Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$20.57
▼ $0.07 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/28 11:44 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/28/2026
Market Cap
$11.74B
Day Range
$20.00 - $21.08
52-Week Range
$10.30 - $24.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
07.12.2026
Support
$14.25
Resistance
$22.28
SAIL is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-4.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 24.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $3.61 vs. price $20.57 (-82.4%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
64
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
87
Risk
40
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
35
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of SailPoint, Inc. has been limited but highlights investor sentiment and market activity. A Barclays analyst upgraded the stock to Overweight, raising the price target from $19 to $21, signaling positive expectations. However, broader tech sector weakness—driven by rising Treasury yields and market volatility—may have pressured shares. No substantive earnings or operational updates were reported, so details remain sparse.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SailPoint, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
62
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
35
Technical
87
Valuation
38
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+43%
Market Narrative
95
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+53
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s euphoric detachment from fundamentals—evidenced by a +400% DCF premium and +27.7% above 200-day averages—suggests investors are prioritizing narrative-driven optimism over valuation metrics. Overconfidence in the stock’s growth potential, despite diverging momentum, may reflect a bias toward ignoring short-term underperformance. The key open question is whether this gap between narrative (69) and reality (42) will persist or if a correction will force a reassessment of the stock’s valuation. The lack of herding or panic signals implies confidence remains anchored in the stock’s perceived upside, not collective panic or FOMO.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 02:40 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Barclays analyst Saket Kalia maintains SailPoint with an Overweight rating and raises price target to $21"
"Cantor Fitzgerald raises SailPoint price target from $23 to $25"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and more conservative methodologies. Peter Lynch’s near-perfect score (94) and 'growth candidate' verdict reflect his enthusiasm for stocks where earnings outpace valuation, suggesting SAIL’s fundamentals may be undervalued relative to its potential. Meanwhile, Fisher (74) and Smith (73) see it as a solid, long-term hold—Fisher’s higher threshold for quality notwithstanding—while mid-tier scores from Nelson (64) and Housel (63) imply it’s a playable but unremarkable pick. At the other end, the lowest scores (Veblen’s 30, Marks’ 28) flag it as speculative or overvalued, with Veblen’s critique hinting at irrational exuberance and Marks warning of risk/valuation mismatches. The contrast between Lynch’s bullishness and the majority of value/defensive frameworks (Bagehot, Livermore, Graham) underscores whether SAIL is a high-conviction growth bet or a stock better suited for passive or cautious investors.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 94
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 74
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 71
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 54
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 42
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 37
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 23
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 23
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
64.5%
Operating Margin
-28.7%
Net Margin
-25.2%
EBITDA Margin
-9.0%
ROE
-3.9%
ROA
-3.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.54
Cash
$358.14M
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
1.32
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$20.57
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$3.61
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-82.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
23.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.8% | $79.95M | $73.35M |
| 2 | 18.4% | $94.69M | $79.70M |
| 3 | 13.1% | $107.12M | $82.72M |
| 4 | 7.8% | $115.49M | $81.82M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $118.38M | $76.94M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$64.60M
Terminal Value
$1.87B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.21B
Enterprise Value
$1.61B
Net Debt
$-358.14M
Equity Value
$1.97B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$12.58
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 3 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 64/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SAIL currently scores 64/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SAIL's estimated fair value is $3.61, which is 82.4% below the current price of $20.57. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SAIL's technical score is 87/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 24.4%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 95.8%; Free cash flow growth: 157.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $3.61 vs. price $20.57 (-82.4%); Operating margin: -28.7% (negative); Net margin: -25.2% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SAIL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REZVAN MITRA | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 1,214 | -1,214 | $20.00 |
| REZVAN MITRA | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 181,427 | -1,214 | $20.00 |
| Schmitt Christopher | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 18,890 | -18,890 | $15.42 |
| Mills Matt | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 34,312 | -34,312 | $15.42 |
| Payne Abby | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 16,999 | -16,999 | $15.42 |
| McClain Mark D. | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 93,260 | -93,260 | $15.42 |
| Gnanasambandam Chandrasekar | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 19,540 | -19,540 | $15.42 |
| CAROLAN BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 46,002 | -46,002 | $15.42 |
| REZVAN MITRA | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 3,881 | -3,881 | $15.42 |
| CAROLAN BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 1,707,742 | -46,002 | $15.42 |
| McClain Mark D. | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 8,093,870 | -93,260 | $15.42 |
| Mills Matt | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 2,373,537 | -34,312 | $15.42 |
| Schmitt Christopher | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 1,312,721 | -18,890 | $15.42 |
| REZVAN MITRA | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 182,641 | -3,881 | $15.42 |
| Payne Abby | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 891,965 | -16,999 | $15.42 |
| Gnanasambandam Chandrasekar | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 934,508 | -19,540 | $15.42 |
| Schmitt Christopher | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 8,371 | -8,371 | $16.73 |
| Mills Matt | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 15,205 | -15,205 | $16.73 |
| Mills Matt | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 28,280 | -28,280 | $16.05 |
| CAROLAN BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 21,115 | -21,115 | $16.05 |
| Gnanasambandam Chandrasekar | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 5,202 | -5,202 | $16.73 |
| Payne Abby | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 14,009 | -14,009 | $16.05 |
| Schmitt Christopher | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 15,569 | -15,569 | $16.05 |
| CAROLAN BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 11,353 | -11,353 | $16.73 |
| Payne Abby | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 7,533 | -7,533 | $16.73 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
20,683,447 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 21,488,016 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology