Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$2.29
▼ $0.01 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/15 12:43 AM
News analyzed: 09/14/2026
Market Cap
$770.19M
Day Range
$2.22 - $2.30
52-Week Range
$2.05 - $8.45
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
RZLV is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-66.3% (1Y)
🔴 Weak
Strengths: 0/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.9% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
37
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
13d ago · $2.39
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 21 to -10 day-over-day
What happened after
13d ago · $2.34
Evidence: -18.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
13d ago · $2.34
Evidence: attention score 100/100
What happened after
13d ago · $2.34
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
13d ago · $2.34
Evidence: 1.6x recent average volume
What happened after
14d ago · $2.89
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
14d ago · $2.89
Evidence: 2.4x recent average volume
What happened after
14d ago · $2.89
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $2.96
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
17d ago · $2.96
Evidence: 2.1x recent average volume
What happened after
17d ago · $2.96
Evidence: 11 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
18d ago · $2.94
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
18d ago · $2.94
Evidence: 2.1x recent average volume
What happened after
18d ago · $2.94
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
19d ago · $2.91
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
19d ago · $2.91
Evidence: 2.0x recent average volume
What happened after
19d ago · $2.91
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 27, 2026
Then
81
$2.91
Now
37
$2.29
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
13
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Rezolve AI PLC has centered on its explosive revenue growth—nearly 2,000% year-over-year in the first half of 2026—alongside widening losses and investor concerns about sustainability. The company also secured its first major cloud database deployment with Google Cloud, signaling validation of its AI infrastructure technology. Despite strong earnings, stock volatility reflects uncertainty over profitability and long-term scalability amid rapid expansion.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Rezolve AI PLC. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
62
Fundamentals
—
Technical
13
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-15%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior in RZLV suggests traders are aligning with peers rather than independent analysis, as today’s outperformance (+4.5% vs. +3.3% peer avg) indicates mimicking. While FOMO and panic signals coexist, the extreme positive sentiment (100/100) and elevated volume (1.38x) imply a speculative, herd-driven rally. The narrative gap (7-point divergence) hints at potential misalignment between market enthusiasm and fundamentals. The key question: will momentum sustain despite weak momentum (-6.5% ROC) and below-average price positioning?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 08:54 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The AI commerce and payments company also said its enterprise customer base grew to 1,640 accounts. **Numbers like that demand attention, but the same report showed losses widening even faster**"
"**Google Cloud has selected its distributed database technology for deployment within Google Cloud infrastructure**"
"**Investors have questions about the business's outlook**"
"**enterprise customers nearly doubled**"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between those who see RZLV as a compelling opportunity and those who flag it as risky or poorly understood. The highest-scoring approaches—Samuel Armstrong Nelson (90), Thorstein Veblen (80), and Jack Schwager (80)—all highlight favorable technical or cyclical positioning, real-value alignment, or disciplined setups, suggesting a bullish case rooted in momentum or qualitative growth. Meanwhile, the middle tier—Charles Mackay (76) and Howard Marks (Market Cycle, 65)—cautiously endorse it as early-cycle or free from crowd-driven hype, though Marks’ broader verdict (46) introduces doubt about inflated expectations. The lower half, however, dominates with skepticism: Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot all cite insufficient data, while Livermore (26) and Loeb (21) warn of trend resistance or unacceptable risk. Even the efficient-market camp (28) dismisses it as a suboptimal bet, and Housel’s 0 score reflects a volatility-driven red flag. The divide underscores a clash between those prioritizing technical or qualitative signals and those demanding rigorous fundamentals or risk discipline.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 28
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 10
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Motley Fool · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Stocktwits · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Motley Fool · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Moby · 1.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Proactive · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Rezolve AI PLC (RZLV) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for RZLV specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
RZLV's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.9% of price; Calmar: -0.44 (3y annualized return -40.3% / max drawdown 91.8%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for RZLV.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 12 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | E | 16.8.2026 | 0 | -2,025,496 | — |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 16.8.2026 | 0 | -1,566,697 | — |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | E | 16.8.2026 | 2,025,496 | -2,025,496 | — |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 16.8.2026 | 1,566,697 | -1,566,697 | — |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | W | 10.7.2026 | 50,331,287 | +543,993 | — |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | W | 10.7.2026 | 543,993 | +543,993 | — |
| Perry Stephen | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 95,600 | +95,600 | $2.78 |
| Perry Stephen | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 874,526 | +95,600 | $2.78 |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | Open Market Purchase | 2.4.2026 | 539,637 | +539,637 | $4.00 |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | Open Market Purchase | 2.4.2026 | 273,319 | +273,319 | $4.00 |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | Open Market Purchase | 2.4.2026 | 47,245,480 | +273,319 | $4.00 |
| Wagner Daniel Maurice | Open Market Purchase | 2.4.2026 | 47,785,117 | +539,637 | $4.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
33,946,966 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 38,918,096 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology