Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$6.88
▼ $0.16 (-2.3%)
Market data updated: 09/30 11:38 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$240.42M
Day Range
$6.87 - $7.08
52-Week Range
$6.25 - $10.53
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$6.42
Resistance
$9.24
TG is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-14.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $7.64 vs. price $6.88 (+11.0%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.25 (3y annualized return 8.7% / max drawdown 35.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
42
Risk
54
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
63
Institutional
9
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Tredegar Corporation highlights its financial performance and leadership changes. The company reported a strong second-quarter 2026, with adjusted earnings per share rising 260% year-over-year to $0.18 and sales increasing to $209.76 million, driven by gains in aluminum extrusions. Additionally, Tredegar announced the retirement of its CFO, Frasier W. Brickhouse II, and the election of Ana Dutra to its board of directors, signaling organizational shifts amid growth.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Tredegar Corporation. News trend score: 62. Reason: 3 of the last 16 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
8
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
34
Fundamentals
63
Technical
42
Valuation
67
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning with today’s relative outperformance (+1.3% vs. peers) rather than fundamental or momentum signals. Low FOMO/Euphoria scores (3/4) indicate no urgency or euphoria, while muted volume (0.66x avg) and neutral RSI (48) rule out panic. The key question is whether this herding persists if peers underperform tomorrow—momentum is fragile here. Overconfidence (score 1) hints at cautious optimism despite price lagging EPS growth, but no clear narrative gap (reality > narrative) to fuel extreme bias.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:09 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Tredegar reported quarterly earnings of $0.18 per share, a 260% increase over $0.05 per share from the same period last year (Benzinga)"
"Tredegar announced the retirement of CFO Frasier W. Brickhouse II, effective September 1, 2026 (Yahoo)"
"Tredegar announced the election of Ana Dutra to its Board of Directors (Business Wire)"
"Tredegar provided an update on its One Tredegar Transformation (Business Wire)"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 37/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and contrarian methodologies. Fisher, Lynch, and Smith—all known for seeking long-term, high-growth opportunities—unanimously rate it as a top-tier candidate, praising its potential for sustained compounding and undervaluation relative to its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, Graham’s Defensive and Enterprising frameworks, along with Schwager’s disciplined setup, also see value, though with slightly more caution, highlighting statistical discounts and favorable risk-reward ratios. In contrast, the more cyclical or trend-following approaches—like Marks’ market cycle analysis and Livermore’s trend-following rules—are far more reserved, with Livermore outright rejecting it due to its perceived downtrend. Even the efficient-market skeptics (Malkiel/Bogle) and Loeb’s risk-averse lens downgrade it, suggesting the stock’s appeal is either overstated or lacks a clear edge over passive strategies. The divergence underscores whether this is a *growth story* (backed by Lynch, Fisher, and Smith) or a *contrarian bet* (supported by Graham and Schwager) versus a *cyclical or speculative play* (flagged by Livermore and Veblen).
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 94
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 83
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 82
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 78
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 77
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 76
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 71
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 64
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 53
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 37
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (4 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
15.5%
ROA
9.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.96
Cash
$6.73M
Total Debt
$35.05M
Current Ratio
1.62
Debt/Equity
0.16
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2023 | $0.130 |
| 14.6.2023 | $0.130 |
| 23.3.2023 | $0.130 |
| 22.3.2023 | $0.130 |
| 15.12.2022 | $0.130 |
| 14.12.2022 | $0.130 |
| 15.9.2022 | $0.130 |
| 14.9.2022 | $0.130 |
| 16.6.2022 | $0.120 |
| 15.6.2022 | $0.120 |
| 24.3.2022 | $0.120 |
| 23.3.2022 | $0.120 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$6.88
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$7.64
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+11.0%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $17.31M | $15.88M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $18.72M | $15.75M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $19.89M | $15.36M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $20.76M | $14.70M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $21.27M | $13.83M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$15.74M
Terminal Value
$335.48M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$218.04M
Enterprise Value
$293.56M
Net Debt
$28.32M
Equity Value
$265.24M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$6.23
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$5.43
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 12 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 16 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Business Wire · 4.9.2026
Business Wire · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
Associated Press · 7.8.2026
Business Wire · 7.8.2026
Yahoo · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Business Wire · 3.8.2026
Business Wire · 30.7.2026
Yahoo · 30.7.2026
Benzinga · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
Zacks · 23.6.2026
Zacks · 22.6.2026
Business Wire · 1.6.2026
Tredegar Corporation (TG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TG currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, TG's estimated fair value is $7.64, which is 11.0% above the current price of $6.88. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
TG's technical score is 42/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $7.64 vs. price $6.88 (+11.0%); SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 151.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.25 (3y annualized return 8.7% / max drawdown 35.1%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — TG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 21 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweeney Susan E | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.9.2026 | 8,343 | +8,343 | — |
| Yao Cindy | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.9.2026 | 19,510 | +19,510 | $7.01 |
| Gottwald James T. | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 14 | -14 | $8.00 |
| GOTTWALD WILLIAM M | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 14 | -14 | $8.00 |
| GOTTWALD JOHN D | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 13 | -13 | $8.00 |
| GOTTWALD WILLIAM M | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 361,126 | -14 | $8.00 |
| Gottwald James T. | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 361,126 | -14 | $8.00 |
| GOTTWALD JOHN D | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 361,127 | -13 | $8.00 |
| GOTTWALD JOHN D | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 361,140 | -781 | $8.00 |
| Gottwald James T. | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 361,140 | -780 | $8.00 |
| Gottwald James T. | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 780 | -780 | $8.00 |
| GOTTWALD JOHN D | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 781 | -781 | $8.00 |
| Gottwald James T. | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 361,920 | -4,318 | $8.12 |
| GOTTWALD JOHN D | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 361,921 | -4,318 | $8.12 |
| GOTTWALD WILLIAM M | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 361,920 | -4,318 | $8.12 |
| GOTTWALD JOHN D | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 4,318 | -4,318 | $8.12 |
| GOTTWALD WILLIAM M | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 4,318 | -4,318 | $8.12 |
| Gottwald James T. | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 4,318 | -4,318 | $8.12 |
| Gottwald James T. | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 366,238 | -3,472 | $8.01 |
| DasGupta Arijit | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 140,097 | +2,093 | $7.87 |
| GOTTWALD JOHN D | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 366,239 | -3,472 | $8.01 |
| GOTTWALD WILLIAM M | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 366,238 | -3,472 | $8.01 |
| Gottwald James T. | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 3,472 | -3,472 | $8.01 |
| DasGupta Arijit | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 2,093 | +2,093 | $7.87 |
| GOTTWALD WILLIAM M | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 3,472 | -3,472 | $8.01 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
697,047 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 659,303 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology