Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$78.71
▼ $0.89 (-1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/17 05:48 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$78.37 - $80.14
52-Week Range
$68.19 - $91.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
SYY is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
-0.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.17 (3y annualized return 4.0% / max drawdown 24.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
23
Risk
42
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
50
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING SYY...
Recent media coverage of Sysco has centered on its strategic shift toward integrating artificial intelligence to drive growth, with analysts noting potential undervaluation as the company targets 6-7% sales growth in fiscal 2027 and $100 million in AI-driven cost savings. The firm paused its share buyback program while maintaining its dividend and expanded its board with AI and finance experts, signaling a renewed focus on technology and operational efficiency. Additionally, billionaire investor Daniel Loeb’s recent $48 million stake in Sysco drew attention as part of his broader non-AI investment strategy.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Sysco. News trend score: 56. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
89
Fundamentals
50
Technical
23
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s near-universal fixation on SYY’s 0.2% proximity to support suggests traders are anchoring to this technical threshold, ignoring broader weakness like negative momentum (-2.9% ROC) and peer underperformance. The narrative-reality gap (18 points) hints at overemphasis on short-term price levels, while low volatility (0.79x ATR) and muted panic (score 16) imply cautious, not frantic, positioning. The key question: will traders break free from the 0.2% anchor if support holds—or will they double down, assuming it’s a ‘buy the dip’ opportunity? The dominant bias here is a mechanical, rule-based anchoring, not emotional urgency.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 08:29 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Sysco’s share price has eased in the past month, with a 30 day share price return of down 3.8%, although the 90 day share price return of 10.0% and year to date share price return of 12.6% point to improving momentum around the AI plan""
""Sysco expanded its Board to 13 directors by adding AI- and finance-focused leaders Jason Murray and Tom Ondrof""
""Billionaire Daniel Loeb’s fund bought 580,000 shares of Sysco Corporation""
""Sysco recently suspended its share repurchase plan""
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for SYY reflects deep methodological disagreements about valuation, momentum, and risk tolerance. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-perfect score suggests a cyclical bullishness—seeing it as oversold and ripe for a rebound—while the Graham methodologies (both Defensive and Enterprising Investor) dismiss it outright, citing failure to meet core defensive metrics and statistical cheapness thresholds. Meanwhile, patient, long-term thinkers like Morgan Housel and Edgar Lawrence Smith see it as a quiet, compounding opportunity, contrasting sharply with Philip Fisher and Peter Lynch, who reject it for lacking the growth or quality they prioritize. Even cyclical analysts like Howard Marks split: his market-cycle model is lukewarm, but his broader valuation approach flags mixed signals, hinting at high expectations. The divergence underscores whether SYY’s appeal lies in technical timing (Nelson), fundamental patience (Housel/Smith), or outright risk aversion (Graham/Bagehot).
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 65
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 55
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 55
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 49
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 45
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 35
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 15
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 14
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$79.15
Range Bottom
$86.65
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
18.5%
Operating Margin
3.7%
Net Margin
2.1%
EBITDA Margin
4.8%
ROE
65.9%
ROA
6.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.67
Cash
$1.79B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.28
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.7.2026 | $0.550 |
| 1.7.2026 | $0.550 |
| 2.4.2026 | $0.540 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.540 |
| 2.1.2026 | $0.540 |
| 1.1.2026 | $0.540 |
| 3.10.2025 | $0.540 |
| 2.10.2025 | $0.540 |
| 3.7.2025 | $0.540 |
| 2.7.2025 | $0.540 |
| 4.4.2025 | $0.510 |
| 3.4.2025 | $0.510 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$5.55
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$7.31
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 11 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Investing.com · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Sysco (SYY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SYY currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SYY's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 65.9% — strong; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.17 (3y annualized return 4.0% / max drawdown 24.0%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -1.9%; Net income growth: -3.9%.
Yes — SYY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sewell Brandon Elliot | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 3,285 | +3,285 | — |
| Hourican Kevin | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 84,581 | +84,581 | — |
| Keller Gregory Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 6,041 | +6,041 | — |
| Higgs Stephen Dale | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 9,062 | +9,062 | — |
| Keller Gregory Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 11,237 | +11,237 | — |
| Higgs Stephen Dale | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 6,041 | +6,041 | — |
| Johnson Jennifer L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 6,283 | +6,283 | — |
| Schott Jennifer Kaplan | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 13,774 | +13,774 | — |
| Garrett Brenna C | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 10,270 | +10,270 | — |
| Keller Gregory Scott | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 47 | -47 | $81.08 |
| Phillips Ronald L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 13,539 | +13,539 | — |
| Phillips Ronald L | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 36,313 | -506 | $84.09 |
| Phillips Ronald L | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 506 | -506 | $84.09 |
| Hourican Kevin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 468,342 | -12,796 | $83.06 |
| Phillips Ronald L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 36,819 | -1,831 | $83.06 |
| Phillips Ronald L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 46,000 | +7,350 | $76.54 |
| Phillips Ronald L | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 38,650 | -7,350 | $83.61 |
| Phillips Ronald L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 7,350 | -7,350 | — |
| Keller Gregory Scott | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 21,504 | -1,105 | $83.06 |
| Garrett Brenna C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 8,192 | -358 | $83.06 |
| Higgs Stephen Dale | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 8,782 | -970 | $83.06 |
| Schott Jennifer Kaplan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 13,651 | -665 | $83.06 |
| Johnson Jennifer L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 16,337 | -621 | $83.06 |
| Sewell Brandon Elliot | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 4,521 | -236 | $83.06 |
| Garrett Brenna C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 358 | -358 | $83.06 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,041,900 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,125,217 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 35.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology