Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$34.32
▼ $0.06 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/25 10:15 AM
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
$7.15B
Day Range
$34.11 - $34.54
52-Week Range
$25.02 - $39.02
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$34.11
Resistance
$39.02
SOBO is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+21.9% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
South Bow (SOBO) earned an investorScore of 85 and a STRONG rating, reflecting a generally positive technical backdrop combined with excellent news sentiment, but tempered by moderate risk metrics. The technical suite shows the price sitting above both the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 56.3, all indicating healthy upward momentum and a neutral stochastic %K at 52.3. These factors underpin the high technical score of 86. News coverage is uniformly favorable, with a perfect score of 100 driven by strong Q2 2026 earnings, new contracts, and neutral-to‑positive commentary on the company’s AI‑related natural‑gas initiatives. Conversely, the risk category scores only 50, highlighting an average true range of 2.3% of price and a Calmar ratio of 1.50, suggesting the stock could face notable drawdowns despite its upside potential. The sole explicit concern is that the price is below the SAR point, which traditionally signals a bearish trend. Together, the strengths in price positioning, momentum indicators, and earnings narrative outweigh the identified bearish technical signal and moderate volatility, resulting in the overall strong score. However, the modest risk rating signals that investors should remain aware of potential volatility and downside risk, especially if the SAR‑indicated downtrend reasserts itself.
Price is above the 50‑day and 200‑day averages, MACD histogram is positive, RSI is 56.3, and %K is neutral at 52.3.
These metrics collectively indicate strong upward momentum and a healthy price trend.
All news items are neutral or positive, including strong Q2 earnings, new contracts, and AI‑related natural‑gas developments, yielding a perfect news score of 100.
Positive news reinforces investor confidence and supports price appreciation.
ATR equals 2.3% of price and the Calmar ratio is 1.50, implying moderate volatility and a potential 20.2% maximum drawdown.
Higher volatility and drawdown potential increase the risk profile of the investment.
StockIQ conclusion
South Bow exhibits strong technical momentum and a highly favorable news environment, which drive its robust overall score. Nevertheless, the bearish SAR signal and moderate risk indicators caution investors to monitor price trends and volatility. The stock’s outlook remains positive, provided that earnings momentum continues and risk factors do not intensify.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
14d ago · $36.64
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
14d ago · $36.57
Evidence: -114.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
15d ago · $37.25
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $37.73
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
22d ago · $37.31
Evidence: 8 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
23d ago · $37.81
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
24d ago · $37.77
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $37.43
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $37.28
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 28, 2026
Then
82
$37.28
Now
46
$34.32
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage regarding South Bow Corporation focuses on its strong second-quarter 2026 financial performance, driven by high throughput and elevated demand on its
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about South Bow Corporation Common. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
88
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SOBO’s psychology is fragmented but dominated by Euphoria, where extreme positive sentiment (100/100) and a 3.5% premium to the 200-day average override weak momentum (-1.5% ROC). This disconnect—between detached optimism and neutral technicals—suggests traders may be ignoring recent underperformance relative to peers. The key question is whether this narrative gap (62 vs. 50) persists or if reality (e.g., a pullback) forces a re-evaluation. The absence of panic or herding implies no immediate crisis, but the lack of confirmation bias or anchoring evidence keeps the euphoria speculative. Volatility remains subdued (0.99x ATR), reducing urgency for corrective action.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 04:35 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Strong throughput drives guidance raise and $665M cash flow outlook."
"secures 465,000 barrels per day in 20-year contracts"
"affirming its dividend and securing 20 year commitments backing the Prairie Connector and Liberty Bridge growth projects"
"elevated demand on the U.S. Gulf Coast portion of its Keystone Pipeline System"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 33/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here reveal a stark divide between those that see potential in SOBO’s technical or cyclical positioning and those that either lack sufficient data or see it as a high-risk or ambiguous bet. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay both flag signs of opportunity—Nelson’s score suggests the stock may be oversold and ripe for a rebound, while Mackay detects crowd-driven excitement that could fuel further gains. In contrast, most value-oriented models like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch can’t form a definitive opinion due to insufficient fundamental data, while the efficient-market camp dismisses it as unexceptional. Even the cautious approaches of Gerald Loeb and Howard Marks (both scoring in the mid-40s to low-50s) acknowledge risks, either from capital exposure or inflated expectations, leaving SOBO as a speculative play for those who prioritize technical or cyclical cues over traditional valuation.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 71
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 55
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.500 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.500 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.500 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.500 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.500 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.500 |
| 31.12.2024 | $0.500 |
| 30.12.2024 | $0.500 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Yahoo · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
MarketBeat · 9.8.2026
Yahoo · 9.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 6.8.2026
Yahoo · 6.8.2026
Moby · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Yahoo · 6.8.2026
MT Newswires · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for South Bow Corporation Common (SOBO) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for SOBO specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
SOBO's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -8.6% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — SOBO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,114,843 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 11,058,054 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology