Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$121.26
▼ $0.22 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/18 02:53 PM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$121.04 - $122.02
52-Week Range
$83.09 - $126.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+34.7% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.7% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
VGT’s overall investor score of 80 reflects a balanced profile driven by strong technical momentum and favorable news sentiment, though tempered by notable risk factors. The technical category (77) highlights robust bullish signals, including sustained price strength above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive MACD histogram and RSI indicating healthy upward momentum. However, the overbought %K (87.2) suggests potential short-term exhaustion, while the declining volume despite price gains raises caution about underlying demand. The news category (100) is uniformly positive, with themes like AI-driven growth, chip concentration, and memory shortages reinforcing VGT’s exposure to high-growth sectors. Yet, the risk category (58) is a significant drag, with a low ATR (1.8%) and a Calmar ratio of 1.07—highlighting volatility relative to returns and a historically steep drawdown (27.4%) against a 29.5% annualized return. The interplay of these factors creates a nuanced picture: VGT’s technical and thematic strengths are compelling, but its volatility and potential overvaluation warrant close monitoring.
Price remains firmly above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and RSI (56.8) signaling upward momentum, though %K (87.2) indicates overbought conditions. Volume trends are declining despite price gains, suggesting weakening participation.
Technical strength validates near-term bullishness, but declining volume and overbought conditions could signal a potential pullback or consolidation.
All news items are either positive or neutral, emphasizing VGT’s strong AI and semiconductor exposure, with themes like memory shortages and AI-driven growth reinforcing its strategic positioning. No negative news is present.
The absence of negative sentiment and dominance of growth-oriented headlines support VGT’s long-term thematic appeal, particularly in AI and tech.
The ATR (1.8%) is exceptionally low, indicating limited volatility, while the Calmar ratio (1.07) reflects a high return-to-drawdown ratio (29.5% return vs. 27.4% max drawdown), suggesting volatility is concentrated in sharp pullbacks rather than steady movement.
The low ATR may appear favorable, but the steep drawdown history and Calmar ratio imply that while returns are strong, they come with significant risk of sharp corrections.
StockIQ conclusion
VGT presents a compelling case with strong technical momentum and a positive news environment, particularly in AI and semiconductor sectors. However, the risk profile is notable, with historically steep drawdowns and declining volume raising caution. The low ATR suggests limited volatility, but this may not fully capture the potential for sharp corrections. Investors should monitor volume trends and news sentiment closely, as these could shift the balance between VGT’s strengths and risks.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
74
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
70
Risk
58
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)** has centered on its strong long-term performance, with articles highlighting its 27% year-to-date gain and potential as a long-term buy. Investor sentiment remains mixed, however, as a $700 million withdrawal preceded a Snowflake earnings report, sparking debate about AI-driven disruption in tech. Additionally, discussions on cybersecurity’s AI-driven growth and comparisons with concentrated tech ETFs like XLK have emerged. The fund’s broad exposure (310 stocks) contrasts with narrower, high-performing alternatives.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Vanguard Information Technology ETF. News trend score: 92. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
—
Technical
70
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for VGT suggests traders are anchored near a critical resistance level (1.7% away), indicating a reluctance to deviate from this reference point. Mild euphoria (score 31) and FOMO (score 23) coexist but are overshadowed by anchoring, implying a focus on near-term price thresholds rather than broader momentum. The narrative gap (17) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and measured reality, yet anchoring dominates due to its proximity to resistance. The key question remains whether traders will break or hold near this level, given the absence of panic or overconfidence signals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:23 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""This exchange-traded fund has been a boffo performer for many years.""
""VGT’s $58 Billion AI Chip Concentration Could Derail Your 2027 Returns""
""The Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF should continue to outpace the S&P 500.""
""Investors yanked $700 million from the top software ETF in a single session""
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 76/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for VGT reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors approach stock selection. Morgan Housel’s high score and positive verdict highlight his preference for patient, long-term compounders with steady growth—here, the model suggests VGT aligns with his ‘quiet compounder’ philosophy. In contrast, cycle-sensitive investors like Samuel Nelson and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) flag late-stage risks, scoring poorly due to perceived overbought conditions or stretched valuations. Meanwhile, fundamentalists like Benjamin Graham and Philip Fisher are stymied by insufficient data, while technical or contrarian voices like Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager dismiss it outright for lack of clear trends or setups. The efficient-market camp further undermines the stock’s appeal by questioning its edge over broad indices, underscoring a tension between active-picking strategies and passive principles.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 76
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 52
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 27
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 17
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 17
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.6.2026 | $0.138 |
| 24.3.2026 | $0.093 |
| 17.12.2025 | $0.095 |
| 24.9.2025 | $0.107 |
| 26.6.2025 | $0.088 |
| 25.3.2025 | $0.091 |
| 18.12.2024 | $0.097 |
| 27.9.2024 | $0.115 |
| 28.6.2024 | $0.095 |
| 22.3.2024 | $0.157 |
| 19.12.2023 | $0.099 |
| 28.9.2023 | $0.110 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Motley Fool · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Motley Fool · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
etf.com · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Moby · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for VGT specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
VGT's technical score is 70/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.7% of price; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; %K 86.1 — overbought; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — VGT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,652,943 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,102,872 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology