Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$8.23
▼ $0.11 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:46 PM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$715.70M
Day Range
$8.10 - $8.36
52-Week Range
$2.22 - $9.87
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$5.95
Resistance
$9.50
SMWB is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-16.4% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 4/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $8.89
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $8.89
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $8.74
Evidence: -5.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
18d ago · $9.09
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
18d ago · $9.09
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
24d ago · $8.93
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
24d ago · $8.93
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
79
$8.93
Now
60
$8.23
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
52
Risk
34
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Similarweb Ltd. has centered on its stock performance and strategic partnerships. Analysts have raised the company’s fair value estimate to around $10.8 per share, citing strong contract momentum, higher annual recurring revenue (ARR), and updated guidance. Additionally, Similarweb’s collaboration with NIQ to develop AI-driven "agentic commerce" measurement tools—tracking how AI influences consumer purchasing—has been highlighted as a key innovation for the evolving digital economy. Price targets for the stock have also seen a significant increase.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Similarweb Ltd.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
42
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
52
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+65%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SMWB’s market behavior suggests a dominant euphoric state, driven by extreme valuation (+67.8% above 200-day average) and overwhelmingly positive sentiment (92/100). While FOMO is present, it’s muted by neutral RSI and moderate volume, indicating cautious excitement rather than reckless chasing. The narrative gap (14 points) hints at potential disconnects between investor enthusiasm and underlying fundamentals. The key question: will euphoria sustain momentum, or will lagging peer performance signal a shift in sentiment?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 11:26 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Similarweb’s estimated fair value has been reset higher in recent models, moving from about US$5.8 to about US$10.8 per share."
"Analysts link this shift to the latest contract wins, higher ARR and updated guidance"
"collaboration to enhance NIQ’s Agentic Commerce Measurement strategy"
"Earnings Estimates Rising for Similarweb (SMWB): Will It Gain?"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s documented principles, the model estimates a favorable cycle position for SMWB, reflected in his high 87 score, while Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and several others report a neutral 50 because they lack sufficient balance‑sheet, valuation or growth data to form a definitive read. In contrast, trend‑focused investors like Jesse Livermore (score 42) and crowd‑sentiment analysts such as Charles Mackay (score 41) flag negative signals, with Livermore noting a contrary trend and Mackay identifying a potential crowd delusion. Howard Marks’ cycle‑focused view (score 40) places the stock in the middle of a market cycle, but his broader risk‑valuation lens (score 18) and Gerald Loeb’s risk‑averse stance (score 21) raise caution, indicating concerns about capital preservation. Finally, the most risk‑averse viewpoint from Morgan Housel (score 0) highlights volatility that could unsettle patient holders, underscoring why the methodologies diverge from optimistic to highly cautious conclusions.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 83
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 39
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 30
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 16
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Fintel · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Business Wire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for SMWB specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
SMWB's technical score is 52/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; +63.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.5% of price; Calmar: 0.18 (3y annualized return 15.6% / max drawdown 86.7%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SMWB.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offer Or | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 86,300 | -86,300 | $8.06 |
| Offer Or | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 60,700 | -60,700 | $8.33 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 0 | -140,008 | — |
| Offer Or | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 4,598,291 | -164,817 | $9.00 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 4,637,291 | +39,000 | $0.40 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 400,000 | -164,817 | — |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 4,637,593 | +39,302 | $2.71 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 4,763,108 | +164,817 | $2.71 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 4,738,299 | +140,008 | $3.04 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 700,000 | -39,000 | — |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 140,008 | -140,008 | — |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 140,008 | +140,008 | $3.04 |
| Offer Or | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 140,008 | -140,008 | $9.01 |
| Offer Or | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 39,000 | -39,000 | $9.00 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 39,000 | -39,000 | — |
| Offer Or | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 39,302 | -39,302 | $9.01 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 164,817 | +164,817 | $2.71 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 39,302 | -39,302 | — |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 164,817 | -164,817 | — |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 39,000 | +39,000 | $0.40 |
| Offer Or | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 164,817 | -164,817 | $9.00 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 39,302 | +39,302 | $2.71 |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | — |
| Offer Or | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 59,992 | -59,992 | — |
| Offer Or | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | $8.85 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
640,766 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 597,700 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 36.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology