Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$65.52
▲ $0.30 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:59 AM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$64.41 - $65.59
52-Week Range
$38.00 - $72.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$53.64
Resistance
$72.56
TECK is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+66.1% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 3/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.33 (3y annualized return 15.5% / max drawdown 47.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202657
This Week
77
7D Ago
↓ -20
Weakening
Technical
42
7D Ago: 74
↓ -32
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Risk
42
7D Ago: 42
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
18d ago · $68.12
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
21d ago · $69.34
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
21d ago · $69.34
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
22d ago · $70.54
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
22d ago · $70.54
Evidence: 11 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
57 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
78
$71.62
Now
57
$65.52
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
42
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on **Teck Resources Ltd.** (TECK) is limited, with no direct headlines or summaries explicitly mentioning the company. The provided sources focus primarily on **Freeport-McMoRan (FCX)**, **Southern Copper (SCCO)**, and **Ero Copper**, discussing copper price records, earnings beats, and stock performance tied to AI-driven demand and supply constraints. No specific details about Teck’s recent activities, financials, or market trends are available in these headlines.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Teck Resources Ltd. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
27
Fundamentals
—
Technical
42
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
TECK’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, as traders appear fixated on the near resistance level (0.8% away), despite euphoric momentum and sentiment. The narrative-reality gap (24 points) hints at overoptimism, while FOMO and euphoria coexist, fueled by strong momentum and extreme positive sentiment. The key tension lies between the anchoring barrier and the euphoric overbought conditions—will traders break resistance, or will the gap between narrative and reality widen further? The dominant state may shift if the stock fails to sustain momentum or if sentiment cools.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:20 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Each 10-cent rise in the copper price is worth approximately $390 million in annual EBITDA for Freeport-McMoRan"
"Copper hit a record on the London Metal Exchange as AI data center demand collided with tight mine supply"
"SCCO's cash flow surges 116.9% in H1'26, aided by higher sales, lower costs and rising metal prices"
"TECK vs. WPM: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option?"
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for TECK reveals a deep divide between methodologies that rely on fundamental data and those that prioritize market psychology or cyclical risk. Investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Benjamin Graham’s traditional approach are stymied by insufficient dividend or balance-sheet data, leaving their models unable to form a concrete opinion—unlike the more quantitative or behavioral frameworks. Meanwhile, the lowest-scoring strategies—from Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s overbought cycle warning to Howard Marks’ late-cycle caution—suggest a consensus that the stock’s volatility or valuation risks outweigh its growth potential, while the middle-ground thinkers like Malkiel and Bogle see only weak evidence for active selection over passive indexing. The disconnect underscores how data scarcity forces fundamentalists into indecision, while cyclical and behavioral models flag red flags without needing deep financials.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 83
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 36
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 18
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 13
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.9.2026 | $0.090 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.089 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.089 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.092 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.092 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.090 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.090 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.092 |
| 15.6.2025 | $0.092 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.087 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.087 |
| 13.12.2024 | $0.088 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Trefis · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Teck Resources Ltd (TECK) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TECK specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TECK's technical score is 42/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; CMF 20 days: 0.13.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.33 (3y annualized return 15.5% / max drawdown 47.0%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -0.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — TECK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,530,763 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 14,104,917 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
26.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology