Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$88.76
▼ $2.56 (-2.8%)
Market data updated: 09/21 04:43 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$87.48 - $92.05
52-Week Range
$51.93 - $92.30
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$55.43
Resistance
$92.30
SWKS is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+15.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/33 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.17
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
65
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $85.59
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 67)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $88.35
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 79)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $88.35
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 50 to 79 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
18d ago · $71.10
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 16 to 45 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
92
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
70
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING SWKS...
Recent media coverage of **Skyworks Solutions** has centered on its leadership and market positioning amid industry challenges. The company’s chairman, Chris King—a semiconductor veteran with over 50 years of experience—has been highlighted for her expertise, including her tenure as the first female CEO of a chip firm. Additionally, Skyworks is preparing to participate in the **Goldman Sachs Communacopia and Technology Conference**, where executives will discuss its role in analog and mixed-signal semiconductors. Some analysts have noted cautious forecasts, suggesting lingering concerns about the broader semiconductor cycle.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Skyworks Solutions. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
64
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
70
Technical
92
Valuation
50
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
80
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+43
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are fixated on a near-term resistance level (1.1% away), with anchoring dominating at 79. FOMO and euphoria coexist due to strong momentum and overbought conditions, despite valuation gaps. Confirmation bias persists as narrative optimism outpaces stagnant fundamentals. The key question: will traders break free from anchoring if resistance is tested, or will momentum sustain despite valuation concerns? Overconfidence hints at potential detachment from fundamentals, but no clear panic or herd-driven shifts are evident.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:49 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:SWKS) announced it has pushed Qorvo bond exchange deadline to Sept. 11 as merger closing nears"
"Chris King, Chairman of Skyworks Solutions, introduced as a semiconductor industry veteran with over 50 years of experience"
"Skyworks to present at Goldman Sachs Communacopia and Technology Conference"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Walter Bagehot’s documented emphasis on liquidity and Jesse Livermore’s focus on price trends, the model estimates a relatively strong case for the stock, reflected in scores in the mid‑80s. In contrast, investors who stress safety margins, valuation and market efficiency—such as Graham, Marks, and the efficient‑market duo—produce mixed to modest scores in the 40‑50 range, indicating uncertainty or limited edge. Methodologies that prioritize growth quality, cycle timing, and behavioral risks—like Fisher, Lynch, Veblen, Mackay, and Nelson—assign low scores below 30, signaling concerns about overvaluation, volatility, or crowd‑driven momentum. This spread of conclusions stems from each investor’s distinct criteria, with liquidity and trend‑following yielding optimism while valuation, risk control, and cycle considerations generate caution.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 86
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 81
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 52
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 46
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 26
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 24
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 13
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 8
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (11 bullish · 1 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
41.2%
Operating Margin
12.2%
Net Margin
11.7%
EBITDA Margin
12.2%
ROE
8.3%
ROA
6.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.09
Cash
$1.16B
Total Debt
$995.80M
Current Ratio
2.33
Debt/Equity
0.17
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 26.5.2026 | $0.710 |
| 25.5.2026 | $0.710 |
| 24.2.2026 | $0.710 |
| 23.2.2026 | $0.710 |
| 18.11.2025 | $0.710 |
| 17.11.2025 | $0.710 |
| 26.8.2025 | $0.710 |
| 25.8.2025 | $0.710 |
| 27.5.2025 | $0.700 |
| 26.5.2025 | $0.700 |
| 24.2.2025 | $0.700 |
| 23.2.2025 | $0.700 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$88.76
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$95.26
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+7.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $1.05B | $963.77M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $1.02B | $856.56M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $1.00B | $776.01M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $1.01B | $716.39M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.04B | $673.67M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.11B
Terminal Value
$16.35B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$10.62B
Enterprise Value
$14.61B
Net Debt
$-165.50M
Equity Value
$14.78B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$37.12
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.87
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 65/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SWKS currently scores 65/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SWKS's estimated fair value is $95.26, which is 7.3% above the current price of $88.76. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SWKS's technical score is 92/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.17; Current ratio: 2.33; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.6% of price; Calmar: -0.05 (3y annualized return -3.2% / max drawdown 59.2%).
Yes — SWKS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carter Philip Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.9.2026 | 9,917 | -9,917 | — |
| Carter Philip Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.9.2026 | 9,917 | +9,917 | — |
| Carter Philip Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 5,046 | -5,046 | $75.38 |
| BEEBE KEVIN L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | +3,664 | — |
| Batey Alan S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | +3,664 | — |
| BEEBE KEVIN L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | -3,664 | — |
| KING CHRISTINE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 4,071 | -4,071 | — |
| KING CHRISTINE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 4,071 | +4,071 | — |
| David P McGlade | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | -3,664 | — |
| Guerin Eric | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | -3,664 | — |
| Guerin Eric | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | +3,664 | — |
| SCHRIESHEIM ROBERT A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | +3,664 | — |
| SCHRIESHEIM ROBERT A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | -3,664 | — |
| Turcke Maryann | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | +3,664 | — |
| McBride Suzanne E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | -3,664 | — |
| Batey Alan S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | -3,664 | — |
| David P McGlade | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | +3,664 | — |
| McBride Suzanne E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | +3,664 | — |
| Turcke Maryann | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 3,664 | -3,664 | — |
| McBride Suzanne E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 11,262 | +3,664 | — |
| McBride Suzanne E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 0 | -3,664 | — |
| BEEBE KEVIN L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 56,669 | +3,664 | — |
| BEEBE KEVIN L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 0 | -3,664 | — |
| KING CHRISTINE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 29,400 | +4,071 | — |
| KING CHRISTINE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 0 | -4,071 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
34,558,719 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 31,330,554 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 71.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology