Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$369.93
▼ $1.00 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/18 04:32 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$173.60B
Day Range
$368.39 - $372.48
52-Week Range
$293.89 - $385.57
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
V is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+7.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.6% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
14d ago · $378.75
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 0 to 36 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
57
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
59
Risk
58
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
70
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING V...
Recent media coverage of Visa Inc. has centered on its stock performance, declining by 1.6% in a single session amid broader market trends, alongside concerns over competition from India’s UPI payment system, which surpassed 71.7 billion transactions quarterly—nearly matching Visa’s global volume. Additionally, Visa is expanding into blockchain-based solutions, leveraging onchain lending and credit for stablecoin card programs, with annualized settlement volumes exceeding $20 billion. The company also participated in a Goldman Sachs conference, highlighting strategic initiatives in fintech and digital payments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Visa Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
70
Technical
59
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are synchronizing moves based on peer performance rather than independent analysis. The narrative gap (62 vs. 35) implies optimism may outpace tangible fundamentals, while euphoria’s moderate momentum and overvaluation hint at speculative positioning. Key uncertainty lies in whether the stock’s underperformance relative to peers will persist or if traders will re-engage. Overconfidence in price momentum over fundamentals could amplify mispricing if fundamentals weaken. Anchoring near resistance may act as a psychological barrier to further declines.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:32 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Visa is expanding its network of stablecoin-linked cards as demand for cryptocurrencies grows"
"India wants to export a payment system whose current volume rivals Visa's entire global processing count"
"Visa is pairing payment settlement data with blockchain lending tools to help fintechs access working capital"
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 75/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that Morgan Housel and Charles Mackay give relatively high scores (69 and 66), reflecting their emphasis on patient compounding and emerging crowd excitement, which leads to positive verdicts. Investors who stress valuation margins and defensive safety, such as Benjamin Graham and Jack Schwager, assign low scores (32 and 20) and issue negative judgments, indicating the stock falls short of their strict criteria. Mid‑range scores from Howard Marks, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch and the efficient‑market view (scores in the 40s‑50s) produce mixed conclusions, as their frameworks weigh solid business quality against already‑priced growth and cyclical considerations. The overall spread from 69 down to 20 illustrates how differing methodological priorities—long‑term compounder focus, margin‑of‑safety discipline, or trend‑following bias—drive divergent assessments of V.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 75
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 68
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 46
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 37
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 34
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 32
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 28
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 17
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
60.0%
Net Margin
50.1%
EBITDA Margin
63.0%
ROE
52.9%
ROA
20.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$17.16B
Total Debt
$25.17B
Current Ratio
1.08
Debt/Equity
0.66
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.8.2026 | $0.670 |
| 12.5.2026 | $0.670 |
| 11.5.2026 | $0.670 |
| 10.2.2026 | $0.670 |
| 9.2.2026 | $0.670 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.670 |
| 11.11.2025 | $0.670 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.590 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.590 |
| 13.5.2025 | $0.590 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.590 |
| 11.2.2025 | $0.590 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Visa Inc. (V) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
V currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
V's technical score is 59/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.6% of price; Return on equity (ROE): 52.9% — strong; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — V has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROTTENBERG JULIE B | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 1,867 | -1,867 | $368.34 |
| ROTTENBERG JULIE B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 1,867 | +1,867 | $134.76 |
| ROTTENBERG JULIE B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 1,867 | -1,867 | — |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 5,875 | +5,875 | $134.76 |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 5,875 | -5,875 | — |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 5,875 | -5,875 | $379.65 |
| ROTTENBERG JULIE B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 2,028 | -2,028 | — |
| ROTTENBERG JULIE B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 2,028 | +2,028 | $109.82 |
| ROTTENBERG JULIE B | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 2,028 | -2,028 | $381.35 |
| Taneja Rajat | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 17,927 | -17,927 | $371.00 |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 5,875 | -5,875 | — |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 5,875 | +5,875 | $134.76 |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 5,875 | -5,875 | $367.87 |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 64,624 | -5,875 | — |
| Taneja Rajat | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 232,112 | -17,927 | $371.00 |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 21,049 | +5,875 | $134.76 |
| MCINERNEY RYAN | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 15,174 | -5,875 | $367.87 |
| Suh Chris | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 15,289 | -15,289 | — |
| Suh Chris | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 6,992 | -6,992 | $364.15 |
| Suh Chris | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 15,289 | +15,289 | — |
| ANDRESKI PETER M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 5,492 | +5,492 | — |
| ANDRESKI PETER M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 4,170 | -4,170 | — |
| ANDRESKI PETER M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 1,714 | -1,714 | $364.15 |
| ANDRESKI PETER M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 4,170 | +4,170 | — |
| MAHON TULLIER KELLY | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.7.2026 | 37,281 | -37,281 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
20,321,652 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 20,789,298 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology