Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$32.46
▲ $1.88 (+6.1%)
Market data updated: 09/10 02:29 AM
Fundamentals updated: 08/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$31.11 - $32.66
52-Week Range
—
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$30.48
Resistance
$39.93
SKYT is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+130.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 29.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$28.24 vs. price $32.46 (-187.0%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (43/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
43
Momentum
40
Risk
42
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of SkyWater Technology Inc. has primarily centered on its acquisition by IonQ, a quantum computing firm, with headlines emphasizing the deal’s closure in early August 2026. Reports highlight strategic growth, record Q2 2026 revenue, and market speculation about valuation and future potential, though details on SkyWater’s standalone operations are sparse. Most focus remains on the deal’s implications for IonQ rather than SkyWater’s independent performance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SkyWater Technology Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 6 of the last 13 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
27
Fundamentals
62
Technical
40
Valuation
43
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SKYT’s market behavior suggests a FOMO-driven narrative—positive momentum, high sentiment, and overbought Bollinger %B align with speculative interest, though volume remains muted. The narrative-reality gap (18-point divergence) hints at optimism exceeding fundamentals, as EPS growth outpaces price gains. Herding is absent, and euphoria is restrained by neutral RSI and modest overvaluation. The key question: *Is this momentum self-sustaining, or will fading sentiment (e.g., from peers’ underperformance) trigger a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 06:55 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"IonQ (IONQ) Closed Its SkyWater Deal, Is The Valuation Gap Still Real?"
"SkyWater Technology Inc (SKYT) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Record Revenue and Strategic..."
"GF Value Sees 42% Downside"
"SkyWater Technology (SKYT) Deal Closes, Is The Remaining Upside Already Priced In?"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Peter Lynch’s high score (88) and growth-focused verdict suggesting it’s a compelling long-term bet where the price hasn’t yet reflected its potential, while Benjamin Graham’s near-zero scores (26 and 15) and defensive critiques imply it fails core valuation and risk thresholds. The middle ground—where Fisher, Schwager, and Veblen see solid but not exceptional quality—contrasts sharply with the outright caution of Loeb, Nelson, and Bagehot, who flag liquidity risks and overbought conditions. Even Mackay’s moderate score (77) and lack of crowd mania signals don’t bridge the gap, as the efficient-market camp dismisses the stock entirely, while Marks’ mixed verdict hints at cyclical uncertainty. The debate ultimately hinges on whether the stock’s volatility and valuation metrics justify growth optimism or if it’s a speculative gamble for patient investors.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 88
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 68
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 65
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 58
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 28
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 26
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 15
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 13
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 4
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 242 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
19.7%
Operating Margin
24.7%
Net Margin
26.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
63.3%
ROA
16.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.47
Cash
$23.22M
Total Debt
$38.88M
Current Ratio
0.60
Debt/Equity
1.33
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$32.46
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$28.24
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-187.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-66.63M | $-61.12M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-79.54M | $-66.94M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-90.47M | $-69.86M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-97.82M | $-69.30M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-100.27M | $-65.17M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-53.30M
Terminal Value
$-1.58B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-1.03B
Enterprise Value
$-1.36B
Net Debt
$15.65M
Equity Value
$-1.38B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.86
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.68
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 13 articles.
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
StockStory · 4.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.8.2026
Motley Fool · 4.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.7.2026
Yahoo · 23.7.2026
SkyWater Technology Inc. (SKYT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SKYT currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SKYT's estimated fair value is -$28.24, which is 187.0% below the current price of $32.46. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SKYT's technical score is 40/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 29.2%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1842.9%; Net income growth: 1850.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$28.24 vs. price $32.46 (-187.0%); Current ratio: 0.60; Free cash flow growth: -606.7%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SKYT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goetz Dennis J | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -4,304 | — |
| SONDERMAN THOMAS | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -722 | — |
| Unterseher Loren A | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -687,812 | — |
| LaFrence Andrew D.C. | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -4,304 | — |
| Manko Steve | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -27,646 | — |
| Humke Joseph J | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -4,304 | — |
| FARES NANCY | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -4,304 | — |
| Baxter Timothy E | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -5,738 | — |
| Hilberg Christopher | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -22,380 | — |
| Sakamoto John | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -55,919 | — |
| Daly Edward | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -4,304 | — |
| Miller Tammy J | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -4,304 | — |
| Unterseher Loren A | Gift | 28.7.2026 | 1,069,543 | -160,321 | — |
| Unterseher Loren A | Gift | 28.7.2026 | 812,139 | +160,321 | — |
| Goetz Dennis J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 28,017 | +4,304 | — |
| Unterseher Loren A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 28,017 | +4,304 | — |
| LaFrence Andrew D.C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 15,732 | +4,304 | — |
| Humke Joseph J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 28,017 | +4,304 | — |
| FARES NANCY | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 47,805 | +4,304 | — |
| Baxter Timothy E | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 17,166 | +5,738 | — |
| Daly Edward | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 39,183 | +4,304 | — |
| Miller Tammy J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 15,732 | +4,304 | — |
| Manko Steve | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 96,567 | -75,000 | $35.08 |
| Manko Steve | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.4.2026 | 234,089 | +9,215 | $10.03 |
| Manko Steve | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.4.2026 | 245,089 | +11,000 | $11.24 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,300,120 shares short as of 2026-07-31 · vs. 2,844,040 on 2026-07-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology