Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$31.52
▼ $0.01 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/30 07:44 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$1.94B
Day Range
$30.75 - $32.03
52-Week Range
$28.21 - $81.25
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$29.51
Resistance
$50.93
SEDG is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-16.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 31.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $18.11 vs. price $31.52 (-42.6%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $31.52
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 49 to 17 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
21d ago · $36.43
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 19 to 49 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
27
Risk
40
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
27
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of SolarEdge Technologies has focused on its mixed financial performance and market valuation. The company saw an 8.9% stock rise after returning to profitability in Q2 2026, driven by revenue growth in Europe and U.S. commercial markets, though analysts revised estimates downward due to softer-than-expected third-quarter guidance. Valuation debates persist, with some analysts calling the stock 11% overvalued despite a recent UBS upgrade, while others highlight potential benefits from inverter restrictions and European demand. The broader solar sector’s growth contrasts with SolarEdge’s struggles, as its stock remains volatile amid policy and market uncertainties.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
89
Fundamentals
27
Technical
27
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-44%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant Loss Aversion (79) suggests traders are hesitant to realize losses after a steep 3-month drop, despite moderate momentum and valuation extremes. Overconfidence (69) coexists, likely from decoupling price gains (+17.9% ROC) from weak fundamentals (+0.8% EPS growth), creating a narrative-reality gap (41). The key question is whether traders will hold despite the 96% DCF premium or exit as FOMO (50) fades. Herding (32) is muted, as today’s underperformance vs. peers signals selective positioning rather than herd behavior.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"returned to adjusted operating profitability for the first time since second-quarter 2023 thanks to improved gross margins and tariff benefits"
"some analysts focused on potential benefits from inverter restrictions and European demand, while others emphasise softer guidance and U.S. residential weakness"
"stock has had a very tough five years, with the share price declining 87.3%, yet current valuation signals do not line up neatly"
"the one posting the worst losses also happens to be the most profitable of the group"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented methodologies and more conservative or cyclical frameworks. Peter Lynch and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) both assign near-maximum scores, viewing it as a high-potential growth play or an early-to-mid-cycle opportunity where the price hasn’t yet reflected its fundamentals. In contrast, defensive and value-driven investors like Benjamin Graham and Samuel Armstrong Nelson dismiss it outright, with Graham calling it a clear failure of his criteria and Nelson flagging it as overbought. The middle ground—represented by Fisher, Bagehot, and even Marks’ broader approach—acknowledges some merit but stops short of enthusiasm, either because the quality isn’t exceptional or liquidity/liability risks are present. Meanwhile, trend-followers like Livermore and cyclical analysts like Loeb and Nelson see red flags, either because the stock moves against their core rules or the market’s sentiment is already stretched.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 89
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 74
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 60
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 55
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 45
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 40
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 30
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 289 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
15.4%
Operating Margin
-25.5%
Net Margin
-34.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-274.5%
ROA
-68.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$6.88
Cash
$455.07M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.95
Debt/Equity
1.09
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$31.52
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$18.11
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-42.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $76.75M | $70.42M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $74.36M | $62.58M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $73.43M | $56.70M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $73.89M | $52.34M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $75.73M | $49.22M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$80.79M
Terminal Value
$1.19B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$776.17M
Enterprise Value
$1.07B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.07B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$11.34
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.18
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 5 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
PR Newswire · 14.9.2026
MarketBeat · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SEDG currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SEDG's estimated fair value is $18.11, which is 42.6% below the current price of $31.52. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SEDG's technical score is 27/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 31.4%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 78.3%; Free cash flow growth: 119.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $18.11 vs. price $31.52 (-42.6%); Operating margin: -25.5% (negative); Net margin: -34.2% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SEDG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GECHT GUY | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,634 | +2,634 | — |
| Gross Dana Rebecca | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,634 | +2,634 | — |
| Tietz Yoram | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 756 | +756 | — |
| ATKINS BETSY S | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,634 | +2,634 | — |
| AVERY MORE | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,566 | +3,566 | — |
| Almogy Gilad | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,634 | +2,634 | — |
| Gross Dana Rebecca | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 756 | +756 | — |
| AVERY MORE | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 5,741 | +5,741 | — |
| Tietz Yoram | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,634 | +2,634 | — |
| AVERY MORE | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 301,120 | +5,741 | — |
| AVERY MORE | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 304,686 | +3,566 | — |
| GECHT GUY | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 27,323 | +2,634 | — |
| ATKINS BETSY S | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 20,007 | +2,634 | — |
| Almogy Gilad | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 27,653 | +2,634 | — |
| Gross Dana Rebecca | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 19,175 | +2,634 | — |
| Gross Dana Rebecca | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 19,931 | +756 | — |
| Tietz Yoram | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 30,035 | +2,634 | — |
| Tietz Yoram | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 30,791 | +756 | — |
| Sigron Maoz | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.5.2026 | 13,984 | +13,984 | — |
| Sigron Maoz | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.5.2026 | 13,984 | +13,984 | — |
| AVERY MORE | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 1,211 | -1,211 | $38.28 |
| AVERY MORE | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 1,355 | -1,355 | $39.20 |
| AVERY MORE | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 296,590 | -1,355 | $39.20 |
| AVERY MORE | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 295,379 | -1,211 | $38.28 |
| Nir Yehoshua | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.1.2026 | 90,880 | +90,880 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,901,366 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 13,801,412 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
64.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology