Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$266.64
▲ $8.50 (+3.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$243.51B
Day Range
$259.83 - $268.26
52-Week Range
$152.73 - $334.03
Beta
—
Next Earnings
19.10.2026
Support
$248.13
Resistance
$312.93
TXN is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+46.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 73.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $27.29 vs. price $266.64 (-89.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (67/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
65
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $266.64
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 11 to 36 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
67
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
70
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
79
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING TXN...
Recent media coverage of Texas Instruments (TXN) has primarily focused on its stock performance amid broader market trends, particularly its modest gains during market dips. While headlines highlight broader semiconductor sector optimism—driven by AI demand and surging sales—TXN’s stock is noted for lagging despite strong financial returns, such as shareholder cash distributions. The company’s resilience in a competitive market is implied but not detailed in the limited sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Texas Instruments. News trend score: 100. Reason: 18 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
79
Technical
70
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-17%
Market Narrative
83
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+47
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Overconfidence** (score 45) reflects a disconnect between the stock’s extreme valuation (+849% DCF premium) and its stagnant price momentum (-3.1% ROC) versus EPS growth. This suggests traders are overestimating intrinsic value despite observable underperformance, possibly due to narrative-driven optimism. The **narrative gap** (37-point divergence) further supports this, as extreme positive sentiment (100/100) persists despite neutral technical signals (RSI 40, Bollinger %B 0.28). The key question is whether this confidence will hold as traders reconcile the valuation premium with lackluster execution. **Loss Aversion** (39) and **Anchoring** (27) act as secondary brakes, hinting at cautious holding rather than aggressive selling or buying.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:15 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"surging semiconductor sales and solid AI demand fuel optimism for chip stocks"
"The chipmaker sent shareholders a fortune in cash, yet the stock went nowhere fast."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 84/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for TXN reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, valuation, and market positioning. At the top, Bagehot and Nelson see it as a resilient, cyclically favorable play—Bagehot’s liquidity focus and Nelson’s oversold assessment suggest they’d prioritize survival and timing. Meanwhile, Fisher and Schwager, both disciplined but distinct, agree on a solid setup (67 each), though Fisher’s higher bar for exceptional quality contrasts with Schwager’s structured reward/risk framework. On the opposite end, Graham (both Defensive and Enterprising) and Livermore dismiss it outright—Graham’s strict margin-of-safety criteria and Livermore’s trend-following rule clash with the stock’s perceived valuation and momentum. Marks’ split verdict (39 vs. 67) highlights his tension between valuation caution and cycle optimism, while Veblen’s low score flags speculative tendencies. The middle ground (Mackay, Smith, Housel) hints at moderate concern, with Mackay’s crowd psychology warning and Housel’s pragmatic ‘holdable-but-not-effortless’ stance bridging cautious and opportunistic perspectives.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 84
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 67
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 63
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 61
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 50
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 49
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 38
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 25
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 21
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
57.0%
Operating Margin
34.1%
Net Margin
28.3%
EBITDA Margin
34.1%
ROE
30.7%
ROA
14.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.47
Cash
$3.23B
Total Debt
$14.05B
Current Ratio
4.35
Debt/Equity
0.86
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.7.2026 | $1.420 |
| 30.7.2026 | $1.420 |
| 5.5.2026 | $1.420 |
| 4.5.2026 | $1.420 |
| 30.1.2026 | $1.420 |
| 29.1.2026 | $1.420 |
| 31.10.2025 | $1.420 |
| 30.10.2025 | $1.420 |
| 31.7.2025 | $1.360 |
| 30.7.2025 | $1.360 |
| 30.4.2025 | $1.360 |
| 29.4.2025 | $1.360 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$266.64
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$27.29
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-89.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-3.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -3.4% | $2.51B | $2.31B |
| 2 | -1.9% | $2.47B | $2.08B |
| 3 | -0.4% | $2.46B | $1.90B |
| 4 | 1.0% | $2.48B | $1.76B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $2.54B | $1.65B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$2.60B
Terminal Value
$40.09B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$26.05B
Enterprise Value
$35.74B
Net Debt
$10.82B
Equity Value
$24.92B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$17.82
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.08
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 18 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Texas Instruments (TXN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 65/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TXN currently scores 65/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, TXN's estimated fair value is $27.29, which is 89.8% below the current price of $266.64. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
TXN's technical score is 70/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 73.8%; Return on equity (ROE): 30.7% — strong; Current ratio: 4.35.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $27.29 vs. price $266.64 (-89.8%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — TXN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abraham Tsedeniya | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 1,365 | -1,365 | — |
| Abraham Tsedeniya | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 1,365 | +1,365 | $79.26 |
| Abraham Tsedeniya | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 592 | -592 | $264.96 |
| Abraham Tsedeniya | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 6,408 | -6,408 | $264.60 |
| Abraham Tsedeniya | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 30,181 | +1,365 | $79.26 |
| Abraham Tsedeniya | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 23,773 | -6,408 | $264.60 |
| Abraham Tsedeniya | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 23,181 | -592 | $264.96 |
| Abraham Tsedeniya | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 0 | -1,365 | — |
| Knecht Julie C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 7,154 | +7,154 | — |
| Knecht Julie C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 16,294 | +7,154 | — |
| FARMER CURTIS C | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 85.18 | +85.18 | $322.86 |
| PATSLEY PAMELA H | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 85.18 | +85.18 | $322.86 |
| PATSLEY PAMELA H | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 65,170 | +85 | $322.86 |
| FARMER CURTIS C | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 2,144 | +85 | $322.86 |
| Craighead Martin S | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 357 | -357 | $321.01 |
| Craighead Martin S | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 9,643 | -9,643 | $320.41 |
| Craighead Martin S | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 14,716 | -9,643 | $320.41 |
| Craighead Martin S | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 14,359 | -357 | $321.01 |
| Lizardi Rafael R | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 32,119 | -32,119 | $307.85 |
| Lizardi Rafael R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 47,734 | +47,734 | $174.81 |
| BAHAI AHMAD | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $110.15 |
| Lizardi Rafael R | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 14,156 | -14,156 | $308.54 |
| Lizardi Rafael R | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 1,459 | -1,459 | $309.45 |
| Lizardi Rafael R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 47,734 | -47,734 | — |
| BAHAI AHMAD | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $309.13 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
21,414,170 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 16,771,217 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
44.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 37.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology