Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$237.50
▼ $1.08 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/16 01:25 PM
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$237.02 - $238.42
52-Week Range
$210.01 - $247.45
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+10.1% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 2/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 0.7% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
VIG’s overall investor score of 61 reflects a mixed technical and risk profile tempered by strong news sentiment. The technical category (score: 46) shows conflicting signals: while the stock maintains positive positioning above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages—a bullish structural trend—momentum indicators like the negative MACD histogram and RSI of 47.9 suggest weakening upward momentum. The risk category (score: 58) highlights a relatively stable but modest volatility profile, with a low ATR (0.7% of price) and a Calmar ratio of 0.93, indicating consistent returns despite a notable 15.4% historical drawdown. However, the ROC (-1.2%) and CMF (-0.18) further underscore near-term caution. The news category (score: 100) stands out as a neutral-to-positive outlier, with recent coverage emphasizing VIG’s role in dividend-focused portfolios and comparisons to peers like SCHD, reinforcing its relevance for income-oriented investors.
The stock sits above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling long-term strength, but momentum indicators (MACD, RSI) and the negative ROC/CMF suggest short-term weakness and potential downtrend pressure.
This duality—structural support vs. fading momentum—creates uncertainty for traders weighing entry/exit points.
Recent media coverage is overwhelmingly neutral to positive, with VIG frequently highlighted as a dividend-focused ETF for retirees and passive investors, though some comparisons to higher-yielding peers exist.
Positive news sentiment mitigates technical concerns by reinforcing VIG’s role in income strategies, but it doesn’t address underlying price action.
Volatility is low (ATR 0.7%), but the Calmar ratio (0.93) reveals a trade-off between steady returns (14.3% annualized) and a significant historical drawdown (15.4%).
While volatility is manageable, the drawdown risk suggests investors should brace for potential pullbacks despite the stock’s stability.
StockIQ conclusion
VIG’s moderate investor score of 61 reflects a stock with structural long-term support but near-term technical headwinds. The absence of volatility (low ATR) and steady dividend focus are strengths, while fading momentum indicators and historical drawdown risk introduce caution. News sentiment remains positive, reinforcing its role in income portfolios, but technical data suggests investors should monitor for momentum recovery before committing to new positions.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
58
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG)** has primarily focused on comparisons with rival dividend-focused ETFs like Schwab’s **SCHD** and **Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity**, emphasizing differences in yield, expense ratios, and portfolio composition. VIG is noted for its emphasis on companies with long dividend growth histories (often 10+ years) and a tech-heavy exposure, while SCHD offers higher yields but leans toward value stocks. Articles also highlight cost efficiency and how overlapping ETF holdings can inflate fees for retirees seeking passive income. No new major developments beyond these thematic comparisons are reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF. News trend score: 74. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
11
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
82
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixating on the 2.2% gap below resistance, likely using it as a mental reference point for valuation. The narrative gap (60 vs. 50) hints at a disconnect where optimism (e.g., sentiment) slightly exceeds objective conditions. While euphoria is present at 20%, it’s muted by weak momentum and neutral RSI, indicating cautious optimism rather than blind exuberance. The key question: will traders break free from the resistance anchor, or will the stock consolidate near this level?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:36 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""VIG Pays Less Than Half of SCHD by Design""
""paying multiple expense ratios for a nearly identical stack of stocks""
""SCHD ETF has officially become the biggest dividend ETF after overtaking VIG""
""Schwab offers double Vanguard's yield but leans value; Vanguard emphasizes tech and 10-year dividend growth""
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 40/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for VIG reflects deep contrasts between methodologies prioritizing patience and fundamentals versus those wary of crowd behavior or market timing. Morgan Housel’s near-perfect score highlights his preference for steady, long-term compounders—here, the stock’s stability aligns with his patient-holder philosophy. Meanwhile, Samuel Nelson’s moderate approval and Gerald Loeb’s cautious nod suggest a favorable technical or defensive posture, but neither is as bullish as Housel. At the opposite end, Jack Schwager’s low score and Livermore’s negative trend reading reveal a consensus among trend-followers and disciplined traders that the stock lacks a clear momentum or contrarian edge. Even Graham’s and Fisher’s neutral stances—stemming from insufficient data—underscore how this stock’s appeal hinges on subjective interpretations of growth and valuation, leaving hard-core value investors hesitant. The tension between Marks’ mixed but guarded view and the efficient-market skeptics’ lukewarm stance further underscores whether VIG is a niche opportunity or a speculative bet.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 74
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 274 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$235.36
Range Bottom
$247.45
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 26.6.2026 | $0.999 |
| 27.3.2026 | $0.833 |
| 22.12.2025 | $0.884 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.865 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.871 |
| 27.3.2025 | $0.938 |
| 23.12.2024 | $0.876 |
| 27.9.2024 | $0.835 |
| 28.6.2024 | $0.899 |
| 22.3.2024 | $0.769 |
| 21.12.2023 | $0.916 |
| 28.9.2023 | $0.771 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 8 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Kiplinger · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for VIG specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
VIG's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 0.7% of price; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -0.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — VIG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
260,792 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 214,379 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology