Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$60.06
▼ $0.19 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:38 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$93.58B
Day Range
$59.65 - $60.33
52-Week Range
$45.02 - $66.08
Beta
—
Next Earnings
15.10.2026
Support
$58.81
Resistance
$66.08
USB is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+19.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 21.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
36
Risk
56
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
60
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING USB...
Recent media coverage of U.S. Bancorp highlights its strong stock performance, particularly its 91.5% gain over three years, which some analysts suggest may still leave its shares **40% undervalued** based on business banking expansion. The company has also expanded into key Sun Belt states (Florida, Georgia, Texas, and Arizona) to bolster its mid-sized business banking presence. Additionally, there’s focus on its **consistent dividend payouts**, though comparisons with Truist reveal differing growth trajectories. A few mentions of institutional trading activity and a financial advisor transition (Zachary Karason moving to Prudential Advisors) were noted, but the primary narrative centers on valuation and strategic growth initiatives.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about U.S. Bancorp. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 8 vs. 8 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
60
Technical
36
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **herding** state (55) reflects relative underperformance versus peers, suggesting traders are aligning with broader financials (AFL, ALL, AXP) rather than acting on isolated signals. Mild **FOMO** (11) and **euphoria** (13) stem from positive momentum and sentiment, but the narrative gap (55 vs. 40) hints at overestimating bullish narratives. **Anchoring** (19) may keep traders near support, while low **panic selling** (2) and **overconfidence** (2) indicate no extreme distress. The key question: *Will the stock’s underperformance persist, or will traders reengage if momentum shifts?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:54 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"only one bank is quietly building momentum while the other sits frozen in place"
"U.S. Bancorp stock has outperformed the Dow Jones Index’s returns over the past year"
"U.S. Bancorp (USB) Stock May Be 40% Undervalued On Business Banking Expansion"
"U.S. Bancorp expands business banking into Florida, Georgia, Texas, and Arizona"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 43/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for USB reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors weigh risk, growth, and market timing. Defensive value investors like **Benjamin Graham** and **Gerald M. Loeb** see it as a reasonable hold—Graham even calls it attractive for cautious buyers, while Loeb notes its capital-preservation merits—but **Enterprising Graham** dismisses it as too expensive for aggressive risk-takers. Meanwhile, **Peter Lynch** and **Edgar Lawrence Smith**, both growth-focused, are bullish, arguing the stock’s price hasn’t yet reflected its potential, though **Fisher** and **Livermore** remain skeptical, with Fisher calling it merely solid and Livermore avoiding it entirely due to unclear trends. The contrast between **Morgan Housel’s** patient compounder endorsement (score 84) and **Jack Schwager’s** outright rejection (score 31) underscores whether the stock’s stability or speculative hype matters more—Housel’s long-term lens contrasts sharply with Schwager’s disciplined avoidance of weak setups. Even **Howard Marks**, who sees mixed potential, warns of overinflated expectations, while **Charles Mackay** and **Thorstein Veblen** detect crowd-driven excitement, hinting at speculative rather than fundamental appeal.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 95
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 84
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 78
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 75
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 62
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 62
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
26.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
11.6%
ROA
1.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.62
Cash
$46.89B
Total Debt
$17.16B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.26
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.520 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.520 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.520 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.520 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.520 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.520 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.520 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.520 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.500 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$41.84
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$30.59
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 4 neutral, 8 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Business Wire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
U.S. Bancorp (USB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
USB currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
USB's technical score is 36/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 21.9%; Net income growth: 20.2%; Debt/equity: 0.26.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — USB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kedia Gunjan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 453,529 | +27,267 | $55.01 |
| Kedia Gunjan | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 426,262 | -27,267 | $62.37 |
| Kedia Gunjan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 0 | -27,267 | — |
| Kedia Gunjan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 27,267 | +27,267 | $55.01 |
| Kedia Gunjan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 27,267 | -27,267 | — |
| Kedia Gunjan | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 27,267 | -27,267 | $62.37 |
| CHOSY JAMES L | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 22,968 | -22,968 | $63.28 |
| CHOSY JAMES L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 24,711 | +24,711 | $55.01 |
| CHOSY JAMES L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 24,711 | -24,711 | — |
| CHOSY JAMES L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 275,652 | +24,711 | $55.01 |
| CHOSY JAMES L | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 252,684 | -22,968 | $63.28 |
| CHOSY JAMES L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 0 | -24,711 | — |
| CHOSY JAMES L | Gift | 21.7.2026 | 3,969 | -3,969 | — |
| CHOSY JAMES L | Gift | 21.7.2026 | 250,941 | -3,969 | — |
| Philipson Stephen L | Open Market Sale | 20.7.2026 | 36,906 | -36,906 | $63.08 |
| Philipson Stephen L | Open Market Sale | 20.7.2026 | 74,969 | -36,906 | $63.08 |
| Dilip Venkatachari | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 34,522 | -34,522 | $55.52 |
| Dilip Venkatachari | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 51,292 | -34,522 | $55.52 |
| BAXTER WARNER L | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.4.2026 | 3,355 | +3,355 | — |
| Reynolds Loretta E | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.4.2026 | 3,355 | +3,355 | — |
| Mehdi Yusuf I | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.4.2026 | 3,355 | +3,355 | — |
| WIEHOFF JOHN | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.4.2026 | 3,355 | +3,355 | — |
| Bridges Dorothy J | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.4.2026 | 3,355 | +3,355 | — |
| Gillani Aleem | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.4.2026 | 3,355 | +3,355 | — |
| Colberg Alan B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.4.2026 | 3,355 | +3,355 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
25,080,410 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 26,708,424 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology