Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$95.36
▲ $4.24 (+4.7%)
Market data updated: 09/22 12:50 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$3.73B
Day Range
$91.09 - $96.00
52-Week Range
$58.28 - $149.11
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$88.09
Resistance
$124.75
SYNA is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+32.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
MACD
MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $26.92 vs. price $95.36 (-71.8%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
39
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
37
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
31
Risk
34
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
31
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Synaptics Incorporated has centered on its **$7 billion acquisition by ON Semiconductor**, announced in September 2026, where shareholders will receive 1.35 ON Semiconductor shares per Synaptics share. The deal, expected to close mid-2027, reflects ON Semiconductor’s push into physical AI and sensing technologies. Additionally, reports highlight insider stock sales—including CEO and CFO transactions—largely tied to tax obligations from equity vesting, rather than strategic divestment. Investor interest remains strong amid Synaptics’ growth in IoT and AI-driven markets.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Synaptics Incorporated. News trend score: 80. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
68
Fundamentals
31
Technical
31
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-29%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+32
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality disconnect** (gap: 38) where extreme valuation (+268% vs. DCF) and euphoric sentiment (100/100) coexist with weak momentum (-2.0% ROC) and underperformance vs. peers. Overconfidence (55) dominates, likely driven by selective focus on positive news while ignoring lagging fundamentals. Loss aversion (38) may temper aggressive selling, but the key question remains: *Will traders double down on overvaluation despite deteriorating relative performance?*
Updated: 09/06/2026, 06:47 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Patel reduced his direct holdings by 9%, retaining 188,791 shares worth $19.06 million."
"This withholding was automatic and tied to tax obligations from equity award vesting, not a discretionary sale."
"Synaptics is being acquired by ON Semiconductor in an all-stock deal, expected to close mid-2027."
"Why Synaptics' Product Chief Filing Connects to Core IoT Sales Growing 24%"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides the historical methodologies sharply, with a clear divide between those who see it as a high-conviction opportunity and those who flag it as risky or overvalued. Schwager, Marks (Market Cycle), and Nelson all rate it favorably—between 67 and 76—highlighting its cyclical positioning and reward/risk potential, suggesting they’d view it as a disciplined, trend-aligned play. Meanwhile, the lower-scoring camp—including Graham, Fisher, and Veblen—rejects it outright, citing valuation gaps, lack of quality growth, or speculative excesses that conflict with their core principles. Even moderate voices like Mackay (65) and Bagehot (25) clash, with the former spotting early crowd enthusiasm while the latter warns of liquidity risks. The split underscores a fundamental tension: whether SYNA’s cyclical tailwinds justify the risks or if its volatility and speculative traits make it a red flag for patient, value-oriented investors.
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 57
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 25
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 19
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 9
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 8
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 6 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
44.7%
Operating Margin
-5.6%
Net Margin
-41.0%
EBITDA Margin
-5.6%
ROE
-52.8%
ROA
-23.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$12.62
Cash
$442.50M
Total Debt
$837.30M
Current Ratio
1.12
Debt/Equity
0.90
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$95.36
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$26.92
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-71.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-1.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.9% | $99.44M | $91.23M |
| 2 | -0.8% | $98.63M | $83.01M |
| 3 | 0.3% | $98.91M | $76.38M |
| 4 | 1.4% | $100.29M | $71.05M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $102.80M | $66.81M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$101.40M
Terminal Value
$1.62B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.05B
Enterprise Value
$1.44B
Net Debt
$394.80M
Equity Value
$1.05B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$23.89
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$3.36
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 13 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Motley Fool · 23.8.2026
Motley Fool · 23.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Motley Fool · 23.8.2026
Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 39/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SYNA currently scores 39/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SYNA's estimated fair value is $26.92, which is 71.8% below the current price of $95.36. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SYNA's technical score is 31/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; Gross margin: 44.7% — strong; Revenue growth (last year): 11.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $26.92 vs. price $95.36 (-71.8%); Operating margin: -5.6% (negative); Net margin: -41.0% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SYNA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 14 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gupta Vikram | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 101,168 | -2,300 | $94.06 |
| Gupta Vikram | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 99,191 | -1,977 | $95.00 |
| Gupta Vikram | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 2,300 | -2,300 | $94.06 |
| Gupta Vikram | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 1,977 | -1,977 | $95.00 |
| Patel Rahul G. | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 2,276 | -2,276 | $105.39 |
| Gupta Vikram | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,477 | -1,477 | $104.69 |
| Song Esther | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 164 | -164 | $104.78 |
| Song Esther | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 96 | -96 | $103.55 |
| Bodensteiner Lisa | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 2,200 | -2,200 | $103.47 |
| Bodensteiner Lisa | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 2,156 | -2,156 | $104.63 |
| Bodensteiner Lisa | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,700 | -1,700 | $102.54 |
| Song Esther | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 177 | -177 | $102.73 |
| Gupta Vikram | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,633 | -1,633 | $102.77 |
| Gupta Vikram | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,167 | -1,167 | $103.58 |
| Bodensteiner Lisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 28,545 | +28,545 | — |
| Ganesan Satish | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 15,954 | -15,954 | $110.58 |
| Song Esther | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 972 | -972 | $110.58 |
| Patel Rahul G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 85,574 | +85,574 | — |
| Ganesan Satish | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 30,643 | +30,643 | — |
| Gupta Vikram | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 15,267 | +15,267 | — |
| Rizvi Ken | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 17,251 | -17,251 | $110.58 |
| Gupta Vikram | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 34,622 | +34,622 | — |
| Rizvi Ken | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 31,720 | +31,720 | — |
| Gupta Vikram | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 17,705 | -17,705 | $110.58 |
| Song Esther | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 4,711 | +4,711 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,428,878 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,882,267 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology