Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$3.95
▼ $0.02 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 10/01 12:39 AM
Fundamentals updated: 10/01/2026
News analyzed: 10/01/2026
Market Cap
$630.82M
Day Range
$3.88 - $4.05
52-Week Range
$2.86 - $10.59
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$3.91
Resistance
$7.11
TROX is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-3.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.03
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -8.7% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
31
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
47
Value
55
Momentum
16
Risk
46
Sentiment
20
Fundamental
26
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Tronox Holdings plc has primarily focused on its strategic expansion into rare earth and critical minerals, with multiple reports highlighting a $32 million joint investment agreement with JX Advanced Metals to advance feasibility studies for projects in Australia and the U.S., aiming for up to 10,000 tons of annual oxide output. Analysts have also weighed in with mixed views, including a downgrade to "Underperform" with a lowered price target, alongside concerns over declining stock performance, falling margins, and weak earnings amid weaker titanium dioxide (TiO2) prices.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Tronox Holdings plc Ordinary Shares (UK). News trend score: 20. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
34
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
93
Fundamentals
26
Technical
16
Valuation
55
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-38%
Market Narrative
21
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
-15
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
TROX’s psychology is dominated by anchoring (90), as the stock trades perilously close to support (0.5% above), suggesting traders fixate on this level as a psychological barrier. Loss aversion (76) is also strong, reflecting deep recent losses (-33.3% in 3 months) and subdued volume, which may signal reluctance to sell further. The narrative gap (-11) hints at a disconnect between market sentiment (25) and objective reality (36), possibly reinforcing caution. The key question: *Will traders hold near support, or will the 0.5% buffer erode under pressure?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:54 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Tronox (TROX) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
"Tronox Holdings is rated Sell amid high leverage, falling margins, and weak earnings."
"Tronox Holdings Plc (TROX) Pressured by Softer Guidance and Leverage Risks."
"JPMorgan Downgrades Tronox Holdings (TROX) to Underweight From Neutral, Adjusts Price Target to $5 From $7."
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for TROX reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Value-oriented thinkers like Benjamin Graham (both Enterprising and Defensive) and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) overwhelmingly see opportunity here—Graham’s frameworks highlight deep statistical discounts, while Marks’ cycle analysis suggests the stock sits in a favorable early-to-mid phase. Meanwhile, Jack Schwager and Samuel Armstrong Nelson also lean positive, emphasizing disciplined setups and oversold conditions, respectively. In contrast, Peter Lynch, Philip Fisher, and Thorstein Veblen dismiss it outright, with Fisher rejecting the lack of quality/growth traits and Veblen flagging speculative growth motives. The middle ground—Gerald Loeb, Walter Bagehot, and Morgan Housel—acknowledges moderate merits but flags risks like liquidity concerns or effortless holding. Even Jesse Livermore and the Efficient Market Hypothesis reject it, with Livermore’s trend-following rule and the EMH’s skepticism toward stock-picking efficacy clashing with the value/cycle optimists.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 99
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 9
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
9.3%
Operating Margin
-8.7%
Net Margin
-16.2%
EBITDA Margin
1.7%
ROE
-33.1%
ROA
-7.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.97
Cash
$199.00M
Total Debt
$39.00M
Current Ratio
2.46
Debt/Equity
0.03
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.8.2026 | $0.050 |
| 11.5.2026 | $0.050 |
| 10.5.2026 | $0.050 |
| 23.2.2026 | $0.050 |
| 22.2.2026 | $0.050 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.050 |
| 9.11.2025 | $0.050 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.050 |
| 10.8.2025 | $0.050 |
| 19.5.2025 | $0.125 |
| 18.5.2025 | $0.125 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.125 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$8.95
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.60
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 9 neutral, 8 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 30.9.2026
Benzinga · 30.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Benzinga · 29.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 18.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 17.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Fintel · 14.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 13.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 12.8.2026
Tronox Holdings plc Ordinary Shares (UK) (TROX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 31/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TROX currently scores 31/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
TROX's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.03; Current ratio: 2.46; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -8.7% (negative); Net margin: -16.2% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
Yes — TROX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schwarz Keith | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 18,262 | +18,262 | — |
| Schwarz Keith | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 18,262 | +18,262 | — |
| JONES GINGER M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 3,335 | -3,335 | $9.79 |
| Khan Moazzam A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 15,690 | +15,690 | — |
| Johnston Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 15,690 | +15,690 | — |
| Nkosi Sipho Abednego | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 15,690 | +15,690 | — |
| Turgeon Jean Francois | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 14,538 | -14,538 | $9.79 |
| Khan Moazzam A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 16,166 | -16,166 | $9.79 |
| Johnston Peter | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 2,742 | -2,742 | $9.79 |
| KAUFTHAL ILAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 15,690 | +15,690 | — |
| Jones Stephen J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 2,881 | -2,881 | $9.79 |
| KAUFTHAL ILAN | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 4,032 | -4,032 | $9.79 |
| JONES GINGER M | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 15,690 | +15,690 | — |
| Jones Stephen J | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 15,690 | +15,690 | — |
| Turgeon Jean Francois | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 15,690 | +15,690 | — |
| Nkosi Sipho Abednego | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 1,705 | -1,705 | $9.79 |
| JONES GINGER M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 120,735 | -3,335 | $9.79 |
| JONES GINGER M | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 136,425 | +15,690 | — |
| KAUFTHAL ILAN | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 290,312 | -4,032 | $9.79 |
| KAUFTHAL ILAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 306,002 | +15,690 | — |
| Jones Stephen J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 92,533 | -2,881 | $9.79 |
| Jones Stephen J | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 108,223 | +15,690 | — |
| Khan Moazzam A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 48,327 | -16,166 | $9.79 |
| Khan Moazzam A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.4.2026 | 64,017 | +15,690 | — |
| Johnston Peter | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.4.2026 | 188,771 | -2,742 | $9.79 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
19,802,312 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 19,970,938 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology