Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$0.36
▲ $0.04 (+12.3%)
Market data updated: 09/17 06:58 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$74.33M
Day Range
$0.32 - $0.36
52-Week Range
$0.20 - $2.27
Beta
—
Next Earnings
19.10.2026
-77.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 175.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -9.0% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
13d ago · $0.40
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 58)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
43
Risk
32
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
42
Institutional
63
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of SunPower Inc. has centered on its volatile stock performance tied to a $26.2 million equity private placement. After a 60% surge on September 3, shares later dropped 17.2% the following day, sparking speculation of a short squeeze. The company announced the funding round, which aimed to bolster its financial position, but market reactions remained mixed amid broader investor attention.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SunPower Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
45
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
47
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
42
Technical
43
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-54%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
47
Narrative Gap
+41
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for SPWR strongly suggests **FOMO** is the dominant psychological state, driven by extreme momentum, volume, and sentiment. Overconfidence aligns with price outpacing fundamentals, while loss aversion hints at lingering caution despite the rally. The **narrative gap (41 points)** implies traders may be overestimating positive catalysts relative to fundamentals. The key question: *Will momentum sustain, or will traders exit before fundamentals catch up?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:14 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""SunPower Inc. announced it has raised $26.2 million in an equity private placement round""
""SunPower shares fall 17.2% following $26.2M private placement" / "SunPower stock surges Thursday" / "SunPower soars 60% on $26.2M raise""
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Gerald M. Loeb — 33/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with some models seeing it as a high-potential opportunity while others flag significant risks or uncertainty. Peter Lynch and Jack Schwager both rate it near the top, viewing it as a disciplined growth play where the price hasn’t fully reflected its fundamentals or reward potential. Meanwhile, value-oriented investors like Benjamin Graham and the efficient-market theorists dismiss it outright, either because it fails traditional valuation tests or because the evidence for outperformance isn’t compelling. The middle ground—where investors like Fisher, Marks, and Smith see it as solid but not exceptional—suggests the stock may have merit, but not the kind of transformative quality that would justify aggressive bets. The stark contrast between the high-scoring growth-focused models and the low-scoring risk-averse or valuation-driven ones highlights a fundamental disagreement: whether the stock’s momentum or structural advantages justify the price, or if it’s already priced for perfection with little margin for error.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 94
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 65
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 64
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 53
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 49
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 40
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 35
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 6 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
43.1%
Operating Margin
-9.0%
Net Margin
-15.1%
EBITDA Margin
-8.0%
ROE
50.3%
ROA
-18.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.52
Cash
$9.62M
Total Debt
$189.07M
Current Ratio
0.73
Debt/Equity
-2.10
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
-$1.03
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$2.34
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.9.2026
ChartMill · 3.9.2026
ChartMill · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Associated Press · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
MarketBeat · 27.8.2026
SunPower Inc. (SPWR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SPWR currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SPWR's technical score is 43/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 175.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 57.4%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -9.0% (negative); Net margin: -15.1% (negative); ATR: 12.1% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SPWR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 12 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gishen Adam | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 70,000 | -70,000 | $0.31 |
| Anderson William James | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 1,180,637 | +1,180,637 | $0.25 |
| Whatley Devin | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 393,545 | +393,545 | $0.25 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 4.9.2026 | 7,870,917 | +7,870,917 | $0.25 |
| MCCRANIE J DANIEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 983,864 | +983,864 | $0.25 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 633,250 | +633,250 | — |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 7,226,186 | +7,226,186 | — |
| MCCRANIE J DANIEL | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 93,650 | +93,650 | — |
| Kowalczuk Tom | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,000,000 | +1,000,000 | — |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 23.4.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 8.4.2026 | 0 | +0 | $5,000,000.00 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 29.1.2026 | 0 | +0 | $3,300,000.00 |
| Thiam Tidjane | Open Market Sale | 16.12.2025 | 80,245 | -86,956 | $1.60 |
| Thiam Tidjane | Open Market Purchase | 24.10.2025 | 167,201 | +86,956 | $2.01 |
| Gishen Adam | Open Market Sale | 23.10.2025 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $2.04 |
| Gishen Adam | Open Market Sale | 23.10.2025 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $2.04 |
| Gishen Adam | Open Market Sale | 23.10.2025 | 109,999 | -10,000 | $2.04 |
| Gishen Adam | Open Market Sale | 23.10.2025 | 99,999 | -10,000 | $2.04 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 3.6.2025 | 303,000 | +303,000 | $1.68 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 3.6.2025 | 303,000 | +303,000 | $1.68 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2025 | 10,588 | +10,588 | $1.49 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2025 | 10,589 | +10,589 | $1.49 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 30.5.2025 | 150,000 | +150,000 | $1.38 |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Open Market Purchase | 30.5.2025 | 150,000 | +150,000 | $1.38 |
| Gishen Adam | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2025 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $1.92 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,488,224 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,483,716 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology