Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$184.40
▲ $1.53 (+0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/21 11:41 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$50.66B
Day Range
$183.05 - $185.46
52-Week Range
$104.64 - $195.93
Beta
—
Next Earnings
14.10.2026
Support
$175.50
Resistance
$195.93
STT is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+61.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $623.57 vs. price $184.40 (+238.2%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
67
Quality
50
Value
62
Momentum
39
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
61
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING STT...
Recent media coverage of State Street Corporation (STT) has centered on its strong stock performance and investor attention, particularly its role as a major custody and asset servicing bank. The company’s shares have surged, with a 30-day gain of 3.85%, a 90-day rise of 20.10%, and a remarkable 76.42% year-to-date return, prompting valuation reassessments. Analysts highlight its technical strength and recent ETF launch—including a $2.5 billion fund—while broader market trends show mixed investor flows, with some sectors facing withdrawals amid rally-driven shifts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about State Street Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
28
Fundamentals
61
Technical
39
Valuation
62
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+9%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring suggests traders are fixated on the near-term resistance level, ignoring broader valuation gaps. Euphoria and herding coexist but are muted by the stock’s slight underperformance relative to peers. The narrative-reality gap (19 points) hints at overoptimism about fundamentals. The key question: will traders break free from resistance, or will anchoring persist despite valuation disconnects?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:24 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"State Street (NYSE: STT) and UC Investments launched the SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF with a US$2.5b anchor investment from UC."
"The 1 year total shareholder return of 76.42% points to a powerful longer term trend."
"State Street Corp (STT) earns a 10/10 technical rating and 9/10 setup quality, signaling a strong uptrend and low-risk breakout opportunity."
"Investors are reassessing the stock using its latest return and earnings data."
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for STT reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Philip Fisher’s high score suggests he sees solid fundamentals, though not exceptional quality, aligning with his focus on long-term industry leadership and management competence. In contrast, the lowest scores—particularly from Graham’s Enterprising Investor framework, Nelson’s cycle analysis, and Schwager’s disciplined trading approach—indicate a consensus that the stock either lacks sufficient margin of safety, shows late-cycle warning signs, or fails to meet rigorous technical or valuation thresholds. Meanwhile, mid-range scores from Marks and Mackay hint at a mixed bag: the business may be sound, but market sentiment or inflated expectations could pose risks, while Lynch’s low score underscores a failure to meet his growth-at-a-reasonable-price criterion. The contrast between Fisher’s cautious optimism and the more skeptical, data-driven approaches highlights how subjective quality assessments clash with quantitative or cyclical caution.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 71
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 56
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 52
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 45
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 42
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 33
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 8
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
27.4%
Net Margin
22.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.6%
ROA
0.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.55
Cash
$4.43B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.07
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.7.2026 | $0.840 |
| 30.6.2026 | $0.840 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.840 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.840 |
| 2.1.2026 | $0.840 |
| 1.1.2026 | $0.840 |
| 1.10.2025 | $0.840 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.840 |
| 1.7.2025 | $0.760 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.760 |
| 1.4.2025 | $0.760 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.760 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$184.40
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$623.57
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+238.2%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8% | $11.36B | $10.43B |
| 2 | 4.2% | $11.85B | $9.97B |
| 3 | 3.7% | $12.28B | $9.48B |
| 4 | 3.1% | $12.66B | $8.97B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $12.97B | $8.43B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$10.84B
Terminal Value
$204.56B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$132.95B
Enterprise Value
$180.22B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$180.22B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$99.76
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$96.41
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
StockStory · 21.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Motley Fool · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Investing.com · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Wealth Management · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Barchart · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
TheStreet · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
State Street Corporation (STT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
STT currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, STT's estimated fair value is $623.57, which is 238.2% above the current price of $184.40. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
STT's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $623.57 vs. price $184.40 (+238.2%); Free cash flow growth: 176.7%; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — STT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 16 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RICHARDS MICHAEL L | Gift | 2.9.2026 | 1,009 | -1,009 | — |
| Read Craig Jack | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 9,408 | +9,408 | — |
| O HANLEY RONALD P | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 2,204 | -2,204 | — |
| O HANLEY RONALD P | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 2,204 | +2,204 | — |
| O HANLEY RONALD P | Gift | 14.8.2026 | 10,500 | -10,500 | — |
| TAHIRI MOSTAPHA | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.8.2026 | 54 | -54 | $191.74 |
| RICHARDS MICHAEL L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.8.2026 | 196 | -196 | $191.74 |
| O HANLEY RONALD P | Disposition to the Company | 14.8.2026 | 2,204 | -2,204 | $183.75 |
| Schaefer Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $181.19 |
| Schaefer Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 8,073 | -500 | $181.19 |
| Hu W. Bradford | Open Market Sale | 24.7.2026 | 9,758 | -9,758 | $184.52 |
| Hu W. Bradford | Open Market Sale | 24.7.2026 | 49,794 | -9,758 | $184.52 |
| O HANLEY RONALD P | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 14,553 | -14,553 | $184.17 |
| Horgan Kathryn M | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 5,523 | -5,523 | $184.17 |
| O HANLEY RONALD P | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 240,959 | -14,553 | $184.17 |
| Horgan Kathryn M | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 103,171 | -5,523 | $184.17 |
| Horgan Kathryn M | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 5,500 | -5,500 | $162.78 |
| Horgan Kathryn M | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 108,694 | -5,500 | $162.78 |
| RICHARDS MICHAEL L | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $162.14 |
| RICHARDS MICHAEL L | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 41,827 | -1,500 | $162.14 |
| Hu W. Bradford | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 9,212 | -9,212 | $155.35 |
| O HANLEY RONALD P | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 14,553 | -14,553 | $155.35 |
| O HANLEY RONALD P | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 255,512 | -14,553 | $155.35 |
| Hu W. Bradford | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 59,552 | -9,212 | $155.35 |
| Gordon Susan M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,526 | +1,526 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,671,416 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,853,653 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology