Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$8.15
▼ $0.21 (-2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/28 09:58 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/28/2026
Market Cap
$276.17M
Day Range
$8.14 - $8.49
52-Week Range
$3.07 - $14.39
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$6.20
Resistance
$9.20
SVCO is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+43.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$20.65 vs. price $8.15 (-353.4%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
80
Risk
34
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
31
Institutional
9
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Silvaco Group, Inc. has centered on its strategic partnerships and financial performance. The company announced a collaboration with Dassault Systèmes to develop workflows for semiconductor manufacturing, emphasizing advancements in "first-time-right" production. Additionally, Silvaco reported Q2 2026 earnings, including adjusted EPS of $0.01 (matching estimates) and a 105% year-over-year improvement, though sales slightly missed forecasts. Analysts also highlighted Q3 revenue guidance of $15.3M–$18.7M, below expectations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Silvaco Group, Inc.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 17 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
53
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
76
Fundamentals
31
Technical
80
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-41%
Market Narrative
77
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+42
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme loss aversion (97) reflects a defensive posture, likely rooted in the stock’s steep 3-month drop (-42.1%). Low volume (0.74x avg) and muted volatility (0.73x ATR) suggest hesitation rather than panic, while neutral sentiment (62) prevents FOMO or euphoria. The narrative gap (12) hints at a disconnect between perceived risks and technical stability. The key question: *Will traders prioritize risk mitigation or await a catalyst to rebalance?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:41 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Silvaco, Dassault Systemes to jointly develop workflows for semiconductor manufacturing"
"Silvaco shares jump after partnering with NVIDIA on AI-powered semiconductor digital twins"
"reported quarterly earnings of $0.01 per share which met the analyst consensus estimate. This is a 105 percent increase over losses of $(0.20) per share from the same period last year"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 74/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some seeing it as a rare opportunity and others flagging it as a high-risk proposition. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology analysis, Howard Marks’ market cycle assessment, and Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s valuation-based cycle view—all suggest the stock isn’t caught up in speculative frenzy or overvalued, implying a relatively stable or favorable position. Conversely, the lowest scores—from Morgan Housel’s patience-focused framework, Jesse Livermore’s trend-following rules, and Benjamin Graham’s defensive investing criteria—paint a starkly different picture, warning of volatility, poor trend alignment, and weak fundamental safety margins. Meanwhile, the middle-ground methodologies like Philip Fisher’s quality focus and Gerald Loeb’s risk aversion further complicate the debate, signaling that while the stock may have *some* merits, it lacks the depth of competitive advantage or stability required by those frameworks. The contrast underscores a fundamental tension: is SVCO a disciplined, cyclically positioned bet (as Mackay or Marks might see it) or a speculative gamble (as Livermore or Housel would dismiss it)?
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 74
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 60
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 46
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 39
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 28
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 27
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 26
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 20
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 18
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 15
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 13
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 6
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
78.3%
Operating Margin
-72.8%
Net Margin
-65.3%
EBITDA Margin
-67.3%
ROE
-54.9%
ROA
-33.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.39
Cash
$9.01M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.20
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$8.15
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$20.65
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-353.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
7.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.8% | $-37.23M | $-34.16M |
| 2 | 6.5% | $-39.65M | $-33.38M |
| 3 | 5.2% | $-41.71M | $-32.20M |
| 4 | 3.8% | $-43.31M | $-30.68M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-44.39M | $-28.85M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-34.52M
Terminal Value
$-699.97M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-454.93M
Enterprise Value
$-614.20M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-614.20M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.52
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.64
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 17 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 18.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
MarketBeat · 7.8.2026
Moby · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 27.7.2026
MT Newswires · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.7.2026
Benzinga · 26.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 23.7.2026
Silvaco Group, Inc. (SVCO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SVCO currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SVCO's estimated fair value is -$20.65, which is 353.4% below the current price of $8.15. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SVCO's technical score is 80/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$20.65 vs. price $8.15 (-353.4%); Operating margin: -72.8% (negative); Net margin: -65.3% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SVCO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHINES WALDEN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.8.2026 | 539,209 | +250,376 | — |
| RHINES WALDEN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.8.2026 | 250,376 | +250,376 | — |
| Jackson Candace | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 46,279 | -3,500 | $7.00 |
| Jackson Candace | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $7.00 |
| Zegarelli Christopher John | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 2,257 | -2,257 | $7.55 |
| Jackson Candace | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 1,570 | -1,570 | $7.55 |
| Jackson Candace | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 49,779 | -1,570 | $7.55 |
| Zegarelli Christopher John | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 540,324 | -2,257 | $7.55 |
| Bo-Linn Cheemin | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,400 | +1,400 | — |
| Ngai-Pesic Katherine S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 2,504 | +2,504 | — |
| Tewksbury Ted L III | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,159 | +1,159 | — |
| Ganti Anita | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,721 | +1,721 | — |
| Bo-Linn Cheemin | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 700 | -700 | $7.28 |
| Pesic Illiya I. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,409 | +1,409 | — |
| Ngai Anthony K.K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 2,746 | +2,746 | — |
| Ngai Anthony K.K. | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 750 | +750 | $7.37 |
| Tewksbury Ted L III | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 580 | -580 | $7.28 |
| Tewksbury Ted L III | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 18,723 | +1,159 | — |
| Tewksbury Ted L III | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 18,143 | -580 | $7.28 |
| Bo-Linn Cheemin | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 18,964 | +1,400 | — |
| Ngai-Pesic Katherine S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 9,178,907 | +2,504 | — |
| Bo-Linn Cheemin | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 18,264 | -700 | $7.28 |
| Ganti Anita | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 64,534 | +1,721 | — |
| Ngai Anthony K.K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 118,222 | +2,746 | — |
| Pesic Illiya I. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 5,396,081 | +1,409 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,404,287 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,175,441 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology