Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$49.67
▲ $4.22 (+9.3%)
Market data updated: 09/26 11:37 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$3.04B
Day Range
$45.89 - $49.84
52-Week Range
$26.00 - $86.63
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$39.77
Resistance
$56.04
VECO is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+68.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/33 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $12.40 vs. price $49.67 (-75.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
37
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
78
Risk
46
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
55
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Veeco Instruments Inc. has centered on its strong financial performance and growth prospects, particularly driven by demand in AI-related semiconductor packaging. The company reported better-than-expected Q2 2026 earnings, raised its 2026 outlook, and secured new orders in AI packaging. Additionally, there was notable insider selling activity, while analysts highlighted its potential for high returns, around 21%, for investors. Stock volatility and investor interest were also reflected in market activity.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Veeco Instruments Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
45
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
61
Fundamentals
55
Technical
78
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-30%
Market Narrative
84
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+42
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant Loss Aversion (49) reflects a market behavior consistent with a prolonged drawdown (-23.6% over three months) and heightened trading activity (1.06x volume). Meanwhile, Overconfidence (45) and Euphoria (35) suggest investors remain detached from the stock’s extreme valuation (+260% above DCF) and weak momentum. The narrative gap (+28) further implies selective attention to positive narratives despite deteriorating fundamentals. The key question is whether the recent negative momentum will trigger a shift from overvaluation denial to risk mitigation.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:43 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI-driven demand, strong orders and customer engagement fuel growth"
"Veeco Instruments tops Q2 earnings and revenue estimates"
"Veeco Instruments (VECO) Is Up 5.6% After Raising 2026 Outlook"
"growth despite margin pressure"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for VECO reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, valuation, and market psychology. Bagehot and Nelson’s high scores (85 and 82) suggest a defensive or cyclical strength—Bagehot’s focus on liquidity and Nelson’s bullish cycle positioning—while Marks (cycle) and Housel’s moderate scores (66 and 61) imply cautious optimism, balancing early-cycle potential with manageable risk. In contrast, Fisher, Lynch, and Graham’s low scores (36–30) stem from strict growth/valuation thresholds and defensive criteria, dismissing VECO as lacking the fundamentals or margin of safety they demand. Meanwhile, Livermore and Veblen’s near-failure (29 and 21) align with their skepticism toward speculative trends or detached growth, while the efficient-market camp’s 46 score critiques the stock’s lack of clear alpha potential. The debate hinges on whether VECO’s cyclical or liquidity tailwinds justify its valuation—or if it’s a speculative bet doomed by overvaluation or trend resistance.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 85
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 61
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 40
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 9
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
40.0%
Operating Margin
5.4%
Net Margin
5.3%
EBITDA Margin
8.4%
ROE
4.0%
ROA
2.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.60
Cash
$163.47M
Total Debt
$226.01M
Current Ratio
4.75
Debt/Equity
0.26
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$49.67
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$12.40
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-75.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1% | $53.89M | $49.44M |
| 2 | 1.5% | $54.69M | $46.03M |
| 3 | 1.8% | $55.68M | $42.99M |
| 4 | 2.2% | $56.88M | $40.30M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $58.30M | $37.89M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$53.29M
Terminal Value
$919.38M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$597.53M
Enterprise Value
$814.19M
Net Debt
$62.54M
Equity Value
$751.65M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$14.61
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.97
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
Trefis · 17.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 8.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Veeco Instruments Inc. (VECO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VECO currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, VECO's estimated fair value is $12.40, which is 75.0% below the current price of $49.67. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
VECO's technical score is 78/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.26; Current ratio: 4.75.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $12.40 vs. price $49.67 (-75.0%); ATR: 5.2% of price; Calmar: 0.36 (3y annualized return 23.2% / max drawdown 64.2%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for VECO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 23 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miller William John | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 169,570 | -70,697 | $54.49 |
| Miller William John | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 240,267 | -123,334 | $54.07 |
| Miller William John | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 363,601 | -5,969 | $52.85 |
| Miller William John | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 70,697 | -70,697 | $54.49 |
| Miller William John | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,969 | -5,969 | $52.85 |
| Miller William John | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 123,334 | -123,334 | $54.07 |
| RAYMOND MARY JANE | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 25,967 | -3,000 | — |
| RAYMOND MARY JANE | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 83,546 | -20,256 | $50.42 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 73,310 | -10,236 | $51.29 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 68,802 | -1,608 | $54.28 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 70,410 | -800 | $53.44 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 71,210 | -2,100 | $52.50 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 800 | -800 | $53.44 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 2,100 | -2,100 | $52.50 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 20,256 | -20,256 | $50.42 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 10,236 | -10,236 | $51.29 |
| KIERNAN JOHN P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 1,608 | -1,608 | $54.28 |
| Wilkerson Susan | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 15,505.6 | -15,505.6 | $69.56 |
| Wilkerson Susan | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 27,468 | -15,506 | $69.56 |
| HUNTER GORDON | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 16,974 | -16,974 | $68.80 |
| Devasahayam Adrian | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $65.00 |
| HUNTER GORDON | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 11,236 | -16,974 | $68.80 |
| Devasahayam Adrian | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 85,115 | -10,000 | $65.00 |
| HUNTER GORDON | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 6,752 | -6,752 | $63.78 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,775,038 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,729,026 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology