Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$349.05
▲ $0.48 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/17 01:40 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$24.08B
Day Range
$348.55 - $353.96
52-Week Range
$269.23 - $547.20
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
TPL is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+11.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.4% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
13
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
74
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING TPL...
Recent media coverage of Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) highlights its strong financial performance and investor appeal, particularly in energy and dividend-focused sectors. Headlines emphasize its record Q2 2026 revenue, net income, and free cash flow, positioning it as a top buy amid rising oil prices and market outperformance. Analysts note moderate optimism, while comparisons to other energy stocks (e.g., Liberty Energy, Murphy Oil) underscore its growth potential. Long-term investor interest is also noted, with TPL outperforming the S&P 500 and delivering robust returns over a decade.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Texas Pacific Land Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
23
Fundamentals
74
Technical
13
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **paradoxical euphoria** (score: 19) driven by extreme positive news sentiment (100/100) despite weak technicals—price momentum (-2.9% ROC) and underperformance vs. fundamentals. This disconnect between narrative (optimism) and reality (lagging price action) widens the narrative gap (21 points), indicating traders may be overweighing recent headlines. Herding (score: 7) is present but muted, as today’s outperformance (+5.4%) is modest relative to peers. The absence of panic or overconfidence signals suggests traders are cautiously optimistic rather than reckless. The key question: *Will the euphoria-driven narrative sustain despite lagging fundamentals?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:26 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Texas Pacific Land (NYSE:TPL) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 54.67% on an annualized basis"
"Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week August 30 — Dividend activity recap for Champions, Contenders & Challengers"
"Texas Pacific Land has outperformed the broader market over the past year, and analysts are moderately optimistic about the stock’s prospects"
"Texas Pacific Land Corporation delivered record Q2 2026 revenue, net income, and free cash flow"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The top scores from Bagehot, Nelson, Smith, Mackay, Fisher and Veblen all reflect criteria centered on financial resilience, favorable cycle positioning and intrinsic quality, so the model estimates they view TPL positively. In contrast, Howard Marks (both cycle and overall) and Schwager sit near the middle, indicating mixed views where business strength is recognized but valuation or timing concerns moderate their enthusiasm. The more valuation‑focused frameworks of Graham (defensive and enterprising), Lynch, and the efficient‑market duo assign low scores because the stock does not appear cheap enough or meet growth‑at‑reasonable‑price thresholds. Finally, Livermore’s trend rule and Housel’s volatility tolerance produce the lowest assessments, highlighting that under their documented principles the stock’s price momentum and volatility are seen as detracting factors.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 80
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 75
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 68
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 30
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 27
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
74.2%
Net Margin
60.3%
EBITDA Margin
82.0%
ROE
33.0%
ROA
29.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.98
Cash
$144.81M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
4.40
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.9.2026 | $0.600 |
| 1.6.2026 | $0.600 |
| 31.5.2026 | $0.600 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.600 |
| 1.3.2026 | $0.600 |
| 1.12.2025 | $0.533 |
| 30.11.2025 | $0.533 |
| 2.9.2025 | $0.533 |
| 1.9.2025 | $0.533 |
| 2.6.2025 | $0.533 |
| 1.6.2025 | $0.533 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.533 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$21.14
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$20.66
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TPL currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
TPL's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 33.0% — strong; Current ratio: 4.40.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.4% of price; Calmar: 0.38 (3y annualized return 19.9% / max drawdown 52.6%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — TPL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 25 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 10.9.2026 | 1 | +1 | $366.18 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 9.9.2026 | 1 | +1 | $378.57 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 1 | +1 | $375.10 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 4.9.2026 | 1 | +1 | $360.03 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 3.9.2026 | 1 | +1 | $367.61 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 2.9.2026 | 1 | +1 | $363.20 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 1.9.2026 | 1 | +1 | $369.10 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $369.47 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 3,244,020 | +1 | $364.42 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $364.42 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 3,244,019 | +1 | $365.74 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $365.74 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 3,244,018 | +1 | $375.00 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $375.00 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 3,244,017 | +1 | $372.58 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $372.58 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 3,244,016 | +1 | $377.39 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $377.39 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 3,244,015 | +1 | $381.51 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $381.51 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $377.85 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $372.10 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $361.16 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 17.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $357.32 |
| HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2026 | 1 | +1 | $357.56 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,635,324 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,302,685 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
73.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology