Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$38.23
▲ $1.60 (+4.4%)
Market data updated: 09/21 12:52 AM
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$3.87B
Day Range
$37.31 - $38.73
52-Week Range
$19.30 - $38.73
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$28.25
Resistance
$38.73
TRMD is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+64.7% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.21 (3y annualized return 13.8% / max drawdown 65.5%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
TORM PLC (TRMD) exhibits a strong overall investor score of 83, driven primarily by robust technical and news-based fundamentals, though its risk profile introduces notable caution. The technical category scores an impressive 90, reflecting a bullish momentum with the stock price above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a recent crossover of the 50-day SMA over the 200-day SMA, and a positive MACD histogram indicating upward momentum. However, the RSI at 76.7 and %K at 93.8 signal overbought conditions, which may suggest potential short-term volatility or a need for consolidation. The news category scores 86, bolstered by positive fundamental assessments and record quarter performance, though neutral capital increase announcements dilute some optimism. Meanwhile, the risk category scores a low 42, heavily influenced by a high volatility measure (65.5% maximum drawdown over three years) and a relatively modest ATR (2.7% of price), indicating significant historical price swings and potential instability. The combination of strong technical momentum and positive news contrasts sharply with elevated risk metrics, creating a nuanced outlook where growth potential is tempered by volatility concerns.
The stock demonstrates strong bullish momentum with the price above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a recent SMA 50 crossover above SMA 200, and a positive MACD histogram. However, the RSI (76.7) and %K (93.8) indicate overbought conditions, signaling potential short-term overvaluation.
Technical strength suggests upward price momentum, but overbought indicators may signal impending pullback or consolidation.
The news category reflects strong fundamentals with positive analyst ratings and record quarter performance, though neutral announcements regarding capital increases dilute some positive sentiment.
Positive news reinforces long-term confidence, but neutral developments may introduce uncertainty about future capital allocation.
The risk profile is weak, with a high volatility measure (65.5% maximum drawdown over three years) and a relatively low ATR (2.7% of price), indicating significant historical price volatility and potential instability.
High volatility and drawdown risk suggest the stock may experience sharp price swings, impacting investor confidence.
StockIQ conclusion
TORM PLC (TRMD) presents a compelling case with strong technical momentum and positive news sentiment, supported by a high investor score and outperformance relative to its index. However, elevated risk metrics—including high historical volatility and overbought conditions—introduce caution, particularly for short-term investors. The stock’s strength lies in its fundamentals and recent performance, but the potential for sharp price swings and geopolitical risks must be carefully monitored. Long-term investors may find value in its growth potential, while short-term traders should proceed with heightened awareness of volatility.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
70
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
10d ago · $35.46
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 57)
What happened after
12d ago · $35.18
Evidence: 2 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
12d ago · $35.18
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
12d ago · $35.18
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
13d ago · $35.18
Evidence: 2 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
13d ago · $35.18
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
13d ago · $35.18
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
14d ago · $35.18
Evidence: 2 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
14d ago · $35.18
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
14d ago · $35.18
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
15d ago · $35.18
Evidence: 2 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
15d ago · $35.18
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $35.18
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
16d ago · $34.18
Evidence: 2 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
16d ago · $34.18
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
19d ago · $33.21
Evidence: 2 insider open-market buy(s) in the last 30 days
What happened after
19d ago · $33.21
Evidence: 1.7x recent average volume
What happened after
19d ago · $33.21
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 1, 2026
Then
80
$32.81
Now
70
$38.23
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
81
Risk
42
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
25
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of TORM plc highlights its strong financial performance and strategic initiatives. The company reported record quarterly earnings of $512 million in Q2 2026, driven by soaring product tanker rates and a booming market, though geopolitical risks were noted as a potential fragility. Analysts, like Evercore ISI, maintained an "Outperform" rating with a slightly raised price target. Additionally, TORM conducted a capital increase tied to its incentive program, issuing new shares. The company’s financial health and value potential were also praised, though broader industry trends and rate volatility remain key discussion points.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about TORM plc. News trend score: 56. Reason: 3 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
66
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
74
Fundamentals
—
Technical
81
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+30%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for TRMD suggests a dominant anchoring bias, likely due to proximity (1.8%) to resistance, while FOMO and euphoria coexist as secondary forces. The narrative-reality gap (18 points) hints at overoptimism, but the anchoring score (63) implies traders may hesitate to push past resistance. Key open question: Will traders break the psychological barrier at 1.8% below resistance, or will anchoring sustain near-term consolidation? The shared momentum/sentiment signals between FOMO and panic suggest caution is balanced by speculative enthusiasm.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:59 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Record TCE earnings of USD512 million and more than doubles profits year-over-year""
""Record Quarter Rides A Fragile Geopolitical Wave""
""Evercore ISI Group maintains Outperform on TORM, raises price target to $38""
""TORM plc capital increase in connection with exercise of Restricted Share Units""
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 74/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological clashes between momentum-driven and fundamental approaches. Jesse Livermore’s high score and bullish trend verdict contrast sharply with the near-universal ‘not enough data’ flags from value-oriented investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith, Benjamin Graham, and Philip Fisher, who rely on deep financial metrics. Meanwhile, behavioral economists like Charles Mackay and Thorstein Veblen flag speculative patterns, while cycle-focused analysts like Howard Marks (Market Cycle) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson warn of overvaluation—suggesting a stock that may appeal to trend-followers but lacks the structural fundamentals or risk-adjusted appeal for traditional value or contrarian investors.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 74
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 34
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 19
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 0
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 9.9.2026 | $2.400 |
| 27.5.2026 | $0.700 |
| 26.5.2026 | $0.700 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.700 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.700 |
| 19.11.2025 | $0.620 |
| 18.11.2025 | $0.620 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.400 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.400 |
| 21.5.2025 | $0.400 |
| 20.5.2025 | $0.400 |
| 19.3.2025 | $0.600 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 15 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.9.2026
PR Newswire · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
PR Newswire · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
PR Newswire · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
PR Newswire · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Business Wire · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
PR Newswire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
PR Newswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for TORM plc (TRMD) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TRMD specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TRMD's technical score is 81/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.21 (3y annualized return 13.8% / max drawdown 65.5%); RSI 76.9 — approaching overbought territory; %K 92.2 — overbought.
Yes — TRMD has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 20 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balle Kim | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.9.2026 | 42,533 | +42,533 | — |
| Balle Kim | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.9.2026 | 42,533 | +42,533 | $27.61 |
| Balle Kim | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 254 | +254 | — |
| Balle Kim | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 254 | +254 | — |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.5.2026 | 85,067 | +85,067 | — |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 170,133 | -170,133 | $32.30 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.5.2026 | 85,066 | +85,066 | $22.47 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.5.2026 | 85,066 | +85,066 | — |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.5.2026 | 85,067 | +85,067 | $20.51 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.5.2026 | 85,067 | +85,067 | $20.51 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.5.2026 | 170,133 | +85,066 | $22.47 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 0 | -170,133 | $32.30 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.5.2026 | 1,180,533 | +85,067 | — |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.5.2026 | 1,095,467 | +85,066 | — |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 348,411 | -348,411 | $31.94 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 30,603 | -30,603 | $31.94 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 348,411 | -30,603 | $31.94 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 0 | -348,411 | $31.94 |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.4.2026 | 225,200 | +225,200 | — |
| Meldgaard Jacob Balslev | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.4.2026 | 1,265,600 | +225,200 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,503,123 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 981,779 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology