Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$5.97
▼ $0.09 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/29 01:41 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$162.83M
Day Range
$5.88 - $6.24
52-Week Range
$1.26 - $12.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$3.28
Resistance
$6.45
SATL is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+84.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 37.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$6.52 vs. price $5.97 (-209.3%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $6.17
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -1 to 31 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $6.17
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 60)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $6.17
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 65 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
86
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
30
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Satellogic Inc. has centered on strategic partnerships and leadership changes. The company announced a collaboration with SynMax, making it the exclusive maritime intelligence provider for Satellogic’s Merlin constellation, which will deliver daily, high-resolution imagery for maritime domain awareness, set to launch in October 2026. Additionally, Satellogic named Dustin Greer as interim CFO in August 2026, while broader industry reports briefly noted its satellite imagery provider status amid competitor updates.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Satellogic Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
63
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
53
Psychology
76
Fundamentals
30
Technical
86
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
84
Fundamental Reality
53
Narrative Gap
+31
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant loss aversion—driven by a steep 34.8% drawdown over three months—reflects a defensive posture, where investors prioritize cutting losses over chasing gains. Herding is present but selective, as today’s outperformance (+15.3%) contrasts with peer stagnation (+3.3%), indicating opportunistic rather than blind following. The narrative gap (-16) hints at a disconnect where sentiment (37) lags reality (53), possibly reinforcing caution. The key question is whether the subdued volume (0.70x avg) signals lingering hesitation or a temporary pause before further consolidation.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 11:03 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"SynMax will be the exclusive maritime intelligence channel for data from the new Merlin Constellation"
"Merlin constellation will provide daily, one-meter-class Earth observation with dark-vessel detection"
"Satellogic appointed Dustin Greer as Interim Chief Financial Officer"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for SATL reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. The highest-scoring approaches—Bagehot’s liquidity focus, Mackay’s skepticism of crowd behavior, and Lynch’s growth-oriented lens—all suggest resilience or upside potential, framing the stock as either a safe haven or an undervalued growth play. In contrast, the mid-tier scores (Marks’ cycle analysis, Veblen’s value alignment, and Fisher’s quality assessment) lean cautiously positive but acknowledge limitations, while the lower half—particularly Graham’s defensive criteria, Livermore’s trend opposition, and the efficient-market skeptics—flag fundamental or structural concerns, questioning whether the stock’s merits justify active selection over passive strategies. The contrast underscores whether SATL is a niche opportunity (for growth or liquidity-focused investors) or a speculative bet (for those prioritizing trend alignment or statistical safety).
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 93
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 76
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 62
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 43
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 41
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 25
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 20
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 7
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-175.2%
Net Margin
-27.0%
EBITDA Margin
-175.2%
ROE
-7.9%
ROA
-3.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.04
Cash
$94.43M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
5.12
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$5.97
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$6.52
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-209.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-42.83M | $-39.29M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-51.13M | $-43.03M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-58.16M | $-44.91M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-62.88M | $-44.55M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-64.45M | $-41.89M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-34.26M
Terminal Value
$-1.02B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-660.56M
Enterprise Value
$-874.23M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-874.23M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$0.45
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.45
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Reuters · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Motley Fool · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Satellogic Inc. (SATL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SATL currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SATL's estimated fair value is -$6.52, which is 209.3% below the current price of $5.97. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SATL's technical score is 86/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 37.6%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 85.9%; Net income growth: 95.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$6.52 vs. price $5.97 (-209.3%); Operating margin: -175.2% (negative); Net margin: -27.0% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SATL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 69,463 | +1,305 | — |
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 59,253 | +87 | — |
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 68,158 | +2,823 | — |
| Kargieman Emiliano | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 291,313 | -26,483 | — |
| Kharsansky Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 83,303 | +3,424 | — |
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 59,166 | +1,746 | — |
| Kargieman Emiliano | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 175,388 | -12,527 | — |
| Kharsansky Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 79,879 | +9,462 | — |
| Kargieman Emiliano | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 1,413,242 | +20,064 | — |
| Kharsansky Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 45,000 | -7,500 | — |
| Kharsansky Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 160,222 | -14,566 | — |
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 44,668 | -4,061 | — |
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 0 | -2,512 | — |
| Kargieman Emiliano | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 1,422,732 | +9,490 | — |
| Kharsansky Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 73,793 | -5,271 | — |
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 26,296 | -1,878 | — |
| Kharsansky Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 70,417 | +4,872 | — |
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 65,335 | +6,082 | — |
| Greer Dustin Yoshio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.9.2026 | 52,500 | -8,750 | — |
| Kharsansky Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 3,418 | +3,418 | — |
| Kargieman Emiliano | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 9,491 | +9,491 | — |
| Kharsansky Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 5,271 | -5,271 | — |
| Kargieman Emiliano | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 12,528 | -12,528 | — |
| Kargieman Emiliano | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 1,393,178 | +9,491 | — |
| Kargieman Emiliano | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 187,915 | -12,528 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
19,684,398 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 18,467,745 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology