Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$3.97
▼ $0.23 (-5.5%)
Market data updated: 09/28 02:19 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/28/2026
Market Cap
$1.01B
Day Range
$3.97 - $4.28
52-Week Range
$0.39 - $8.60
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$2.88
Resistance
$5.67
RXT is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+179.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 75.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$6.03 vs. price $3.97 (-251.9%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
8d ago · $3.80
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 21 to 49 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
8d ago · $3.80
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 76)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
8d ago · $3.80
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 20 to 61 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
69
Risk
32
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
31
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Rackspace Technology has centered on its strategic expansion into cloud infrastructure, particularly the launch of Rackspace Cloud, a fully managed multitenant platform built on Broadcom’s VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1. This marks one of the first commercial deployments of the technology, targeting regulated industries needing AI, Kubernetes, and VM workloads with strong governance controls. Additionally, headlines highlight executive share sales, including CEO Scott Anthony’s disposal of a significant portion of his holdings amid a stock rally, alongside investor interest reflected in strong quarterly returns from firms like Voss Capital.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Rackspace Technology, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
63
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
87
Fundamentals
31
Technical
69
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-34%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+49
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant Loss Aversion (95) reflects a deep-seated reluctance to accept further losses, amplified by a 38.9% drop over three months. Despite positive sentiment (98/100) and a narrative-reality gap (+24), the stock’s underperformance and subdued volatility suggest traders are clinging to positions rather than chasing gains. Confirmation bias (31) may reinforce selective optimism about fundamentals (e.g., improving margins), but the lack of momentum or euphoria keeps speculative energy muted. The key question remains whether the narrative gap can sustain interest amid persistent underperformance—or if the market will eventually accept the reality of weaker price action.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Rackspace Technology Insider Sold Shares Worth $1,600,917"
"Rackspace Cloud, a fully managed multitenant platform built on Broadcom's VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1"
"Rackspace Technology Launches Enterprise Cloud Service"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Charles Mackay — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing it as a cautiously optimistic play and others flagging it as risky or overpriced. The highest-scoring approaches—Howard Marks’ *Market Cycle* (79) and Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology lens (76)—suggest it’s positioned early-to-mid cycle, far from mania, implying room for upside. Samuel Armstrong Nelson (70) and Morgan Housel (63) also lean positive, framing it as a holdable or favorable cyclical bet, though with guarded optimism. In contrast, the lower-scoring models—like Jesse Livermore (31), Walter Bagehot (35), and Philip Fisher (33)—paint a starker picture, warning of trend resistance, liquidity risks, or lackluster quality/growth. Even Graham’s *Defensive Investor* (50) and *Enterprising Investor* (0) struggle to justify a clear buy, while efficient-market theorists (48) dismiss it as unworthy of active picking. The split reflects a tension between cyclical optimism and fundamental caution, with no single methodology reaching consensus.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 70
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 61
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 61
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 44
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 35
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 28
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 23
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 22
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
18.9%
Operating Margin
-3.7%
Net Margin
-8.4%
EBITDA Margin
-3.7%
ROE
18.5%
ROA
-8.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.95
Cash
$105.80M
Total Debt
$2.75B
Current Ratio
0.68
Debt/Equity
-2.25
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$3.97
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$6.03
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-251.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-4.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.9% | $86.19M | $79.07M |
| 2 | -3.0% | $83.58M | $70.35M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $82.59M | $63.77M |
| 4 | 0.7% | $83.13M | $58.89M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $85.21M | $55.38M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$90.60M
Terminal Value
$1.34B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$873.31M
Enterprise Value
$1.20B
Net Debt
$2.64B
Equity Value
$-1.44B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$5.11
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$11.13
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Barchart · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
TheStreet · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RXT currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, RXT's estimated fair value is -$6.03, which is 251.9% below the current price of $3.97. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
RXT's technical score is 69/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 75.1%; Free cash flow growth: 227.2%; Net income growth: 73.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$6.03 vs. price $3.97 (-251.9%); Operating margin: -3.7% (negative); Net margin: -8.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for RXT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 14 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sobel Aaron F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 40,545 | +40,545 | — |
| TEAL-GUESS KELLIE | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,285,176 | -33,558 | $3.13 |
| TEAL-GUESS KELLIE | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 33,558 | -33,558 | $3.13 |
| Kandiah Gajakarnan Vibushanan | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 3,684,955 | -498,728 | $3.21 |
| Kandiah Gajakarnan Vibushanan | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 498,728 | -498,728 | $3.21 |
| Kandiah Gajakarnan Vibushanan | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 4,183,683 | -8,258 | $2.95 |
| SINHA DHARMENDRA KUMAR | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 3,263,429 | -107,002 | $2.95 |
| Marino Mark A. | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 2,865,853 | -51,373 | $2.95 |
| SINHA DHARMENDRA KUMAR | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 107,002 | -107,002 | $2.95 |
| Kandiah Gajakarnan Vibushanan | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 8,258 | -8,258 | $2.95 |
| Marino Mark A. | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 51,373 | -51,373 | $2.95 |
| Scott Anthony | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 180,215 | -48,780 | $4.25 |
| Scott Anthony | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 48,780 | -48,780 | $4.25 |
| Roberts Anthony C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 37,950 | +37,950 | — |
| BENJAMIN JEFFREY D | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 71,156 | +71,156 | — |
| Roberts Anthony C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 18.6.2026 | 35,472 | -35,472 | $7.22 |
| Garber Mitchell Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 37,950 | +37,950 | — |
| Scott Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 37,950 | +37,950 | — |
| BENJAMIN JEFFREY D | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 636,318 | +71,156 | — |
| Garber Mitchell Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 411,810 | +37,950 | — |
| Scott Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 228,995 | +37,950 | — |
| Roberts Anthony C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 18.6.2026 | 177,513 | -35,472 | $7.22 |
| Roberts Anthony C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 215,463 | +37,950 | — |
| TEAL-GUESS KELLIE | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 33,966 | -33,966 | $5.56 |
| SINHA DHARMENDRA KUMAR | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 48,099 | -48,099 | $5.56 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
27,084,615 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 26,762,321 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology