 | 18,969 | -18,969 | $287.79 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 91,415 | +24,800 | $164.38 |
| Hill J Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 66,615 | +26,100 | $113.16 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,615,575 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,124,440 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology