Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$94.54
▼ $1.28 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:26 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$537.92B
Day Range
$94.18 - $95.09
52-Week Range
$68.63 - $99.16
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.10.2026
Support
$81.47
Resistance
$99.15
SHEL is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+32.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.7% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): -6.2%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
71
Risk
64
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
61
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Shell PLC’s American Depositary Shares highlights its stock surge to 52-week highs amid broader market trends, driven primarily by strong oil prices hovering near $97–$100 per barrel. Analysts note Shell’s robust cash flow—boosted by high diesel margins exceeding $108—while also acknowledging geopolitical risks, such as Kazakhstan’s potential $5.06 billion threat, which could impact operations. The company’s share repurchase activity and favorable commodity conditions have been key focal points.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Shell PLC American Depositary Shares (each representing two (2) Ordinary Shares). News trend score: 56. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 9 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
7
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
49
Fundamentals
61
Technical
71
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+20%
Market Narrative
48
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+9
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SHEL’s psychology is dominated by anchoring (90), where traders fixate on the 0.5% resistance gap, ignoring overbought RSI and peer underperformance. Confirmation bias (25) and a +19 narrative gap further reinforce selective attention to positive momentum (+1.8% ROC) while dismissing revenue weakness (-0.1%). Herding (60) is muted, as the stock lags peers, but FOMO (43) persists due to elevated volume (1.32x) and positive sentiment. The key tension lies between rigid anchoring and the potential for narrative misalignment if momentum stalls or resistance breaks.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:30 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Shell Climbs 1.3% as $97 Oil Supercharges Its $21 Billion Cash Engine""
""Shell plc announces that on 04 September 2026 it purchased the following number of Shares for cancellation""
""Shell (SHEL) Ascends While Market Falls""
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for SHEL split sharply between those emphasizing long-term fundamentals and those flagging market timing or valuation risks. Morgan Housel and Thorstein Veblen’s high scores reflect their focus on durable value creation and patient compounding, suggesting the stock aligns with steady, real-world growth. Meanwhile, Gerald Loeb and Edgar Lawrence Smith’s moderate scores highlight a cautious but not dismissive stance, prioritizing capital preservation over aggressive bets. At the opposite end, Fisher, Nelson, and Graham’s near-zero scores stem from strict quality, valuation, and cycle-based criteria—Fisher dismisses it for lacking his signature growth/quality traits, while Graham and Nelson see it as either too risky or overvalued. The divide underscores whether the stock’s merits lie in its operational resilience (backed by Housel and Veblen) or its speculative or cyclical exposure (rejected outright by Fisher and Nelson).
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 79
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 76
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 69
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 56
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 51
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 41
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 40
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 36
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 32
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 22
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 4
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.4%
Operating Margin
11.1%
Net Margin
6.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.2%
ROA
4.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$30.22B
Total Debt
$75.64B
Current Ratio
1.30
Debt/Equity
0.43
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.781 |
| 22.5.2026 | $0.781 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.781 |
| 20.2.2026 | $0.744 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.744 |
| 14.11.2025 | $0.716 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.716 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.716 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.716 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.716 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.716 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.716 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$30.50
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$28.57
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 1 neutral, 9 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Shell PLC American Depositary Shares (each representing two (2) Ordinary Shares) (SHEL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SHEL currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SHEL's technical score is 71/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.7% of price; Debt/equity: 0.43; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): -6.2%; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; CMF 20 days: -0.14.
Yes — SHEL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
23,218,005 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 26,907,719 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology